Evan Solomon spent much of Power and Politics trying to get Con MP Erin O-Toole to respond (link is external) to recently revealed records showing nearly 900 job positions eliminated across Veterans Affairs with the biggest cuts going to the Disability Awards branch.
"How are these (management bonuses) backroom cuts", asked Solomon, "when some people might call them front line services?"
O'Toole didn't answer the question directly, instead opting for various bizarre defences like this one at the 5:17 mark: (see video at above link)
"The Veterans Independence Program was notoriously cumbersome. I think all MPs heard about the bills for snow removal, lawn maintenance, house cleaning. We're pre-approving now and so some of these changes have led to less paperwork."
What's he on about? More troops have taken their own lives since than were killed in action in Afghanistan and he's going on about lawn maintenance and paperwork. But ok, let's go with that.
In April 2012, over two and a half years ago, Veterans Affairs Minister Steven Blaney (link is external)announced veterans would no longer have to pay for the services upfront and then submit individual receipts for services to the federal government for reimbursement. Instead they would receive the payments upfront.
"It's all about cutting red tape," said Blaney.
Sounds good.
But here's what Major Mark Campbell (link is external), who lost both his legs in Afghanistan in 2008 and is one of six vets taking the government to court in BC, had to say about the changes to that very VIP program four days priorto O'Toole's remarks [10:00 mark]: "What the government says on the one hand with the spin and denials, and what I see on the other hand as a recipient, a client of Veterans Affairs, are two very different things. And this is the problem - there is a fundamental disconnect between what the government is saying and what we veterans, especially the new veterans under the new Veterans Charter, are actually experiencing on the ground. I mean we're seeing reductions in the Veterans Independence Program for lawn care and house care. Under the new grant program they didn't bother to tell us that under the new needs matrix by and large results in about a 50% reduction in the previous benefit."
Major Mark Campbell is a powerful advocate for the Equitas-backed court case (link is external). If you're curious about what it's like for new veterans to deal with "an insurance company like Veterans Affairs" when their injuries exceed the allowed financial payout limits, here ya go ... Also an excellent summation of the whole debacle.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjVxhA2IvV0&feature=player_embedded
source of this post: Creekside: Erin O'Toole and "an insurance company like Veterans Affairs"
please include them from now on.
"How are these (management bonuses) backroom cuts", asked Solomon, "when some people might call them front line services?"
O'Toole didn't answer the question directly, instead opting for various bizarre defences like this one at the 5:17 mark: (see video at above link)
"The Veterans Independence Program was notoriously cumbersome. I think all MPs heard about the bills for snow removal, lawn maintenance, house cleaning. We're pre-approving now and so some of these changes have led to less paperwork."
What's he on about? More troops have taken their own lives since than were killed in action in Afghanistan and he's going on about lawn maintenance and paperwork. But ok, let's go with that.
In April 2012, over two and a half years ago, Veterans Affairs Minister Steven Blaney (link is external)announced veterans would no longer have to pay for the services upfront and then submit individual receipts for services to the federal government for reimbursement. Instead they would receive the payments upfront.
"It's all about cutting red tape," said Blaney.
Sounds good.
But here's what Major Mark Campbell (link is external), who lost both his legs in Afghanistan in 2008 and is one of six vets taking the government to court in BC, had to say about the changes to that very VIP program four days priorto O'Toole's remarks [10:00 mark]: "What the government says on the one hand with the spin and denials, and what I see on the other hand as a recipient, a client of Veterans Affairs, are two very different things. And this is the problem - there is a fundamental disconnect between what the government is saying and what we veterans, especially the new veterans under the new Veterans Charter, are actually experiencing on the ground. I mean we're seeing reductions in the Veterans Independence Program for lawn care and house care. Under the new grant program they didn't bother to tell us that under the new needs matrix by and large results in about a 50% reduction in the previous benefit."
Major Mark Campbell is a powerful advocate for the Equitas-backed court case (link is external). If you're curious about what it's like for new veterans to deal with "an insurance company like Veterans Affairs" when their injuries exceed the allowed financial payout limits, here ya go ... Also an excellent summation of the whole debacle.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjVxhA2IvV0&feature=player_embedded
source of this post: Creekside: Erin O'Toole and "an insurance company like Veterans Affairs"
please include them from now on.
Last edited by a moderator: