National Child care, a reason to do away with provinces


Paranoid Dot Calm
#31
Hey! Reverend Blair

What you said was well said.

Nothing has changed since the peasants grabbed their pitch forks and stormed the King's Castle those many years ago.
The inequality still remains.

Calm
 
Paranoid Dot Calm
#32
Hey! Reverend Blair

What you said was well said.

Nothing has changed since the peasants grabbed their pitch forks and stormed the King's Castle those many years ago.
The inequality still remains.

Calm
 
Paranoid Dot Calm
#33
Hey! Reverend Blair

What you said was well said.

Nothing has changed since the peasants grabbed their pitch forks and stormed the King's Castle those many years ago.
The inequality still remains.

Calm
 
Jay
Avatar
#34
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/natio...den050215.html



and she's cute too.....
 
Reverend Blair
#35
Are the Reform/Alliance/Conservatives so ridiculously inept at math that they can't figure out that we can afford to fund childcare, but cannot afford to pay half the population to stay home?

Are they suggesting that every parent in Canada who wants to stay home with the kids be paid $30K or so a year? Isn't that really just welfare for people who don't feel like working? What about people who are on welfare right now? Do they that $30K too?
 
Twila
Avatar
#36
I remember my grandmother telling me that when my mother was little, they had NO daycare programs. She relied on neighbours. Exchanging babysitting as it were.

My grandmother was a single mom. I guess in those days it the "it takes a village to raise a child" was held closer to the heart then it is in this day and age.
 
peapod
#37
so true twila
 
Reverend Blair
#38
Things have changed a lot since then though. In most working and middle class neighbourhoods there is nobody to look after the kids during the day. Most days around here, there's just the retired guys and me.

I doubt I could do my work if I had to look after a kid at the same time. It isn't the kind of thing they can participate in and I do require at least some quiet. The retired people do look after some kids, but they aren't too happy about having to do it every day.

That pretty much takes us back to needing a national daycare system.
 
Jay
Avatar
#39
Quote: Originally Posted by gonzo

The battle to have a national child care program further proves that provinces don’t care about the country but only about retaining and gaining more power.

Gonzo said it backwards. It is the Canadian government who further proves it doesn’t care about the country when it cares more about meddling about in provincial affairs.
Correct me if I’m wrong; the provinces do not meddle in the constitutional affairs of the Federal Government. It isn’t an issue. When it is an issue it goes to the Supreme Court and is settled there. The federal government is consistently stirring the pot and dividing Canadians with its contempt for the power sharing as it was written on 1867. If this doesn’t stop, I think it will break the country up.


Quote: Originally Posted by jackd

The Federal Govern. had very little power given by the 1867 Constitution: regulation of trade and commerce , the post office,
the census ,national defense ,employment insurance, money and banking, copyrights , criminal law , citizenship, foreign policy . That's it, nothing more.

Unfortunately this is an incorrect statement, and may be part of the reason ppl don’t understand what is so troubling about this issue. The federal government has been given every other responsibility other then that which is exclusivity given to the provinces.

Lets quote the BNA Act:

“91. It shall be lawful for the Queen, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate and House of Commons, to make laws for the Peace, Order, and good Government of Canada, in relation to all Matters not coming within the Classes of Subjects by this Act assigned exclusively to the Legislatures of the Provinces; and for greater Certainty, but not so as to restrict the Generality of the foregoing Terms of this Section, it is hereby declared that (notwithstanding anything in this Act) the exclusive Legislative Authority of the Parliament of Canada extends to all Matters coming within the Classes of Subjects next hereinafter enumerated; that is to say,-- “


Difficult language, but, it clearly says “in relation to all matters not coming within the classes of subjects by this act assigned exclusively to the legislators of the province…”
Then it goes further to add to the federal governments understanding of its role saying “and for greater certainty, but not as to restrict the generality of the fore going terms…”

There are 29 subjects mentioned. They are the exclusive powers given to the feds as to what role they are to play in this merger of states. The provinces are given exclusively to their power; the feds are given everything else. Other wise the wording would be different.


Then….


Quote: Originally Posted by gonzo

True. But the provinces always have their hands out for more money from Ottawa. They want the money, but they dont want to be told how to spend it. And I agree, Quebec's system seems to be a good one. But I do think that the federal government should have more power. Because if the federal government is weak and doesn't control anything, whats the point in having a country?

The provinces haven’t their hand out for more money it is again the other way around.

Term or subject # 2 of the Exclusive Powers of Provincial Legislatures is direct taxation. The federal government has no business being involved in direct taxation in any province.

Secondly the provinces really only ask for money when it has to do with the federal policies of wealth redistribution with in the country. The feds love the agreements they just don’t like living up to them monetarily. They create all sorts of departments they shouldn’t have though, and give money away to their friends, and they cause **** with under funding, and these things have an effect on provincial politics too. The feds love it.

As for the federal government needing more power. Well I think I’ve already established that it has plenty of other things to do with its time. It could make our nation strong, but instead it tries to have us bickering. The biggest proponent to separating provinces in this country is the federal government.

Quote:

whats the point in having a country?

In this part of the woods, it’s to bring around a union of states.


Quote: Originally Posted by Reverend Dear

It's funny...we say everybody is equal, but the inequalities of education start with daycare and continue all the way through to fewer and fewer people being able to afford university.

Regardless, these are provincial issues.

If the people/government of Manitoba decide these issues are to be funded exclusively by the legislator of their province that is their business. Not Ontario’s, or the federal government’s. If the federal government has an extra 5 billion to blow on some program, it should use it for a matter that concerns them, pay off debt with it, or return it to the rightful owner of those funds, which is to say the provinces they took it from.

Sure we say people are equal, but they aren’t all to receive 30K a year; they are equal before the law.



Quote: Originally Posted by Reverend Dear

It needs to be federally regulated so when kids move there is some continuity in school.

This isn’t a big enough reason for the feds to join in. My wife’s a teacher; her job is to teach kids. If there are special needs for her students, she accommodates them. So do guidance departments.

I’m simply saying this is no justification. We expect differences. These are provinces we are dealing with, not one great big one called Canada in the united federation of word states run by the non elected UN and serves the USA or whoever it pleases.

Quote: Originally Posted by Reverend Dear

Kindergarten was just coming in when I was a kid. I went to kindergarten and part of grade 1 in Edmonton. I finished grade 1 in Regina where I went school until grade 4. Then we moved to Ottawa. Then halfway through grade 7 we went back to Regina.

You don’t seem to be much worst for the wear.


The issue is about power and why does the federal government want to have provincial powers. It isn’t about childcare. Any province that wants to have free or partly free childcare may do so with the blessing of its people. It’s about posturing and bickering over what isn’t an issue. The federal government is acting very much like it has adopted an attitude of complete centralization of this country, and it is breaking the country up.

I say these very well may be the reasons our constitutional framers wanted powers to be the way they are, to keep the country together, and stable. I also say the people who try to centralize this nation are trying to destroy it.
 
Reverend Blair
#40
Quote:

It is the Canadian government who further proves it doesn’t care about the country when it cares more about meddling about in provincial affairs.

It is the Canadian government that is trying to ensure that all Canadians have access to equal services.

Quote:

Correct me if I’m wrong; the provinces do not meddle in the constitutional affairs of the Federal Government.

You're wrong. Every single time a constitutional issue comes up, the provinces are there yelling and screaming. Raplh Klein is likely the worst.

Quote:

In this part of the woods, it’s to bring around a union of states.

So are you saying you're an American, JJ? That would explain the regressive political stances, I guess.

Quote:

Regardless, these are provincial issues.

Apparently not, since we are talking about a national system.

Quote:

This isn’t a big enough reason for the feds to join in.

It sure as hell is. People didn;t move nearly as often or as far when I was a kid as they do now.

Quote:

My wife’s a teacher; her job is to teach kids. If there are special needs for her students, she accommodates them. So do guidance departments.

Is your wife a kid who moves a lot? No? Then you don't understand the problem.

Quote:

I’m simply saying this is no justification. We expect differences.

Why should there be differences. Why, when we moved to Ottawa, was I a full year ahead in everything but French? Why was Social Studies taught in French in an English school? Why are there no national standards?

Quote:

These are provinces we are dealing with, not one great big one called Canada in the united federation of word states run by the non elected UN and serves the USA or whoever it pleases.

What the hell are you talking about? The rest of us are talking about making sure that kids get the best possible shot in life and you are spewing paranoid nonsensical garbage based on lies that the boys on Fox tell.

Quote:

You don’t seem to be much worst for the wear.

Yeah, because both of my parents started their careers as teachers and I had two older brothers. Others who went through similar things weren't so lucky.

Quote:

The issue is about power and why does the federal government want to have provincial powers. It isn’t about childcare.

It is exactly about childcare. It's just the neo-conservative radical right who are afraid that if their kids get educated they might learn not to hate gays and understand that people didn't have pet dinosaurs.

Actually it's even simpler than that isn't it, JJ? It's about you being afraid that somebody might take thirty cents of your money to make sure that your neighbour's kid gets the same opportunity as your kid.

Quote:

I also say the people who try to centralize this nation are trying to destroy it.

I say it's the greedhogs who live in perpetual fear that somebody might actually get out from under their cloven hooves long enough to look around and ask questions that are destroying this country.
 
Jay
Avatar
#41
In another thread you said to me…

Quote:

You should argue facts instead of emotionally-based diatribes, Jay.


And you should too Rev.

And you should consider going back on your pills.

As tibear pointed out in another thread, you only come down on certain ppl around here. Vanni can say some of the most ridiculous untrue stuff, and you never comment on it; it slides by. You being (according to you) rather well read; I know you simply are letting it slid by. If I say anything in the slightest in opposition to your communism, you have a bird. It can't be good for your heart Dear.

I think that really this site shouldn’t be called Canadian Content, it should be Leftist Content. No right wing thinker is treated with any amount of respect around here. If you changed the name, you could attract the ppl you’re really looking for, and then perhaps the number of guests (being 45-75 every time I look at this site) would diminish. The lefties would know they fit in. I’m sure there are right wing thinkers out there who wouldn’t dare dream of speaking there mind around here, they would move on, or realize it isn't a well rounded Canadian site. I’m thick skinned, so I can take a lot of it, but the things that concern me and I want to discuss, like provincial powers etc, are deemed by you to be…

Quote:

It's just the neo-conservative radical right who are afraid that if their kids get educated they might learn not to hate gays and understand that people didn't have pet dinosaurs.

I think you should maybe go out and meet some of us right wingers Rev. (And your brother doesn’t count.) Maybe you can’t do that in Manitoba, maybe there isn’t anything but communists out there in the big wheat field, if so I feel sorry for you, and would love to invite you over to my house for beer, bongs and chat.

I don't let this get in the way of our fabulous relationship however.
 
Reverend Blair
#42
Quote:

If I say anything in the slightest in opposition to your communism

First things first...don't start calling people communists unless you want to be known as nazi-boy. You know nothing about the left and you have given no indication of an inclination to learn.

Quote:

Vanni can say some of the most ridiculous untrue stuff, and you never comment on it; it slides by.

Really? What has he said? What was the context? Can you supply links? If it was so offensive to you then why didn't you hit the "Report" button at the bottom of the post.

Quote:

I think that really this site shouldn’t be called Canadian Content, it should be Leftist Content.

Nonsense. It has members from all across the political spectrum. You are just not very happy about being spoken back to.

Quote:

No right wing thinker is treated with any amount of respect around here.

On the contrary, most have been given far more respect than they've earned.

Quote:

I’m sure there are right wing thinkers out there who wouldn’t dare dream of speaking there mind around here, they would move on, or realize it isn't a well rounded Canadian site.

Why? Because they might not get a positive response? I've got news for you JJ, most Canadians float around the centre of political spectrum. Lately there has been a bit of a cant to the left. That's reflected in polls and in the recent election.

Quote:

I’m thick skinned, so I can take a lot of it, but the things that concern me and I want to discuss, like provincial powers etc, are deemed by you to be…

Nonsense, that's out of context. In the next paragraph I clearly attributed your particular stance to personal greed.

Quote:

I think you should maybe go out and meet some of us right wingers Rev.

Um, I grew up in Saskatchewan, I live in Manitoba. About half of each province is conservative. Most of them aren't quite as radical as you (a lot of stances are similar to anachists, actually), but believe me...I speak to conservatives all of the time.

Quote:

Maybe you can’t do that in Manitoba, maybe there isn’t anything but communists out there in the big wheat field,

Geeze, there's a display of geographic and cultural ignorance that I've only seen matched by the dullest pedants of the radical right.
 
peapod
#43
Quote:
Vanni can say some of the most ridiculous untrue stuff, and you never comment on it; it slides by.

Actually I think its fair to say we have learned a little something from Fucci that is if you are a free thinking person.
 
peapod
#44
If you changed the name, you could attract the ppl you’re really looking for, and then perhaps the number of guests (being 45-75 every time I look at this site) would diminish.

ppl ppl...I just can't help it!!!! I gotta brag about what a great job the wizard has done with canadian content...he is to humble Canadian content has now surpassed AOL in traffic There might not be alot of people in the forum visiting..but there are sure lots of people reading this site...Andem has created a great website.
 
Reverend Blair
#45
Yay Andem!
 
Jay
Avatar
#46
Quote:

First things first...don't start calling people communists unless you want to be known as nazi-boy. You know nothing about the left and you have given no indication of an inclination to learn.

Ya. It’s really hard to pin NAZI on me because I’m not a socialist.

I do however believe Nazis are a superb reason, along with communists, to not be socialists, and there is no shortage of material around about the left, and don’t forget they do get power and they do have a record.

You haven’t offered me anything indicating I should think in the mindset of a lefty. In reality you’re pretty radical, and I think you know that.


Quote:

Really? What has he said? What was the context? Can you supply links? If it was so offensive to you then why didn't you hit the "Report" button at the bottom of the post.



To answer the last question first, I didn’t say it was offensive. I don’t really care enough what vanni or anybody says, or says about me around here. I’m not the type to go around hitting report buttons when people have things to say I don’t like, I leave that for others. He just offered the best material that I could think of off the top of my head.

I’ll leave the censorship to its rightful owners.


The first questions are answered here-ish.

http://www.canadiancontent.net/forum...-0-asc-90.html



Quote: Originally Posted by Vanni

That is where the line is drawn. It is not, nor has it ever been, a criminal offense to engage in homosexual activity.


You are so wrong it's unbelievable that you're still even trying to debate this...


Those laws that I quoted were from the Criminal Code of Canada and the issue is that those relationships you have been spouting off about are criminal offences with commensurate jail terms for violations


Thanks for the post Jay, I stand corrected, and any further posts on this topic will read "Not in my lifetime has homosexuality been illegal"...


Jay posted link:


http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/sa...hts/index.html


In the mean time Vanni is chewing Tibear out over it. It’s crazy.

And you weren’t much help. Later on, and in the same thread you said,

Quote:

If nobody answers challenges Observer's lies, then he is free to tell them. That's where that bigotry that caused the show in your link to be cut comes from.


So it’s not as if your not in the business. And you seem to know a lot about the issues at stake, but you didn’t know Vanni was way out on a rather sensitive particular in this topic.
Surprisingly, no one did, that surprised me with this cliental.


Quote: Originally Posted by Vanni

I for one am offended by your naivete, and seemingly willful ignorance... I think you should do more research, and less blathering...the truth is often not written in the history books,

http://www.canadiancontent.net/forums/about3640-15.html


Here he would like us to believe we need less discussion, more research but we can’t trust the history books.

I suppose that’s where he came up with the above “That is where the line is drawn” revelation of his, of coarse chewing tibear out while he’s doing it.



Quote:

Nonsense. It has members from all across the political spectrum. You are just not very happy about being spoken back to.

On the contrary, most have been given far more respect than they've earned.

I don’t mind feed back.

When I happened upon this site and joined I felt in order to break the cycle of “anybody who doesn’t think like we do, are right wing (insert favorite insult here)”, with yall are left wing (insert favorite insult here). It’s not a respectful environment as such.

Quote:

most Canadians float around the centre of political spectrum

And I’m not convinced you belong to this group.

Quote:

In the next paragraph I clearly attributed your particular stance to personal greed.

My personal greed as opposed to your greed; which extends far beyond personal. OK. Let’s get over each others greed. I just think mine is justified, and your greed isn’t, and I’m sure you feel the same way about me.

Quote:

Um, I grew up in Saskatchewan, I live in Manitoba. About half of each province is conservative. Most of them aren't quite as radical as you (a lot of stances are similar to anachists, actually), but believe me...I speak to conservatives all of the time.

Good I’m glad to hear it. Something tells me though conservative politics can play out differently in different provinces, and I don’t want to hear from your conservatives about my provincial matters.

Quote:

there's a display of geographic and cultural ignorance that I've only seen matched by the dullest pedants of the radical right.

Even the ones where you live?

I said it in context to your remarks, except I said it in jest.
 
Reverend Blair
#47
Quote:

Ya. It’s really hard to pin NAZI on me because I’m not a socialist.

It's pretty clear, in spite of the word socialist in their name, that the Nazis were fascists.

Quote:

You haven’t offered me anything indicating I should think in the mindset of a lefty. In reality you’re pretty radical, and I think you know that.

I'm further to left than a lot of people, but far from radical. This is further evidence that you know little or nothing of the left.

Quote:

The first questions are answered here-ish.

Gee, I see Vanni apologizing for making a mistake and promising to make the appropriate adjustments.

Quote:

nd you weren’t much help. Later on, and in the same thread you said,

Quote:
If nobody answers challenges Observer's lies, then he is free to tell them. That's where that bigotry that caused the show in your link to be cut comes from.

I did say that. I'll say it again too. Read his posts...he's here because he hates Canada and he freely admits that.

Quote:

So it’s not as if your not in the business. And you seem to know a lot about the issues at stake, but you didn’t know Vanni was way out on a rather sensitive particular in this topic.
Surprisingly, no one did, that surprised me with this cliental.

Am I supposed to fact check every post? I don't think Andem can afford a full-time fact checker...I charge a fair bit for that kind of work.

Quote:

I don’t mind feed back.

No, then why do you take it badly?

Quote:

And I’m not convinced you belong to this group.

I never claimed to belong to that group. I am, however, much closer to it than you are and actually look into the policies to see if I agree with them or not.

Quote:

My personal greed as opposed to your greed; which extends far beyond personal.

Nah, I like to share stuff.

Quote:

Something tells me though conservative politics can play out differently in different provinces, and I don’t want to hear from your conservatives about my provincial matters.

Why not? Yours are certainly never shy about yarkin' about Manitoba's provincial matters...no matter who is in power.

You've dragged this whole thing off topic though, JJ. I guess that's because you realized that there isn't a lot of support for your position.

Would you like us to start a thread for your attacks on the moderators? It might help you to stay on topic.
 
Jay
Avatar
#48
Quote:

It is the Canadian government that is trying to ensure that all Canadians have access to equal services.

At what cost? The cost of doing away with the provinces. I'm a citizen of Ontario, before I'm a citizen of Canada.

Quote:

You're wrong. Every single time a constitutional issue comes up, the provinces are there yelling and screaming. Raplh Klein is likely the worst.

What kind of a response is that to my statement?
The issue I'm talking about is the fact the feds can't keep their hands to their own powers they are consistently meddling in provincial powers, not vice versa. If the provinces do not stand up to the feds then they aren’t doing their job. Quebec's premier Bourassa (sp) didn't even talk to the feds for many years because of these issues. Once again the feds are doing the breaking up.
So I'm not wrong, you are, or you don't know better.

Quote:

So are you saying you're an American, JJ? That would explain the regressive political stances, I guess.

If I am then so is Stephan Dion as he said on CBC radio yesterday that Canada was a federation of provinces. And that is extremely close to saying a "union of states"
Ontario for all intents and proposes is a state. It is in another state called Canada.

I think you know this already, but incase you don't Mr. Dion and I have explained it. And FYI admitting that we are states doesn't make you an American.

Quote:

Apparently not, since we are talking about a national system.

You may talk about it, that’s fine, but do so with the understanding that these are provincial matters.
And this thread is named National Child care, a reason to do away with provinces.

Quote:

It sure as hell is. People didn’t move nearly as often or as far when I was a kid as they do now.

Is your wife a kid who moves a lot? No? Then you don't understand the problem.

We are talking about day care. One mention of the feds getting involved in daycare, and you've got them running education in all of Canada, because some kids move around. Give an inch; you take a mile or two. This is precisely why we cannot let the feds into education at all. They will not stop at daycare.

I did however ask my wife about kids who move around the country, and the problems they face. She says there aren’t any problems really; you just have to accommodate them, along with guidance. But she said she hasn't seen too many of them either. The numbers just aren’t there.
As we all know I live in Ontario. I moved from one board of education to the other and found differences in education, by moving across a river, let alone the country. In Ontario we believe in regional governments also, maybe it’s different where you come from.

Quote:

It is exactly about childcare. It's just the neo-conservative radical right who are afraid that if their kids get educated they might learn not to hate gays and understand that people didn't have pet dinosaurs.

Our kids, the radical right's that is, are educated, and then they go out and get jobs and fund socialist systems. I would consider being nice to them and not calling them names. And it just makes me wonder why you think they all hate gays? I mean we send them to your socialist schools...

You see radical right wingers don't send their kids to your socialist schools so the left can preach their peace, love and all corporations are bad all day. We do it because after the end of the day we pay for those schools through high taxes, so we can't send our kids to the schools we want. Schools are there to teach facts, not socialism, and we all know that that isn’t good enough for the left. It’s about hearts and minds isn’t it?

And if these socialist schools are so great, why are so many kids failing and being given riddlen and such. Public schools suck, oh well. We learn to live with them. Education in Ontario goes to hell, while the teacher’s pays get larger and larger, and larger.

My only pet dinosaurs are my tax bills. Anyone looking for new pet? You can have mine.

Quote:

Actually it's even simpler than that isn't it, JJ? It's about you being afraid that somebody might take thirty cents of your money to make sure that your neighbor’s kid gets the same opportunity as your kid.

No Rev it isn't that simple. That’s the way some see all this as, simple. It's complex.

If I was complaining about someone taking my thirty cents you would have a point, but it isn't thirty cents is it Rev? No its way greater than that. It may have started out with thirty cents, but when you start to bleed someone to death it starts with a drop of blood and ends up with a bloodless corps.

We need taxes. It’s a fact. Do we need to pay up and over 50% of our hard earned dollars to tax? NO

Quote:

I say it's the greedhogs who live in perpetual fear that somebody might actually get out from under their cloven hooves long enough to look around and ask questions that are destroying this country.

Yes one of us has gotten out from under the cloven hooves of the pig called socialism and looked around and realized its a farce, and it wasn't something they taught me in the socialist school system either, just like my rights weren’t taught to me there either, or politics or Canadian history…
 
Jay
Avatar
#49
Quote:

It's pretty clear, in spite of the word socialist in their name, that the Nazis were fascists.

Its hard to be a fascist with out socialism. Here are some Dictionary.com definitions:

Socialism: a political theory advocating state ownership of industry
2: an economic system based on state ownership of capital


Fascism: A system of government marked by centralization of authority under a dictator, stringent socioeconomic controls, suppression of the opposition through terror and censorship, and typically a policy of belligerent nationalism and racism.




Quote:

I'm further to left than a lot of people, but far from radical. This is further evidence that you know little or nothing of the left.

I would love to learn more about this left, but I believe the above dictionary quotes sum it up.


Quote:

Gee, I see Vanni apologizing for making a mistake and promising to make the appropriate adjustments.

Yes he did. He was also chewing poor tibear out over it. Not good.


Quote:

I did say that. I'll say it again too. Read his posts...he's here because he hates Canada and he freely admits that.

I know what he says. I just was using your post to demonstrate something.

Quote:

Am I supposed to fact check every post? I don't think Andem can afford a full-time fact checker...I charge a fair bit for that kind of work..

That’s not my point Dear. My point is I believe you saw it and knew better; your just on vanni's side, and didn't step in to let him know the error of his ways. I think you like to see vanni chew out Tibear, and aren’t interested in vanni truths or his BS.


Quote:

No, then why do you take it badly?

If I seem to take it badly, I apologize. Sure I might get a little hot under the collar, as you do. I'm actually new to the forum game, I may do a **** job of getting my points across with a keyboard, but hey I'm Canadian, I'm up for a challenge.


Quote:

I never claimed to belong to that group. I am, however, much closer to it than you are and actually look into the policies to see if I agree with them or not.

Sure you are. I'm arguing points of law, and who in Canadian politics concerns themselves with that, and if anyone does, their radicals. Yaddah, yaddah, yaddah.

I look into policies too Dear. I'm just not a swing vote. I also haven't seen to many policies from the left that are palatable at the moment. I beg them to convince me though.

Mike Harris, the conservative politician of Ontario once said to Ontarians. Vote for Conservative or vote NDP. He said we conservatives have a plan that will work, the NDP has a plan that will work, and the Liberals don't have a plan.

Radical people like you and me make this country what it is, Liberal.


Quote:

Nah, I like to share stuff.

So do I. And I won't just take your stuff either. Taxation isn't charity though, and when those little kids come to the door I buy their cookies, and we support MADD and Diabetes etc.



Quote:

Why not? Yours are certainly never shy about yarkin' about Manitoba's provincial matters...no matter who is in power.

I didn't know this. You could be right. I don't pay to much attention to Manitoba’s politics. I do know they tend to be more left though.

Quote:

You've dragged this whole thing off topic though, JJ. I guess that's because you realized that there isn't a lot of support for your position.

No that’s not why I did that. I did it to mention how I feel about things. This thread demonstrated a good place to do it. People ramble off topic all the time around here.

Quote:

Would you like us to start a thread for your attacks on the moderators? It might help you to stay on topic.

I actually didn't know you or peapod where moderators around here till very recently. If you wish to start a new thread, be my guest.
 
Reverend Blair
#50
Quote:

At what cost? The cost of doing away with the provinces. I'm a citizen of Ontario, before I'm a citizen of Canada.

It won't do away with the provinces though. That's just not accurate. It will be funded with federal money and they will set standards, and that is perfectly fair. If you don't want to participate as a province, then don't take the money. Opt out. Fund your own damned system. Ontario is just now getting around to moderninzing their education system so their kids finish high school at the same time as everybody else. Maybe you guys like being behind? Not my problem.

I'm a Canadian before I'm a Manitoban. Maybe that's because I've lived in four provinces, maybe it's because I've visited all of the provinces. I'm a Canadian first though.

Quote:

What kind of a response is that to my statement?

It's the kind of response you get when you say that the provinces never meddle in federal business.

Quote:

If I am then so is Stephan Dion as he said on CBC radio yesterday that Canada was a federation of provinces. And that is extremely close to saying a "union of states"
Ontario for all intents and proposes is a state. It is in another state called Canada.

Not even close. The relationship between the Canadian government and the provinces is far different than the relationship between the US government and the states.

Quote:

You may talk about it, that’s fine, but do so with the understanding that these are provincial matters.
And this thread is named National Child care, a reason to do away with provinces.

It isn't going to do away with the provinces though, that's nothing but a scare tactic.

Quote:

We are talking about day care. One mention of the feds getting involved in daycare, and you've got them running education in all of Canada, because some kids move around.

That's what I would like to see. I've told you exactly why too...because I moved from province to province when I was in school. It's a mess.

Quote:

I did however ask my wife about kids who move around the country, and the problems they face. She says there aren’t any problems really; you just have to accommodate them, along with guidance.

Guidance which largely isn't there because of cuts that conservative governments have made. I was one of those kids that was "accomodated" by the way, back when the funding was there. It was wholly inadequate because the curriculums are so far apart.

Quote:

As we all know I live in Ontario. I moved from one board of education to the other and found differences in education, by moving across a river, let alone the country.

Now multiply that difference by ten and consider that kids who move a long way are trying to adjust to a whole different culture as well.

Quote:

Our kids, the radical right's that is, are educated, and then they go out and get jobs and fund socialist systems.

No, they are educated then they go out and participate in a society that benefits them through its social programs. That includes their education and their health care.

Quote:

You see radical right wingers don't send their kids to your socialist schools so the left can preach their peace, love and all corporations are bad all day.

Your wife is a teacher, does she teach that? Bull****.

Quote:

We do it because after the end of the day we pay for those schools through high taxes, so we can't send our kids to the schools we want.

So you would prefer a system where the rich get educated and the poor don't. When the poor can't find jobs because of a lack of education you'll bitch that they are on welfare.

Quote:

Schools are there to teach facts

They do teach facts. Things like evolution.

Quote:

It’s about hearts and minds isn’t it?

If your accusations had any basis at all the NDP would be the right wing party in Canada. They aren't, so your accusations obviously have no basis at all.

Quote:

And if these socialist schools are so great, why are so many kids failing and being given riddlen and such. Public schools suck, oh well. We learn to live with them. Education in Ontario goes to hell, while the teacher’s pays get larger and larger, and larger.

You can always tell your wife to take a paycut...you seem to feel she's making too much money.

You seem to think that everything occurs in a vacuum. Maybe the kids are failing because social programs have been brutalized for twenty years and it's having an effect. Maybe the cuts to drug research programs and the sales programs of pharmaceutical companies have turned doctors into pill-pushers. Maybe when the conservatives forced wage erosion to take place so that both parents had to work the kids would do better.

Quote:

If I was complaining about someone taking my thirty cents you would have a point, but it isn't thirty cents is it Rev? No its way greater than that. It may have started out with thirty cents, but when you start to bleed someone to death it starts with a drop of blood and ends up with a bloodless corps.

You'll absolutely no pity from me. I was educated in another province, I have no kids, I pay school taxes. Is that fair? I think it is because it's good for Manitoba (and therefore me) to have an educated population. It's in my interest even though I get no direct benefit from it.

Quote:

We need taxes. It’s a fact. Do we need to pay up and over 50% of our hard earned dollars to tax? NO

Until the debt (most of it incurred by the Conservative Mulroney government) is paid off, there should be no tax cuts. You benefitted from the money that debt represents, JJ. You went to school, likely university, the doctor etc. You look at taxes as some sort of cash and carry thing. Sorry, you're paying for things you benefitted from and the mismanagement of a government you presumably supported.

Quote:

Yes one of us has gotten out from under the cloven hooves of the pig called socialism and looked around and realized its a farce, and it wasn't something they taught me in the socialist school system either, just like my rights weren’t taught to me there either, or politics or Canadian history…

You should take a look at government policy since the early eighties, JJ. It has been set very much by the corporate agenda. That's your boys, not mine.

Quote:

Socialism: a political theory advocating state ownership of industry
2: an economic system based on state ownership of capital

Again, you are demonstrating a lack of understanding and knowledge of the Canadian left. Do you understand how a mixed economy works? Do you understand why crown corporations exist? If you do, you sure as hell don't show it.

Quote:

I would love to learn more about this left, but I believe the above dictionary quotes sum it up.

I don't know how to tell you this JJ, but there's no Santa Claus, Easter Bunny, or Great Pumpkin.

Quote:

Yes he did. He was also chewing poor tibear out over it. Not good.

The one personal attack I saw, I edited. Just like I would have if you made it or tibear made it.

Quote:

I know what he says. I just was using your post to demonstrate something.

To demostrate what, that I talk back? Not exactly a secret.

Quote:

That’s not my point Dear. My point is I believe you saw it and knew better; your just on vanni's side, and didn't step in to let him know the error of his ways. I think you like to see vanni chew out Tibear, and aren’t interested in vanni truths or his BS.

Hey, I didn't know when homosexuality was made legal. I really didn't care either. What do you want me to do, demand that everybody footnote each and every post then check their references. Should we dictate writing style and correct spelling errors and typos too?

Quote:

Sure you are.

Just going by the polls. I was this way went the cant was to the right too, if that's any consolation.



Quote:

I'm arguing points of law, and who in Canadian politics concerns themselves with that, and if anyone does, their radicals.

Are you a lawyer...because there are a lot of other lawyers that do not agree with you.

Quote:

I also haven't seen to many policies from the left that are palatable at the moment. I beg them to convince me though.

I dunno...Kyoto, gay marriage, expanding the armed forces to meet our UN obligations and enforce our sovereignty, shutting down any participation in BMD. Those are pretty damned good policies.

Quote:

So do I. And I won't just take your stuff either. Taxation isn't charity though, and when those little kids come to the door I buy their cookies, and we support MADD and Diabetes etc.

I said nothing about charity, I said sharing. It's like when a community all gets together to build a town hall, or you call all your buddies over to help build a community rink. It builds unity and makes us all stronger and better.

Quote:

I didn't know this. You could be right. I don't pay to much attention to Manitoba’s politics. I do know they tend to be more left though.

I am right. Harris was bloody awful, especially when Filmon was still in charge here.

Quote:

No that’s not why I did that. I did it to mention how I feel about things. This thread demonstrated a good place to do it. People ramble off topic all the time around here.

Except you've done it in other threads. There's a pattern forming. I'm not a stickler for staying on topic, but it's been getting a little out of hand lately.

Quote:

I actually didn't know you or peapod where moderators around here till very recently. If you wish to start a new thread, be my guest.

I'll leave it up to you. If you want to start a thread to complain about moderators, check with Andem first. I have no problem with it though.

You say you're new to the forum game. Let me point out to you that CBC, Telus, History, and Sympatico all shut down amid rumours that it was because of flame wars, personal attacks, and even physical threats. A few other sites have come close. I mentioned some of my own personal experiences on another thread.

Nobody wants this place to become nasty, so if it seems like we react oddly at times it is likely because we've been down that path before and don't want to go down it again.
 
Paranoid Dot Calm
#51
Yuh Know;

I don't think this DayCare stuff is goin' anywhere.
It is just a scam to fill up the news day.
If it were that important, they would not of tossed the issue to a rookie MP.

If provincial governments refuse to have the Federal government involved with HealthCare .... why should we have any confidence that DayCare will be any different?

And ... people talk alot about paying too much taxes.
What these people say is that they want to starve the government of taxes in order to bring the government to it's knees.

What would be the difference if I said we should storm Parliament and cause a revolution?

Same sh?t.... different pile.

Except .... those that prefer starving the government of taxes can perform their revolution while sitting at home watching TV and complaining.
Whereas; those that encourage storming the Parliament are named as crazies and communists.
Each in their own way are just trying to revolutionize government.

I think that those willing to storm Parliament will be more apt to see progress.

Calm
 
tibear
#52
Heard Mike Duffy on the radio yesterday talking about a proposal the Liberals were working on about 10 years ago for childcare.

It appears that they had worked the numbers and showed that the best way to implement childcare was to give 300 Million directly to the parents of pre-school children and then have the parents decide what to do with the money. It was shown that in many cases, it was more advantageous for a family to have a parent stay at home rather than having both parents work and putting the children into daycare.

However, the feminists of the day in the Liberal party shot down the idea, because they believed that too many of the mothers would choose to stay at home with their children and not enter the workforce.
 
Jay
Avatar
#53
"It appears that they had worked the numbers and showed that the best way to implement childcare was to give 300 Million directly to the parents of pre-school children and then have the parents decide what to do with the money."

This is how all public schooling should be paid for.

If you can't afford education for your children, the government cuts you cheques for you to hand over to the school. If parents paid for education directly, they would have far more interest and control in the system. IMHO
 
Reverend Blair
#54
You have to have standards though, Jay. I know you don't like the idea, but sending kids out into the real world believing that the human race is 6,000 years old, the Big Bang Theory is a myth, man has dominion over the animals etc., is tantamount to neglect, if not outright child abuse.

That goes for all of school, but science and literature are the areas most likely to be abused.

Their is also the fact that children need to be socialised and in our modern society that means schools and pre-schools. Every working society in the world has recognized the need for education to certain standards.
 
Jay
Avatar
#55
"You have to have standards though, Jay."

Amazing, it almost sounds like you accept my idea as viable. I do want standards, just not national.

People send their kids to Catholic schools, and I doubt they teach them the human race is 6000 years old ( we all know it's at least 7000)

Science and lit won't be abused, all the greats in Lit and the writers of Western Cannon are written by Christians anyways (almost). You shouldn't fear us so.

Children need socialization as everyone does, but you can't tell parents they can't home school their children.


Why don't you believe Humans have dominion over animals?
 
Reverend Blair
#56
Quote:

Amazing, it almost sounds like you accept my idea as viable. I do want standards, just not national.

Then we already have educational standards. They don't work for kids who move, but there are standards.

Quote:

People send their kids to Catholic schools, and I doubt they teach them the human race is 6000 years old ( we all know it's at least 7000)

A lot teachers when I was in school would contradict what we were taught in science class. That was in Catholic school after the Pope had given evolution his official Okey Dokey. It was confusing and uncalled for, but at least because of the educational standards we were taught evolution too and the teachers never contradicted it during science class.

What happens in Christian schools where their leader hasn't okayed evolutionary theory? How many teachers will stand up in science class and say stupid things like, "This is only a theory," and gloss over the massive amount of evidence that supports it?

Quote:

Science and lit won't be abused, all the greats in Lit and the writers of Western Cannon are written by Christians anyways (almost). You shouldn't fear us so.

It's the Christian right that is known for burning books on this continent, Jay. Darwin, Steinback, Shakespeare, Sagan. They've after The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter and A Brief History of Time. It isn't fear, it's experience.

Quote:

Children need socialization as everyone does, but you can't tell parents they can't home school their children.

And we don't. We also don't pay them to do something that is available elsewhere.

Quote:

Why don't you believe Humans have dominion over animals?

Because scientific and historic fact shows us that the environment is a web and if we pull too many strings out of it the web collapses. If we have dominion over the earth and the animals (and plants) on it, then that wouldn't happen. The biblical tenet that gives us dominion has failed peer review.
 
Jay
Avatar
#57
Quote: Originally Posted by Reverend Blair

A lot teachers when I was in school would contradict what we were taught in science class. That was in Catholic school after the Pope had given evolution his official Okey Dokey. It was confusing and uncalled for, but at least because of the educational standards we were taught evolution too and the teachers never contradicted it during science class.

What happens in Christian schools where their leader hasn't okayed evolutionary theory? How many teachers will stand up in science class and say stupid things like, "This is only a theory," and gloss over the massive amount of evidence that supports it?

I'm not Catholic. I can't speak for them. Most of the Catholics I know my age have shunned their religion.




Quote:

It's the Christian right that is known for burning books on this continent, Jay. Darwin, Steinback, Shakespeare, Sagan. They've after The Lord of the Rings and Harry Potter and A Brief History of Time. It isn't fear, it's experience.

Thank God for the First Amendment.



Quote:

Because scientific and historic fact shows us that the environment is a web and if we pull too many strings out of it the web collapses. If we have dominion over the earth and the animals (and plants) on it, then that wouldn't happen. The biblical tenet that gives us dominion has failed peer review.

I think this would imply the earth is manageable.

Do you really think our domination of the earth is biblical? I don't.
 
Reverend Blair
#58
I don't think our domination of the earth is biblical, I think the attitudes that allow us to abuse and destroy our environment has strong ties to a religious tradition that came out of the Middle East. They already an historical eco-system collapse there, BTW.
 
lena
#59
Why can't I stay home with my kids?? I can't.......HOW DARE I STAY HOME WITH MY KIDS!!!!!! Please explain to me why....Just want to know...

Why should I pay for yours?? just a question..

IDIOTS that say "just because SHE/HE doesn't want to work are just that ASSHOLES...don't need to repy ....lol I'll take the warning now giggle
 
tibear
#60
lena,

I share your frustrations. It certainly does seem unfair that those who choose to stay at home with their children and reduce their lifestyle by living off the income of one parent must then help to pay for others who choose to go to work and have a higher standard of living.

Seems kind of weird. But the left doesn't want mothers(the vast majority of stay-at-home parents are mothers) to stay at home because it defeats their feminism objectives. Regardless of what the individual woman may want.


RB,

Isn't our animal domination a direct result of evolution where the strongest survive and thrive. We are the species that has the most ability to think and change so automatically it puts us at the top of the food chain and thus domination over all of the rest of the species. Doesn't it??
 

Similar Threads

0
Child Care Program Wanted
by FiveParadox | Mar 22nd, 2006
3
Child Care Protest in Ottawa
by FiveParadox | Mar 7th, 2006
7
no new posts