What's Harper got against manufacturers?

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
An OECD study reported in the Globe shows that Canada has dropped out of the top ten in research and development spending and now ranks 12th. While we de-industrialize and fall back on raw resource exports, previously underdeveloped countries -- Taiwan, India and Brazil -- are now outspending us as they industrialize.


We continue to decline in the World Economic Forum's World Competitiveness Index as well. For 2014-2015 we rank 15th.




Even worse, in the category of "innovation and sophistication factors" we rank 25th.


In 1998 our overall rank was sixth.


Canada's dramatic decline in research and development has a continuing negative impact on labour productivity as well. According to OECD figures for the year 2012, we stood at 73 per cent of the U.S. benchmark of 100. This failure to increase labour productivity through investment in new machinery and innovation has had a huge impact on our standard of living and the domestic economy: as wages stagnate and personal debt increases, domestic consumption starts to flatline -- and that further suppresses investment.




So what does Stephen Harper do? He rewards corporate ineptness and irresponsibility by providing one of the lowest corporate tax rates in the 34-nation OECD. It doesn't matter that all this free money just goes into the cash reserves of the country's largest companies (now totalling over $600 billion). Why doesn't it matter? Because Stephen Harper doesn't actually care if they invest in anything. The point of his tax cuts was never to stimulate investment -- it was to jettison government revenue in aid of dismantling the activist state and making it impossible for future governments to act.


The only sector Harper even thinks about is oil and gas. If that seems a bit over the top have a look at the Carol Goar's Toronto Star story on the phantom $200-million fund to stimulate Ontario manufacturing. The money, formally announced a year ago, was slated for something called the Advanced Manufacturing Fund and it was first mentioned in February last year. The goals were laudable, including: "To support transformative technologies and foster collaboration between universities and the private sector."


The problem, says Goar (using information dug up by the NDP's Peggy Nash) is that "To date, not a single project has been approved. Not one dollar has been released. Not one job has been created."


Two-hundred million might sound like a lot of money to promote manufacturing in one province, but the fact is that given Canadian corporations' appalling record of investment in innovation and "sophistication of company operations and strategy," government engagement is absolutely critical. The manufacturing and high tech sectors are in desperate need of the kind of guidance that can only come from a smart industrial strategy. Otherwise Canada faces a continued decline in its value-added sectors and export markets. Ontario has lost 300,000 manufacturing jobs in the last ten years -- that's more than one in four.


If the goal is to create "transformative technologies" (the word green comes to mind) then $200 million is just lunch money. But the Harper government is so opposed to government intervention it can't even bring itself to spend the money it actually allocated.




more




Why Canada's Job Future Is Sinking like a Stone | The Tyee
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Until manufacturing comes back to our shores (I have no doubt they will).
Why waist money on research & development?

As long as we stay the course and keep consuming we will be just fine.
 

JamesBondo

House Member
Mar 3, 2012
4,158
37
48
The thread title has nothing to do with the article. I'd love to see moderator bump these threads into the members only section.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,395
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
Harper is about investors. He doesn't understand people who actually get their hands dirty - probably because wages interfere with corporate profit

Other way around. There is no money in corporate taxes but there is in taxing high paid workers. Investors pay personal taxes on investment income at the same rate as labour.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
We have muzzled science anyway because science is not in keeping with social conservatism
there is a hard wind about to blow as the election comes around and no one should think it will
be a cake walk for any party they all have a lot of explaining to do
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Harper is about investors. He doesn't understand people who actually get their hands dirty - probably because wages interfere with corporate profit

No, he understands he's not elected to micro manage companies. And the hard labor needed.
He is elected to oversee a plan on a vision of Canada.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
It has everything to do with the cost of production of which taxes plays a small part and is about the only part Harper has any control over. The main problem is the high union wages manufacturers must pay in Canada as opposed to third world countries that have low wages, no unions and next to no environmental rules. It would be political suicide to make environmental rules here competitive. You just can't have it both ways.

Science hasn't been muzzled.



Do the Feds get dividends?

Indirectly through CPP Also some money from product licensing.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
It has everything to do with the cost of production of which taxes plays a small part and is about the only part Harper has any control over. The main problem is the high union wages manufacturers must pay in Canada as opposed to third world countries that have low wages, no unions and next to no environmental rules. It would be political suicide to make environmental rules here competitive. You just can't have it both ways.

Even if we eliminate union wage. China devalues their current currency 1/6 to ours.

So one of our dollars is worth 6 of theirs. We would need to work for 3$ a day to compete.

So we print none stop to devaluate our currency until China loses faith in our economy and
Makes their own reserve currency. (They are in the process of doing this)

At that point some manufacturing will return to America.

To blame union wage is simple minded crab mentality. No one can compete Paying 3$ a hour here in Canada.

You simply hate unions. But they are the reason we enjoy labor laws.
 
Last edited:

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Even if we eliminate union wage. China devalues their currencurrent 1/6 to ours.

So one of our dollars is worth 6 of theirs. We would need to work for 3$ a day to compete.

So we print none stop to devalue our currency until China loses faith in our currency and
Makes their own reserve currency.

At that point manufacturing will return to America.

To blame union wage is simple minded crab mentality.

Not at all. We could compete with china on quality alone and pay slightly over minimum wage because we have a shipping advantage. But we cannot pay $100000+ a year to a guy that installs the left front tire on an assembly line.
 

Angstrom

Hall of Fame Member
May 8, 2011
10,659
0
36
Not at all. We could compete with china on quality alone and pay slightly over minimum wage because we have a shipping advantage. But we cannot pay $100000+ a year to a guy that installs the left front tire on an assembly line.

Where are you getting this information?
Out of you're a$$?

At minimum wage we still don't compete.
China's devaluations is by design, to make it impossible for us to compete.

It's economic warfare

What China didn't anticipate is that we would simply devaluate our currency as fast as they devaluate theirs.
And since we are the reserve oil currency we have no concequences to printing like crazy.

It's a race to the bottom with us on top of the pyramid.

Once China values their currency properly manufacturing will return to America.
 
Last edited:

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,395
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
You are right. There is no way we can compete again a ratio of 6:1. They may make squat but their cost of living is SFA.

My friend bought a new 2 BDR hi-rise condo in Pudong for $55,000. Something like that in downtown TO or Vancouver would be 10X as much minimum.

It's tempting to sell out and live like a rock star in Shanghai.