Recommended Website - GlobalResearch.ca
- Thread starter DerekJay
- Start date
Hahaha.
You realize, this Michel Chossudovsky is nuts, eh?
Let's look at the headlines.
Is the Bush Administration Planning a Nuclear Holocaust? http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060222&articleId=2032
Michel Chossudovsky: War and Globalization: the Truth behind 9/11
http://www.canadiancontent.net/en/jd/go?Url=http://www.globalresearch.ca
Is America Preparing for Martial Law?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20050410&articleId=71
The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction: "Owning the Weather" for Military Use
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20040927&articleId=319
Coup d'Etat in America?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20040713&articleId=57
Bush Administration "Guidelines" for Postponing or Canceling the November Presidential Elections
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20040701&articleId=103
The Left discredits itself with this type of nonsense.
You realize, this Michel Chossudovsky is nuts, eh?
Let's look at the headlines.
Is the Bush Administration Planning a Nuclear Holocaust? http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=20060222&articleId=2032
Michel Chossudovsky: War and Globalization: the Truth behind 9/11
http://www.canadiancontent.net/en/jd/go?Url=http://www.globalresearch.ca
Is America Preparing for Martial Law?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20050410&articleId=71
The Ultimate Weapon of Mass Destruction: "Owning the Weather" for Military Use
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20040927&articleId=319
Coup d'Etat in America?
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20040713&articleId=57
Bush Administration "Guidelines" for Postponing or Canceling the November Presidential Elections
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=CHO20040701&articleId=103
The Left discredits itself with this type of nonsense.
Wheres the link to "Aliens are taking control of our minds", this is an important site that offers tips and counter measure to ensure the aliens don't get you. I just evicted one from my sun-room and that bastard put up a hell of a fight.
Toro said:
You can call him nuts... but if you read his work with an open mind, I think you might find that he's quite an intelligent guy, that can support a lot of his articles with facts.
Easy to post a few headlines, then laugh calling him crazy.
I laugh every day when I read letters from people claiming how great it is that Canada is involved in this "war on terrorism". You see, I'm not one who picks up the paper and believes everything... I use facts and supporting arguments to separate the truth from lies.
Sassylassie said:
I must admit... I laughed at your comment. If this is your type of reading, I might suggest abovetopsecret.com
If you believe everything here... then you really need to get your head examined.
There are a few intelligent folk that contribute some interesting stuff though.
I think not said:
Hurtig's not really a foiler, just deluded.
But Chossudovsky,
GONG!
is the real deal!
I would imagine you would need an open mind to believe we are in Afghanistan not because of 9/11 but because of pipelines and that GWB orchestrated the whole tragedy for oil.
If I didn't believe the reasons people spew this drivel are diabolical, I would believe they were so open minded their brains fell out.
If I didn't believe the reasons people spew this drivel are diabolical, I would believe they were so open minded their brains fell out.
And you shouldn't assume I'm only going by what’s on CNN. I mean really, your not the first person to come in here and claim these things...I have a theory too, and if you search around here you will find it. I'm completely convinced these wars are about sheep.....
I can smell anti-Americanism from miles away.
I can smell anti-Americanism from miles away.
Derekjay; I don't believe Bushes greed for oil is what Irag is all about. However, I don't discount the fact that the Oil Industry is bigger than any governement that exist today and is also more powerful. Thus, if there is oil in a conflick zone/country they will be their like ugly on an ape and suck the life blood out of that country and when done-- their off to another country where oil and strife exist, they are pucking parisites. The entire world needs to wake up and take that very big bastard (I mean all oil companies) and start putting some controls in place. Look at Nigeria, the oil company is polluting Tribal lands, human beings are like cockroaches to the oil industry-they have no value. Gotta go now blood pressure is rising to dangerous levels. Cheers.
Sassylassie said:
You make a good point, and your view is similar to mine in a sense that the U.S. government has their hand in this - The Bush family profits when the big Oil and gas companies he is involved with profits. These high level Industrialists and government are working hand-in-hand. all working together to achieve the same goal - $$$$$$$$ and power.
Rather than say...lefty countries, whos main objectives seem to be to shit all over people, make them poor and slaves to stupid ideas?
I'll take American cooperation over the other choice any day. I mean what, the government and industrialist should be working against each other to make people powerless and poor?
I'll take American cooperation over the other choice any day. I mean what, the government and industrialist should be working against each other to make people powerless and poor?
Re: RE: Recommended Website - GlobalResearch.ca
For the record... I'm not anti-American.
What I can't stand is how the government uses its military to wage war (in the interest of national security), when in fact it has more to do with power, control, and Oil reserves. If you stack up all of the reasons that the government gave all of us to justify these middle East wars (ie WMD, etc) and then compare them with all of the "others", good common sense and logic says that the U.S. would have nothing to do with these countries if there wasn't a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
It's the deception and false fronts that are created in order to rally support of these wars that drive me crazy. If your reference to "sheep" would have anything to do with the Americans being led to war with a "cause"... then I would agree with this analogy. I don't believe that the average soldier would be willing to put his life on the line if Bush told them straight up - "We need to occupy the middle east and take over the controls so me and my buddies can make a whole whack of money drilling some black gold... Hoo wahh!"
I think not. Protecting "freedom" and Fighting "terrorists" sounds a whole lot better.
Jay said:
For the record... I'm not anti-American.
What I can't stand is how the government uses its military to wage war (in the interest of national security), when in fact it has more to do with power, control, and Oil reserves. If you stack up all of the reasons that the government gave all of us to justify these middle East wars (ie WMD, etc) and then compare them with all of the "others", good common sense and logic says that the U.S. would have nothing to do with these countries if there wasn't a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow.
It's the deception and false fronts that are created in order to rally support of these wars that drive me crazy. If your reference to "sheep" would have anything to do with the Americans being led to war with a "cause"... then I would agree with this analogy. I don't believe that the average soldier would be willing to put his life on the line if Bush told them straight up - "We need to occupy the middle east and take over the controls so me and my buddies can make a whole whack of money drilling some black gold... Hoo wahh!"
I think not. Protecting "freedom" and Fighting "terrorists" sounds a whole lot better.
To the anti-American, or anti-oil industry, or anti-Bush crowd, or anti-whatever, its always this cartoonish scenario when every single thing is about oil. Invading Afghanistan is about Anmericans controlling oil. Allowing the genocide in Sudan is about the Americans controlling oil. 9/11 is some demented plot by Bush and his buddy Osama bin Laden to justify the invasion of Iraq so the Americans can control oil.
These theories aren't kept out of the mainstream media because of some corporate-controlled media conspiracy plot. Its because they're laughable. That's why organizations such as globalresearch aren't taken seriously.
These theories aren't kept out of the mainstream media because of some corporate-controlled media conspiracy plot. Its because they're laughable. That's why organizations such as globalresearch aren't taken seriously.
Re: RE: Recommended Website - GlobalResearch.ca
1. I have nothing against Americans... the manner in which they support the criminal organization that they call a government would be the extent of my discontent. I know many Americans, and I don't hate them. For the same reason I don't hate you for not having open mind to accept ideas outside of what we are told to believe.
2. To Clarify... the "pot of Gold" is more than Oil - Controlling these important resources equates to power, and money... which is why they are there, whether you are willing to accept that or not. This region is critical since they U.S. can't afford to be dependant on a middle east shit-show for their Oil. The Industrialists that are in bed with Bush also stand to make enourmous profits from the contracts... hmm... didn't Afghanistan report some 18X the amount expected just yesterday? The big-picture and long-range plan goes higher than this.. but for the sake of time, I'll leave it at that.
3. IF you actually believe that this "war on terrorism" is for real... then you are naive my friend. While I would agree with the fact that there are many problems in the middle east with people that are fanatical with killing the "infidel", what the U.S has done is not solve the problem. In fact, they have only thrown more fuel in the fire with the growing discontent over a U.S. occupancy. History tells us that this type of solution never amounts to a positive change. Vietman was about drugs... never about communism, just like Iraq and Afghanstan have nothing to do with human rights and terrorists. Years from now... when he U.S. military finally leaves these countries, they will be in no better shape than the day before they started dropping bombs. In fact, there will be even more people willing to strap a bomb around their waist and scream "Allah Akbhar!" Ask yourself - Who stands to gain? Certainly not the front-line soldiers who are doing the fighting... they only risk losing their lives and leaving their wives and husbands and children at home to fend for themselves. Meanwhile, Bush, the Elites and Industrialists make more money and hold more power on the world stage.
Jay said:
1. I have nothing against Americans... the manner in which they support the criminal organization that they call a government would be the extent of my discontent. I know many Americans, and I don't hate them. For the same reason I don't hate you for not having open mind to accept ideas outside of what we are told to believe.
2. To Clarify... the "pot of Gold" is more than Oil - Controlling these important resources equates to power, and money... which is why they are there, whether you are willing to accept that or not. This region is critical since they U.S. can't afford to be dependant on a middle east shit-show for their Oil. The Industrialists that are in bed with Bush also stand to make enourmous profits from the contracts... hmm... didn't Afghanistan report some 18X the amount expected just yesterday? The big-picture and long-range plan goes higher than this.. but for the sake of time, I'll leave it at that.
3. IF you actually believe that this "war on terrorism" is for real... then you are naive my friend. While I would agree with the fact that there are many problems in the middle east with people that are fanatical with killing the "infidel", what the U.S has done is not solve the problem. In fact, they have only thrown more fuel in the fire with the growing discontent over a U.S. occupancy. History tells us that this type of solution never amounts to a positive change. Vietman was about drugs... never about communism, just like Iraq and Afghanstan have nothing to do with human rights and terrorists. Years from now... when he U.S. military finally leaves these countries, they will be in no better shape than the day before they started dropping bombs. In fact, there will be even more people willing to strap a bomb around their waist and scream "Allah Akbhar!" Ask yourself - Who stands to gain? Certainly not the front-line soldiers who are doing the fighting... they only risk losing their lives and leaving their wives and husbands and children at home to fend for themselves. Meanwhile, Bush, the Elites and Industrialists make more money and hold more power on the world stage.
Sure...whatever.
All you want to do is stop the spread of democracy and freedom either because your evil or you simply can't see what it does for the success of people/the masses.
God Bless America and destroy her enemies. Feel like getting in the way?
All you want to do is stop the spread of democracy and freedom either because your evil or you simply can't see what it does for the success of people/the masses.
God Bless America and destroy her enemies. Feel like getting in the way?
RE: Recommended Website -
The media gave the US government a free ride without much criticism when it decided to invade Iraq. The world said that they didn't have much proof Saddam still had the weapons capacity. The inspectors didn't see the proof though they were always open minded to it.
Powell’s case for invading Iraq was based on forged documents that were proven to be forged before he gave his speech to the UN. Note that there was the outing of a CIA agent as a way of punishing Wilson for challenging the administration on the matter.
(I’ll even use well known US sources)
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/14/sprj.irq.documents/
(CIA outing)
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1083895,00.html?internalid=ACA
Moreover, much of the info Powell gave was old and dated. Did the media really take the US government to task? No.
A poll was also done asking people whether they believed there was a connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda. At the time most believed there was even though the connection was proven to be hardly the case. Saddam and Osama were actually rivals. Saddam, because of his tyranny, would never allow a militant group to operate within his country.
Did the news media work to really inform the public of their misconceptions? No. Even when Bush himself had to publicly state there was no connection to 911, through his administration continue to make references to 911 with regards to invading Iraq. Does the media take them to task on continually spreading misperceptions? No.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5223932/
The UN made a clear stance that the case for war wasn’t strong. Old allies challenged the US on this. The US media however rather than question the validity of their arguments, created a poor impression of the rest of the world, the UN, and scapegoated France. Who was right in the end? Well now that hindsight is 20/20 I guess the rest of world but the information was there at the time to challenge the need for war. Did the media take the US government to task? No.
(Please note, Harper would have taken us into Iraq if he were leader at the time. He wrote an letter of apology to the US for Canada’s refusal to become involved.)
NBC is 80% owned by General Electric. I take interest in who owns what. I have to as I have a keen interest in the markets. So don’t say I’m not into capitalism. I need to get my facts straight or I lose my ass if I just go along believing the taking heads or the corporate BS. General Electric makes missile switches. You tell me there isn’t a conflict of interest.
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/ge.asp
I didn’t look up the website originally posted for this forum so what I’m saying has nothing to do with it. The facts I mentioned however are out there.
The political decisions a country makes are my business to know because they do things to an economy which I have a keen interest in. So I have to know what is really going on regardless of the patriotic fuzzy feeling the media likes to reports. If somebody wants a more clearer picture than they have to read the news from all over the place, stick it up on a wall and draw a line down the middle.
The mainstream US media, I’ve discovered, has the least reliable news out there. They might give mention of truth, but then they bury it with the government position and paid experts. It then all becomes a blur where the public mostly hears the falsehoods while never having the time to dig deeper for the real truth.
My greatest concern would be that we go soft on this side of the fence with reporting.
Why is Harper in hiding? An official complaint was filed by our media with the political body for Harpers refusal to meet with the media.
The media gave the US government a free ride without much criticism when it decided to invade Iraq. The world said that they didn't have much proof Saddam still had the weapons capacity. The inspectors didn't see the proof though they were always open minded to it.
Powell’s case for invading Iraq was based on forged documents that were proven to be forged before he gave his speech to the UN. Note that there was the outing of a CIA agent as a way of punishing Wilson for challenging the administration on the matter.
(I’ll even use well known US sources)
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/14/sprj.irq.documents/
(CIA outing)
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1083895,00.html?internalid=ACA
Moreover, much of the info Powell gave was old and dated. Did the media really take the US government to task? No.
A poll was also done asking people whether they believed there was a connection between Saddam and Al Qaeda. At the time most believed there was even though the connection was proven to be hardly the case. Saddam and Osama were actually rivals. Saddam, because of his tyranny, would never allow a militant group to operate within his country.
Did the news media work to really inform the public of their misconceptions? No. Even when Bush himself had to publicly state there was no connection to 911, through his administration continue to make references to 911 with regards to invading Iraq. Does the media take them to task on continually spreading misperceptions? No.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/5223932/
The UN made a clear stance that the case for war wasn’t strong. Old allies challenged the US on this. The US media however rather than question the validity of their arguments, created a poor impression of the rest of the world, the UN, and scapegoated France. Who was right in the end? Well now that hindsight is 20/20 I guess the rest of world but the information was there at the time to challenge the need for war. Did the media take the US government to task? No.
(Please note, Harper would have taken us into Iraq if he were leader at the time. He wrote an letter of apology to the US for Canada’s refusal to become involved.)
NBC is 80% owned by General Electric. I take interest in who owns what. I have to as I have a keen interest in the markets. So don’t say I’m not into capitalism. I need to get my facts straight or I lose my ass if I just go along believing the taking heads or the corporate BS. General Electric makes missile switches. You tell me there isn’t a conflict of interest.
http://www.cjr.org/tools/owners/ge.asp
I didn’t look up the website originally posted for this forum so what I’m saying has nothing to do with it. The facts I mentioned however are out there.
The political decisions a country makes are my business to know because they do things to an economy which I have a keen interest in. So I have to know what is really going on regardless of the patriotic fuzzy feeling the media likes to reports. If somebody wants a more clearer picture than they have to read the news from all over the place, stick it up on a wall and draw a line down the middle.
The mainstream US media, I’ve discovered, has the least reliable news out there. They might give mention of truth, but then they bury it with the government position and paid experts. It then all becomes a blur where the public mostly hears the falsehoods while never having the time to dig deeper for the real truth.
My greatest concern would be that we go soft on this side of the fence with reporting.
Why is Harper in hiding? An official complaint was filed by our media with the political body for Harpers refusal to meet with the media.