This has been kicked around in some of the threads here and I want to consolidate as many peoples views on this as is possible.
I will start things off by transfering some of the posts left elsewhere here on this subject and see what the pros and cons are on this statement:
I will start things off by transfering some of the posts left elsewhere here on this subject and see what the pros and cons are on this statement:
iamcanadian said:Reverend Blair said:Can you prove corruption within the gun registry, or are you tossing out epithets unthinkingly?
I believe I can give it a good old college try... lets how it works and see:
Politicians responding to some perceived need or lobby group vote to accept a recommendation from some senior bureaucrat that suggests creating a gun registry and asking for approval of funding for it.
The budget is set and go ahead given.
Because the nature of processing the registration of guns involves both personally identifiable information and police record searches on individuals, the actual physical work done and associated with the expenditure of the public funds had to be kept separate and in cases secret, because we are dealing under the aura of public safety and secrity and sensitive invasion of privacy issues.
When the auditor comes around to verify proper spending practices on this budget, the response to to the Auditor was "we can't show you the records that back up the expenses we incured because it discloses sensitive private/policing information, exempt from the auditors office review". The Auditor says ok, the law agrees with you and I just have to take your word for it that the money was properly spent.
The senior administrators then spend the initial budget and go and ask for more money since they are not finished. The reports go in asking for more money and the politicians ask "what did you do with the money we gave you and why was it not enough". The reply, we can't tell you because this would divulge sensitive personal/policing informaton". Ok is received for more money.
This then sets off the basis for the taking of foot with every inch and just as you end up with 10,000 rabbits in one year when starting with just 2 of them screwing around at first, we reach $2.0 Billion dollars soon enough.
With that number, it becomes obvious that something is very wrong. As more people become cogniscent of the effort required in using and applying computers to things the scam cannot be denied by a reasoning process.