The big infrastructure ripoff

B00Mer

Keep Calm and Carry On
Sep 6, 2008
44,800
7,297
113
Rent Free in Your Head
www.getafteritmedia.com
The big infrastructure ripoff



No matter which political party is in power in the various Canadian jurisdictions, all are agreed on one issue – that Canada needs to urgently address the deterioration of our basic infrastructure. Whether it be potholed roads, crumbling overpasses, inadequate mass transit systems, long wait times for vital health care services or whatever, one would be hard-pressed to find any Canadian who would disagree that significant investment in infrastructure is needed.

A key issue that you won’t hear from governments in this discussion, however, is the guaranteed reality that Canadians will be paying much more for infrastructure refurbishment than they should have to as a result of a simple policy. That policy is that virtually all Canadian governments have over the past few decades enacted laws to restrict bidding on government projects to companies that are either unionized, or that effectively pay inflated union wages in some other fashion. Research has shown that this restriction means that Canadians will overpay for these projects by as much as 40 per cent. And when tens of billions of taxpayer dollars are at stake, this is a significant overpayment indeed.

Union-only or closed-tendering policies have perverse effect of excluding tax-paying businesses

How did such a blatantly wasteful and unfair practice come to pass? Basically, weak, ill-informed governments have caved in to selfish union interests over the years. Unions naturally favour these policies as they not only put lots of tax dollars in their pockets, but because businesses who want to compete for these projects might consider becoming unionized when it is otherwise against the best interests of the business to do so.

It is also worth questioning why our infrastructure has been neglected for so many years. It is certainly not because governments have been short of money, as Canadians continue to furnish our governments with healthy and increasing amounts of taxes. When we look at where our growing tax burden has been going, however, an excessive amount is continually streamed to ever more generous salaries, rich pensions, early retirements and other benefits for government workers. These costly perks are not enjoyed by the 80 per cent of us who do not work for government. A study recently published by the McDonald-Laurier Institute showed that federal government employees take about twice as many sick days as do private sector workers. Why? Because government managers turn a blind eye to this abuse and they have zero incentive to use our tax dollars efficiently. Other research has shown that something as simple as government employees taking the same number of sick days as their private sector counterparts would in and of itself free up billions that could go to much better uses, such as legitimate infrastructure and other tangible improvements to public services. Many more billions would be available if government employees were compensated comparable to workers doing the same job in the private sector.

Most governments in Canada are now being very creative in cooking up new “revenue tools” – read new taxes – to pay for so-called infrastructure. Government unions are salivating at the prospect of these new monies, seeing a good proportion of them going to hike their already excessive pay and benefits. The bottom line is that if governments would quit wasting tens of billions of our money on stupid, unfair policies such as union-only procurement and excessive pay, benefits and sick leave for government workers, Canada would have untold billions to devote to real benefits for Canadians without having to raise any taxes and further hobble our struggling economy.

Catherine Swift is Spokesperson for Working Canadians, a voice to counter excessive union influence over government, our economy and society.

source:: The big infrastructure ripoff | Financial Post

...........................

Trudeaunomics - The Budget will balance itself.
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
The unions will spend money in the businesses and communities the bridge was built to reach. So your going to screw the villagers to save the princes of industry. Your accounting sucks.

When a 3rd world country has a better infrastructure than Canada, I'm concerned.







https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carretera_Federal_95D

What contry is that?

All those people you hate spend the money they aquired in Canada mostly while the biggest pork goes to Switzerland.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
Well I agree with paying union wages and prefer to see union jobs and
the real reason for the problem is the governments of the past since
around 1980 have saved us all taxes and put off fixing or maintaining
our infrastructure and now the repairs are overdue. In fact instead of
repairs some of the projects need to be replaced.
Most of the contracts end up being paid in US dollars so now they will
be even more expensive. Neglect by governments for 30 years is the
reason we will pay more, not union wages or unions getting the tender.
People should not receive inferior pay because we didn't want to do the
repairs when they needed to be done.
 

Ludlow

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 7, 2014
13,588
0
36
wherever i sit down my ars
The unions will spend money in the businesses and communities the bridge was built to reach. So your going to screw the villagers to save the princes of industry. Your accounting sucks.



What contry is that?

All those people you hate spend the money they aquired in Canada mostly while the biggest pork goes to Switzerland.
stop yer whining already
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Well I agree with paying union wages and prefer to see union jobs and
the real reason for the problem is the governments of the past since
around 1980 have saved us all taxes and put off fixing or maintaining
our infrastructure and now the repairs are overdue. In fact instead of
repairs some of the projects need to be replaced.
Most of the contracts end up being paid in US dollars so now they will
be even more expensive. Neglect by governments for 30 years is the
reason we will pay more, not union wages or unions getting the tender.
People should not receive inferior pay because we didn't want to do the
repairs when they needed to be done.

That's because first we fix banks, which is very important, the bridge will settle in the spring, perhaps even square with it's footing, it will be secured and next year the other end will snap off. We can't fall behind in bank payments fixxing bridges.
 

Liberalman

Senate Member
Mar 18, 2007
5,623
35
48
Toronto
So BOOMer you are saying the fly by night building contractors that do sub standard work that scam seniors they should do the work? Union workers do a better job just because they want to keep their high paying jobs but they can only work with the building materials the company gets. It's up to the government to do their due diligence on bidders before they award the contract. They should also re-evaluate the decision to do construction in the winter
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta
I can't remember the last time we hired a unionized contractor. I don't even know of any. I'm going to ask around at the operators seminar at Banff but I suspect this is another load of nonsense
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
The big infrastructure ripoff



No matter which political party is in power in the various Canadian jurisdictions, all are agreed on one issue – that Canada needs to urgently address the deterioration of our basic infrastructure. Whether it be potholed roads, crumbling overpasses, inadequate mass transit systems, long wait times for vital health care services or whatever, one would be hard-pressed to find any Canadian who would disagree that significant investment in infrastructure is needed.

A key issue that you won’t hear from governments in this discussion, however, is the guaranteed reality that Canadians will be paying much more for infrastructure refurbishment than they should have to as a result of a simple policy. That policy is that virtually all Canadian governments have over the past few decades enacted laws to restrict bidding on government projects to companies that are either unionized, or that effectively pay inflated union wages in some other fashion. Research has shown that this restriction means that Canadians will overpay for these projects by as much as 40 per cent. And when tens of billions of taxpayer dollars are at stake, this is a significant overpayment indeed.

Union-only or closed-tendering policies have perverse effect of excluding tax-paying businesses

How did such a blatantly wasteful and unfair practice come to pass? Basically, weak, ill-informed governments have caved in to selfish union interests over the years. Unions naturally favour these policies as they not only put lots of tax dollars in their pockets, but because businesses who want to compete for these projects might consider becoming unionized when it is otherwise against the best interests of the business to do so.

It is also worth questioning why our infrastructure has been neglected for so many years. It is certainly not because governments have been short of money, as Canadians continue to furnish our governments with healthy and increasing amounts of taxes. When we look at where our growing tax burden has been going, however, an excessive amount is continually streamed to ever more generous salaries, rich pensions, early retirements and other benefits for government workers. These costly perks are not enjoyed by the 80 per cent of us who do not work for government. A study recently published by the McDonald-Laurier Institute showed that federal government employees take about twice as many sick days as do private sector workers. Why? Because government managers turn a blind eye to this abuse and they have zero incentive to use our tax dollars efficiently. Other research has shown that something as simple as government employees taking the same number of sick days as their private sector counterparts would in and of itself free up billions that could go to much better uses, such as legitimate infrastructure and other tangible improvements to public services. Many more billions would be available if government employees were compensated comparable to workers doing the same job in the private sector.

Most governments in Canada are now being very creative in cooking up new “revenue tools” – read new taxes – to pay for so-called infrastructure. Government unions are salivating at the prospect of these new monies, seeing a good proportion of them going to hike their already excessive pay and benefits. The bottom line is that if governments would quit wasting tens of billions of our money on stupid, unfair policies such as union-only procurement and excessive pay, benefits and sick leave for government workers, Canada would have untold billions to devote to real benefits for Canadians without having to raise any taxes and further hobble our struggling economy.

Catherine Swift is Spokesperson for Working Canadians, a voice to counter excessive union influence over government, our economy and society.

source:: The big infrastructure ripoff | Financial Post

...........................

Trudeaunomics - The Budget will balance itself.

Lots of flaws in that article. So many in fact I don't know where to begin except to say that no one that has never bid on a government contract can grasp the reality of bidding them.

Yeah using yaks and oxen.

And slave labour.