Take it from official bilingualism.
According to the Fraser Institute, fulfilling the linguistic provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms costs taxpayers 2.4 billion yearly.
Given that promoting our languages but not theirs is as unfair as underfunding their schools, taking money from subsidies to our languages to fund their schools would kill two birds with one stone in promoting more equaity between us.
Of course it would mean opening the Constitution, but if English and French Canadians are serious about reconciliation, they'd do it.
Heck, if they're serious about just saving money they'don't do it.
2.4 billion a year is a nice chunk of money. Sure it would mean English speakers in Quebec and French speakers elsewhere would have to learn a second language, but given that indigenous Canadians have to do that already and even learn a third language to access government employment, it's clearly unfair for them to then also have to subsidize the 'right' to English and French monolingualism.
Actualky, I'd support a clause in the Constitution stating that no government is allowed to promote any language other than a sign language, the local indigenous language, or an international auxiliary language like Esperanto. I'd add that unidentified orphans who cannot speak any language should attend school in the local indigenous,language and learn an international auxiliary language as a default until the age of fifteen after which they could choose their language. This would create more jobs for speakers of these languages in orphanages and the school system while also finally promoting a common easy-to-learn second language for all Canadians.
Given that the government of Canada would have no interest in promoting any of these languages, we'd likely end up with a less statist and much freer linguistic market in Canada no longer reserving jobs for English and French Canadians and opening them up to all Canadians instead.
According to the Fraser Institute, fulfilling the linguistic provisions of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms costs taxpayers 2.4 billion yearly.
Given that promoting our languages but not theirs is as unfair as underfunding their schools, taking money from subsidies to our languages to fund their schools would kill two birds with one stone in promoting more equaity between us.
Of course it would mean opening the Constitution, but if English and French Canadians are serious about reconciliation, they'd do it.
Heck, if they're serious about just saving money they'don't do it.
2.4 billion a year is a nice chunk of money. Sure it would mean English speakers in Quebec and French speakers elsewhere would have to learn a second language, but given that indigenous Canadians have to do that already and even learn a third language to access government employment, it's clearly unfair for them to then also have to subsidize the 'right' to English and French monolingualism.
Actualky, I'd support a clause in the Constitution stating that no government is allowed to promote any language other than a sign language, the local indigenous language, or an international auxiliary language like Esperanto. I'd add that unidentified orphans who cannot speak any language should attend school in the local indigenous,language and learn an international auxiliary language as a default until the age of fifteen after which they could choose their language. This would create more jobs for speakers of these languages in orphanages and the school system while also finally promoting a common easy-to-learn second language for all Canadians.
Given that the government of Canada would have no interest in promoting any of these languages, we'd likely end up with a less statist and much freer linguistic market in Canada no longer reserving jobs for English and French Canadians and opening them up to all Canadians instead.