Liberals to run surplus instead of deficit for 2015 -2016

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Federal deficits won’t be as deep as Liberals’ outlook: budget watchdog

OTTAWA — The parliamentary budget office projects federal deficits in each of the next five years won't be as deep as those in Ottawa's forecasts.

A new report by the budget watchdog also contests the Liberal government's estimate that the public books will show a shortfall for 2015-16.

The analysis says Ottawa will run a $700-million surplus in 2015-16 as opposed to the $5.4-billion deficit projected in last month's federal budget.

The report says the federal books are on track to add a total of $90.8 billion to the public debt over the next half-decade — lower than the federal government's projection of $113.2 billion over the same period.

The budget office is expecting Ottawa to show a $20.5-billion deficit this year, which is $8.9 billion smaller than the Liberal government's prediction.

The Liberals have been accused of deliberately lowering expectations in their fiscal outlook by including larger-than-usual risk adjustments of $6 billion per year.

Finance Minister Bill Morneau has argued that incorporating the thicker layer of prudence in the budget is necessary because forecasters have been wrong in recent years

The parliamentary budget office expects the federal debt-to-GDP ratio to start falling in 2017-18, which it says indicates the federal fiscal structure is sustainable over the long term.

The office also projects Canada's real gross domestic product — a common measure of economic growth — to expand 1.8 per cent this year, 2.5 per cent in 2017 and average 1.6 per cent between 2018 and 2020.

Federal deficits won’t be as deep as Liberals’ outlook: budget watchdog | National Newswatch
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,844
93
48
A real gooey Clingon, cuz the 2015-2016 budget is the Harper surplus.
 

relic

Council Member
Nov 29, 2009
1,408
3
38
Nova Scotia
Mr Floss, you can't use logic on a rabid tory, and factcs just give them fits.
Wait for it............
 

relic

Council Member
Nov 29, 2009
1,408
3
38
Nova Scotia
And cap never disappoints. How many times has he used a variation of that line ? Like most cons,lacks imagination>
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
The reality still remains, stimulus spending will always be needed to continue our current financial system. It's a mathematical certainty, over a period of time of infinity.
To help understand it. Visualize a game of monopoly you are playing with friends. At first when there is land to buy and everyone can afford it, the game can be fun for all players, but as we move towards the end, one player who has developed monopolies eventually bankrupts everyone else and wins.

Essentially this is a simplified example of exactly what's happening today. Our memory of capitalism may be good, because of the success everyone had buying things at the beginning of the game, and the benefits those things gave us. But now that we near the end when a winner will eventually bankrupt us all, governments and people have to keep borrowing money to keep our financial game from achieving what the systems only possible end result is, and that's developing a winner.

In a competition of economics where it is the goal to win, it is a mathematical certainty that someone eventually will over a period of inifinity. One of us will bankrupt us all. One of us is already bankrupting us all, he will continue to bankrupt us until our government has no resources left to borrow from to stop the financial collapse that happens when one of us wins the game.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
146
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
And cap never disappoints. How many times has he used a variation of that line ? Like most cons,lacks imagination>

Ya see, it's far too easy in this case.

Budgets balancing themselves and terrorists are what they are because they feel left out.

You can't make this sh*t up.

Anywho...



Martin never had a surplus. He stole from EI to "balance" the books. As far as I know that money has not been repaid.

Stealing from the EI fund and hard cash payments in brown paper bags is the liberal way
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Recession doesn't mean there wasn't a surplus.
It would also mean there is no money to start doing the repairs so JT is under no obligation start fulfilling on the things that will cost money and his budget before an election gets done whether he wins or loses. Is that right so far?

. . . and the proof you know the kettle from the pot is to be found where??