OTTAWA (CP) - The prime minister's refusal to co-operate with an ethics investigation into the David Emerson floor-crossing violates the law and sets a dangerous precedent, a Liberal MP charged Thursday.
ADVERTISEMENT
Wayne Easter, a former Liberal cabinet minister, said Harper's fight with ethics commissioner Bernard Shapiro cuts at the heart of government accountability. "It's become a much bigger issue," Easter told a news conference.
"If he was ever to get away with dumping Mr. Shapiro and appointing another ethics commissioner, it sets an extremely dangerous precedent for future parliaments and future prime ministers in terms of all officers of the House of Commons."
Moreover, Harper is directly contravening the federal conflict-of-interest act by refusing to co-operate with Shapiro.
"Hopefully, we can convince the prime minister to basically follow the laws of the land," said Easter, a former solicitor general.
Shapiro agreed last week to investigate an opposition complaint about Emerson's decision to switch to the Conservative party and join Harper's cabinet within days of the January federal election.
Harper has said he has the last word on who gets invited into cabinet and he won't allow an unelected "Liberal appointed" official to get involved.
Shapiro, whose 2004 appointment was approved by all parties in the Commons, came in for criticism from a variety of fronts during the last Parliament.
But Harper's heavy-handed approach to this latest investigation has spurred Liberals and New Democrats to dig in their heels to protect the integrity of the commissioner's office.
Easter said Harper's recent, self-admitted approach to former NDP MP Ed Broadbent to replace Shapiro clearly oversteps the prime minister's authority.
"The fact of the matter is that Prime Minister Harper cannot fire Shapiro unless he can engineer some act through the Parliament of Canada," said Easter.
"This is the very reason why the ethics commissioner and Bill C-4 was passed: to take away the authority of the Prime Minister's Office to have influence over the ethics commissioner."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/cpress/2006...jhvaA8F;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
Kind of funny when he says that a Liberal appointed guy is tainted basically, but if he appoints someone, it is all good.
He is a bunch of crap, and is trying to create a authortative state of parliment around him. I am glad he didn't get a majority or even a good sizable minority.
ADVERTISEMENT
Wayne Easter, a former Liberal cabinet minister, said Harper's fight with ethics commissioner Bernard Shapiro cuts at the heart of government accountability. "It's become a much bigger issue," Easter told a news conference.
"If he was ever to get away with dumping Mr. Shapiro and appointing another ethics commissioner, it sets an extremely dangerous precedent for future parliaments and future prime ministers in terms of all officers of the House of Commons."
Moreover, Harper is directly contravening the federal conflict-of-interest act by refusing to co-operate with Shapiro.
"Hopefully, we can convince the prime minister to basically follow the laws of the land," said Easter, a former solicitor general.
Shapiro agreed last week to investigate an opposition complaint about Emerson's decision to switch to the Conservative party and join Harper's cabinet within days of the January federal election.
Harper has said he has the last word on who gets invited into cabinet and he won't allow an unelected "Liberal appointed" official to get involved.
Shapiro, whose 2004 appointment was approved by all parties in the Commons, came in for criticism from a variety of fronts during the last Parliament.
But Harper's heavy-handed approach to this latest investigation has spurred Liberals and New Democrats to dig in their heels to protect the integrity of the commissioner's office.
Easter said Harper's recent, self-admitted approach to former NDP MP Ed Broadbent to replace Shapiro clearly oversteps the prime minister's authority.
"The fact of the matter is that Prime Minister Harper cannot fire Shapiro unless he can engineer some act through the Parliament of Canada," said Easter.
"This is the very reason why the ethics commissioner and Bill C-4 was passed: to take away the authority of the Prime Minister's Office to have influence over the ethics commissioner."
http://news.yahoo.com/s/cpress/2006...jhvaA8F;_ylu=X3oDMTA5aHJvMDdwBHNlYwN5bmNhdA--
Kind of funny when he says that a Liberal appointed guy is tainted basically, but if he appoints someone, it is all good.
He is a bunch of crap, and is trying to create a authortative state of parliment around him. I am glad he didn't get a majority or even a good sizable minority.