I feel there is an elephant amongst this forum,why is that
The question I have asked upon the conclusion of some of my information adventures was where responsibility starts and ends in keeping good information stats on employees particularly high risk employees so that the employer can respond correctly.
In recent days Canadians have been put in a state of lugubrious denial,with the recent allegations of lewd conduct within the RCMP elite "explosive"department.Within my information auditing experience I was fortunate to have the experience to navigate amongst and through "local detachments"and as a result lobbied Ottawa for better oversight to high risk individuals within the RCMP and do real assessments of local detachments.These were the days in which I hoped people cared in the same way I did,I was wrong again.
I recall at this time,I had the good fortune to information audit part place of horrors,like the Cuban torture chambers,I really have not been interested inthe actions or conclusions,my interest was to assess managements capacity to be a silent,willfull blindness,arms length manager to real bad behaviour,the I don't know crowd,we all know them,even myself can be on a rare occassion be in a state of denial,but this is different ,
when management has no capacity or desire to assess detachments and the individuals who practice within these detachments,then I guess you can play the trump of all "We didn't know card".
I hoped managers would recognize high risk individuals,they refused to,so I took a different avenue of disclosure for assessing the management's ability to manage and more so the loyality they serve to their members,once I know I moved on.
this type of management harms the same type of people they should be protecting,I found this strange at the time,I feel sorry for lower rank individuals who have become victims of ignorant management,and believe
but sunny days my friend, I feel a bit of confidence with our new Commissioner,but I am reminded I have been hopeful for at least three previous commissioners,sunny days.
The auditing I was able to finish and conclude even if there is two dysfunctional individuals in a detachment ,thewhole detachment can be dysfunctional and navigate with unhealthy recipical aggreements,Ottawa prefers no mindfullness to the healthiness of their detachments,sometimes unhealthy was rewarded,sometimes over confidence was built into a system of dysfunction,management would remove themselves for taking responsibility,leaving individuals angry and in need of assistance.
communities and so much more pays the price for such dysfunction,but it is not Ottawa's problem.
should i have confidence in the process of the investigation in the owness of this lewd behaviour,the role of management and recipical agreements in such bad behaviour,they better not bow out of this one.
As I audited I wondered about management's ability to recognize something may be wrong in individuals they serve,I have always felt mental health in the RCMP is lame,that the investment is skimpy,particularly in recognizing behaviour of PTS,these lewd behaviours could be very symptomatic of PTS,but i guess if you don't have an honest assessment in place,it doesn't matter,the RCMP intervention is cheap and wrecks peoples lives.Recognizing sometimes peoples behaviour is symptom of their PTS takes good management,but it seems management encourages such behaviour.
I could write books on strange behaviour,particularly sexual behaviour and PTS
structure of the explosive detachment is going to be of interest to myself,hours worked,chain of command,psychology monitoring,it promises to be interesting,and if I was the Commissioner,i would start here,or have two seperate information identities assessing for information to make reccomendations,if warranted,the Commissioner should eat up any assistance to clear up such a humilating mess,and give up as much to assistance to everyone involved
couches and nudity is the name of this blog,this is not edited.
The question I have asked upon the conclusion of some of my information adventures was where responsibility starts and ends in keeping good information stats on employees particularly high risk employees so that the employer can respond correctly.
In recent days Canadians have been put in a state of lugubrious denial,with the recent allegations of lewd conduct within the RCMP elite "explosive"department.Within my information auditing experience I was fortunate to have the experience to navigate amongst and through "local detachments"and as a result lobbied Ottawa for better oversight to high risk individuals within the RCMP and do real assessments of local detachments.These were the days in which I hoped people cared in the same way I did,I was wrong again.
I recall at this time,I had the good fortune to information audit part place of horrors,like the Cuban torture chambers,I really have not been interested inthe actions or conclusions,my interest was to assess managements capacity to be a silent,willfull blindness,arms length manager to real bad behaviour,the I don't know crowd,we all know them,even myself can be on a rare occassion be in a state of denial,but this is different ,
when management has no capacity or desire to assess detachments and the individuals who practice within these detachments,then I guess you can play the trump of all "We didn't know card".
I hoped managers would recognize high risk individuals,they refused to,so I took a different avenue of disclosure for assessing the management's ability to manage and more so the loyality they serve to their members,once I know I moved on.
this type of management harms the same type of people they should be protecting,I found this strange at the time,I feel sorry for lower rank individuals who have become victims of ignorant management,and believe
but sunny days my friend, I feel a bit of confidence with our new Commissioner,but I am reminded I have been hopeful for at least three previous commissioners,sunny days.
The auditing I was able to finish and conclude even if there is two dysfunctional individuals in a detachment ,thewhole detachment can be dysfunctional and navigate with unhealthy recipical aggreements,Ottawa prefers no mindfullness to the healthiness of their detachments,sometimes unhealthy was rewarded,sometimes over confidence was built into a system of dysfunction,management would remove themselves for taking responsibility,leaving individuals angry and in need of assistance.
communities and so much more pays the price for such dysfunction,but it is not Ottawa's problem.
should i have confidence in the process of the investigation in the owness of this lewd behaviour,the role of management and recipical agreements in such bad behaviour,they better not bow out of this one.
As I audited I wondered about management's ability to recognize something may be wrong in individuals they serve,I have always felt mental health in the RCMP is lame,that the investment is skimpy,particularly in recognizing behaviour of PTS,these lewd behaviours could be very symptomatic of PTS,but i guess if you don't have an honest assessment in place,it doesn't matter,the RCMP intervention is cheap and wrecks peoples lives.Recognizing sometimes peoples behaviour is symptom of their PTS takes good management,but it seems management encourages such behaviour.
I could write books on strange behaviour,particularly sexual behaviour and PTS
structure of the explosive detachment is going to be of interest to myself,hours worked,chain of command,psychology monitoring,it promises to be interesting,and if I was the Commissioner,i would start here,or have two seperate information identities assessing for information to make reccomendations,if warranted,the Commissioner should eat up any assistance to clear up such a humilating mess,and give up as much to assistance to everyone involved
couches and nudity is the name of this blog,this is not edited.
