Niqab-ban case has cost government $257,000 so far

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
And worth every penny.


Niqab-ban case has cost government $257,000 so far

The government has so far spent at least $257,000 on its legal fight to prevent would-be Canadians from taking the oath of citizenship while wearing face coverings.

The cost estimate is contained in a government response to an order-paper question filed in April by Liberal MP Sean Casey.

The news comes on the same day the federal government says it will ask a judge to put a hold on a related court decision allowing citizenship candidates to wear face coverings while taking the oath.

Conservative candidate Denis Lebel, Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Quebec lieutenant, said the government will seek a stay of a recent Federal Court of Appeal decision this week quashing the so-called niqab ban.

In that case, Zunera Ishaq, a devout, 29-year-old Muslim woman from Pakistan, successfully argued the government ban violates the Citizenship Act, which says candidates must be allowed the greatest possible religious freedom when they take the oath.

Before writing and passing her citizenship test two years ago, Ishaq removed her niqab for an official, but legally fought having to do so at a public oath-taking ceremony.

Niqab-ban case has cost government $257,000 so far
 

Machjo

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 19, 2004
17,878
61
48
Ottawa, ON
And worth every penny.


Niqab-ban case has cost government $257,000 so far

The government has so far spent at least $257,000 on its legal fight to prevent would-be Canadians from taking the oath of citizenship while wearing face coverings.

The cost estimate is contained in a government response to an order-paper question filed in April by Liberal MP Sean Casey.

The news comes on the same day the federal government says it will ask a judge to put a hold on a related court decision allowing citizenship candidates to wear face coverings while taking the oath.

Conservative candidate Denis Lebel, Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Quebec lieutenant, said the government will seek a stay of a recent Federal Court of Appeal decision this week quashing the so-called niqab ban.

In that case, Zunera Ishaq, a devout, 29-year-old Muslim woman from Pakistan, successfully argued the government ban violates the Citizenship Act, which says candidates must be allowed the greatest possible religious freedom when they take the oath.

Before writing and passing her citizenship test two years ago, Ishaq removed her niqab for an official, but legally fought having to do so at a public oath-taking ceremony.

Niqab-ban case has cost government $257,000 so far

It's part of the economic action plan to help struggling lawyers.

Why do they wear these things?

Why does it spend that money?
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Probably hasn't cost us anywhere near that much since the government lawyers will be paid regardless of what they do. It is nice to see them do something for the citizens for a change instead of looking for ways to screw us.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Probably hasn't cost us anywhere near that much since the government lawyers will be paid regardless of what they do. It is nice to see them do something for the citizens for a change instead of looking for ways to screw us.

 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
What is a conbot ? It is not in my dictionary .

Defined in Canada in 2009-2010 to describe Conservative party supporters who blindly (like robots) support the dictums and policies of the current Conservative leadership.

These are persons who repeat catch phrases, simplistic policies without defending them with analysis or justification. They tend in droves to news web sites where they comment en masse to castigate opposing views without argument or defending their policies, using repetition and slurs to make their case.

Most Canadian Conservative cabinet ministers are Conbots. Everything for them is scripted by the Prime Minister's Office.

Urban Dictionary: Conbot

See CDNBear.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Defined in Canada in 2009-2010 to describe Conservative party supporters who blindly (like robots) support the dictums and policies of the current Conservative leadership.

These are persons who repeat catch phrases, simplistic policies without defending them with analysis or justification. They tend in droves to news web sites where they comment en masse to castigate opposing views without argument or defending their policies, using repetition and slurs to make their case.

Most Canadian Conservative cabinet ministers are Conbots. Everything for them is scripted by the Prime Minister's Office.

Urban Dictionary: Conbot

See CDNBear.
Bwaaahahaha!!!

Can you show me where I explicitly support all of Harpers policies please. Quotes or screen shots are the only acceptable evidence.

I'll wait.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,653
6,994
113
B.C.
Defined in Canada in 2009-2010 to describe Conservative party supporters who blindly (like robots) support the dictums and policies of the current Conservative leadership.

These are persons who repeat catch phrases, simplistic policies without defending them with analysis or justification. They tend in droves to news web sites where they comment en masse to castigate opposing views without argument or defending their policies, using repetition and slurs to make their case.

Most Canadian Conservative cabinet ministers are Conbots. Everything for them is scripted by the Prime Minister's Office.

Urban Dictionary: Conbot

See CDNBear.
Well that is an apt description . What do you call yourself ?
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
You have that much patience
Not really, he'll never actually do it, not that he'll find anything that can support "Yes blindly follow an overwhelming majority of conbot policy.".

He's simply a mindless parrot. Anyone that calls him on his sh!t, is a conbot. Even if they (Like myself) sit further left than he does, lol.

A skeptic.
Bwaaahahaha!!!! Is that what you hipster douche bags call left wing ideologues these days?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Meanwhile, an NDP candidate in Quebec who disapproves of the wearing of niqabs during citizenship ceremonies wants the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms amended.

“Thomas Mulcair is ready to open the Constitution for the Senate, so why wouldn’t he be ready to open it up on this issue?” said Jean-François Delisle in an interview with The Canadian Press in Lac-Mégantic, Que.


Niqab-ban case sparks fresh political battles | Ottawa Citizen