Why Teddy 'Scrooge' Ballgame Didn't Give To The Book Fund

TeddyBallgame

Time Out
Mar 30, 2012
522
0
16
- Yesterday I visited my neighbourhood Coles bookstore to buy some books for relatives and for my own Christmas reading. (For me I scored Keith Richard's autobiography on sale marked down to $8 from $35 and since I had met and socialized with Keith in Barbados in 1986 I had been meaning to buy the book ever since it came out. Richards is only one month older but much older looking than me and I still chuckle over his comment at the time, "I guess I must have aged a f#ck of a lot in 30 days, mate".)

- Anyhow, when it came time to pay for my books the attractive young woman who was new to the store asked me if I wanted to contribute to the book fund. I asked about the fund and she explained that it was used by Chapters/Coles to provide new books to local schools "since they can't afford all of the books they need".

- I explained to her that I would not be contributing to this book fund because the reason schools had no money to buy books for their students was that about 82 cents of every education dollar went right into the pockets of the teachers and other staff in inflated salaries, extravagant perks and unsustainable pensions, thereby leaving no room in the budget for such trivial things as books, computers, science equipment, new desks and chairs, etc.

- I further explained that during the nine years of gross mismanagement by the departing Ontario premier DOLTon McGuilty, the teachers unions were given - until this year - everything they really wanted and that most teachers in elementary schools now made $92,000 and change and most teachers in seconardy schools made $94,000 and change.

- This intelligent young woman employed in the knowledge business was taken aback and remarked that a teacher she knew, a fellow university graduate, was only making in the low 40s in her first year as a teacher. I explained to her that her friend merely had to show up for the next ten years, stay out of jail and the asylum, take a few easy summer courses and that she would climb automatically and rapidly to the $94,000 plus bracket by the time she completed eleven years of teaching. Of course, I told her, this was the current rate, McGuilty had raised teachers' salaries by over 30% in just eight years, and so the actual rates ten years from now would be way over $100,000.

- Seeing her eyes bug out, I went on to explain that the teachers' pension plan was ridiculously extravagant and clearly unsustainable and that it was worth more than three times what the pension plan of an equivalent private sector professional would be. Under the teachers' plan, I elaborated, one could teach for 35 years and then take early retirement to collect a guaranteed pension of 70% of the average of one's best three teaching years and see this pension increase automatically each year by the cost of living. Given current life expectancies, I observed that more and more teachers wouls actually be able to collect their lavish taxpayer subsidized pensions for several years longer than they had teached. As her eyes bugged out again, I added that these exorbitant public pensions were not merely totally unfair compared with private sector norms but also had driven several US municipalities into bankruptcy with others (e.g. Detroit) to come and were also threatening to bring down California and other US states.

- Having educated my young friend from the knowledge business in the realities of Ontario teachers' deals, I closed by observing that Ontario used to be the unquestioned and runaway leader in the country in terms of educational standards and test results but that the leader almost every year for the past decade was Alberta and that Ontario was frequently found in the bottom half among the ten provinces in achievement tests. This, too, shocked the Coles bookstore employee.

- Perhaps from now on she'll get her national and provincial and local news from several papers and channels rather than just from The Toronto Red Tsar and the Collectives BSing Corporation. But probably not.

- However, at least I got the chance to explain my Scrooge-like refusal to donate to the book fund and to educate this young lady about education in Ontario and why the kids are nothing but pawns and increasingly helpless and penniless pawns in the games the monopoly public sector education unions play.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
As much as I hate to admit it I have to somewhat agree with you on this one Teddy. I don't have a problem with public sector workers getting 5-10% more than their private sector equivalent and a decent benefit package but it would appear to me the norm these days is double the median income or 3-4 times a private sector employee and a gold-plated benefit package. I long for the days when pensions were collected at 65 and based upon contributions.

This is not limited to teachers. I read recently the average compensation (salary, benefits, pensions etc) for a federal govt employee is now $114,000/yr. Considering the median income in Canada is still in the low $40,000 range I find it ludicrous. I don't foresee it changing anytime soon either. Who is going to make a smaller, more cost effective and efficient govt when so much of the workforce lives off these lucrative, one-way deals funded by those of us that work for a living.
 

TeddyBallgame

Time Out
Mar 30, 2012
522
0
16
1/ As much as I hate to admit it I have to somewhat agree with you on this one Teddy.

2/ This is not limited to teachers. I read recently the average compensation (salary, benefits, pensions etc) for a federal govt employee is now $114,000/yr. Considering the median income in Canada is still in the low $40,000 range I find it ludicrous.

3/ I don't foresee it changing anytime soon either. Who is going to make a smaller, more cost effective and efficient govt when so much of the workforce lives off these lucrative, one-way deals funded by those of us that work for a living.

- PN ... 1/ I quite understand your reluctance to agree with me. I am reluctant to have you agree with me and had to go to the trouble of questioning my entire position on the subject when I learned that you did agree with me.

2/ No, it certainly isn't limited to teachers but in fact encompasses all of the occupational groups represented by the monopoly public sector unions who have an unbridlede power unmatched by private sector unions which is why FDR and most other sensible political leaders believed that unions, collective bargainign adn the right to strike were unwise and unworkable in the public sector.

3/ A good question and the crunch question. It is true that an increasing perecentage of the labour force is in the greater public sector and taking full advantage of the monopoly public sector unions' abilities to hold the taxpayers to ransome and extort sweetheart deals that result in needless numbers of public employees with inflated compensation and laughably low productivity norms. They will vote for and canvass for and contribute to the big government parties rather than the parties that try to represent the otherm 80% of the population by providing value for tax money. And even when the more conservative parties actually do something sensible in the public's financial interest, it is generally glossed over or ignored by the liberal MSM and said parties get no political credit. A current example is the long overdue reform to MPs' pensions driven through the House by PM Harper. MPs' pensions have long set a terrible example for the public sector and been a giant rip off of the taxpayers. They reached their peak under the Gliberals and Chretien and he particularly feathered his own nest by doubling the PM's pension. Under Harper, the MPs' plan has been reduced to a defined contributions plan in which the MPs contribute 50% to their pension fund. If actuarial tables prove accurate, this will remove over $2 million from Harper's PM pension. Does anybody know or care? Probably not.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
nice to see that teddy is staying true to form and not doing anything to change my opinion of his selfish self centered self.

Since the unions and teachers are getting more than he thinks they should.... then screw the kids. Kudos teddy, a true scrooge you are. Hopefully the young lady you laid your bullshyte on was able to see through it and see the true reason you weren't willing to help. You don't give a crap about the kids and are just too damn cheap.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
- PN ... 1/ I quite understand your reluctance to agree with me. I am reluctant to have you agree with me and had to go to the trouble of questioning my entire position on the subject when I learned that you did agree with me.

2/ No, it certainly isn't limited to teachers but in fact encompasses all of the occupational groups represented by the monopoly public sector unions who have an unbridlede power unmatched by private sector unions which is why FDR and most other sensible political leaders believed that unions, collective bargainign adn the right to strike were unwise and unworkable in the public sector.

3/ A good question and the crunch question. It is true that an increasing perecentage of the labour force is in the greater public sector and taking full advantage of the monopoly public sector unions' abilities to hold the taxpayers to ransome and extort sweetheart deals that result in needless numbers of public employees with inflated compensation and laughably low productivity norms. They will vote for and canvass for and contribute to the big government parties rather than the parties that try to represent the otherm 80% of the population by providing value for tax money. And even when the more conservative parties actually do something sensible in the public's financial interest, it is generally glossed over or ignored by the liberal MSM and said parties get no political credit. A current example is the long overdue reform to MPs' pensions driven through the House by PM Harper. MPs' pensions have long set a terrible example for the public sector and been a giant rip off of the taxpayers. They reached their peak under the Gliberals and Chretien and he particularly feathered his own nest by doubling the PM's pension. Under Harper, the MPs' plan has been reduced to a defined contributions plan in which the MPs contribute 50% to their pension fund. If actuarial tables prove accurate, this will remove over $2 million from Harper's PM pension. Does anybody know or care? Probably not.

You have no idea how much it hurts to agree with you but I am a fiscal conservative. Gee must be xmas since we are all so agreeable . But I care about the hit Harper took to press his point. I think the point is lost on the greedy public service unions.
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
You have no idea how much it hurts to agree with you but I am a fiscal conservative. Gee must be xmas since we are all so agreeable . But I care about the hit Harper took to press his point. I think the point is lost on the greedy public service unions.

I too am the fiscal conservative. Something Teddy never figured out. I have some socialistic morals but believe in reasonable pay equality over the public/private sectors and a balanced govt budget. I have even at times suggested a constitutional amendment requiring our govts to not run a deficit except for times of war (when we are attacked that is, not following the US into their BS invasions) or national disaster.

I too am impressed by Harper's moves on MP's pensions as well as his action on the long gun registry. In fact I agree with him on quite a bit. I just wish he was slightly more socially responsible.

nice to see that teddy is staying true to form and not doing anything to change my opinion of his selfish self centered self.

Since the unions and teachers are getting more than he thinks they should.... then screw the kids. Kudos teddy, a true scrooge you are. Hopefully the young lady you laid your bullshyte on was able to see through it and see the true reason you weren't willing to help. You don't give a crap about the kids and are just too damn cheap.

G, it is not about them getting more than TB thinks they should. It is about them getting too much entirely. Especially when our standard of education is dropping faster than a skydiver without a chute. There are many teachers out there that just phone it in and teach to the lowest standard allowed who make double the median income, get 3 months holiday every year and have a gold-plated pension & benefits package. I wouldn't mind so much if they worked their a$$es off all year and gave our kids everything they need but sadly they don't, they just reap the benefits of many years of holding our children hostage to get what they demand.
 

gerryh

Time Out
Nov 21, 2004
25,756
295
83
G, it is not about them getting more than TB thinks they should. It is about them getting too much entirely. Especially when our standard of education is dropping faster than a skydiver without a chute. There are many teachers out there that just phone it in and teach to the lowest standard allowed who make double the median income, get 3 months holiday every year and have a gold-plated pension & benefits package. I wouldn't mind so much if they worked their a$$es off all year and gave our kids everything they need but sadly they don't, they just reap the benefits of many years of holding our children hostage to get what they demand.


So that means we should tell the kids "screw you" because the teachers have gold plated salaries.
So the kids get screwed at both ends, but then again, people like teddy get's to hold onto his money all the while acting all "holier than thou".
 

PoliticalNick

The Troll Bashing Troll
Mar 8, 2011
7,940
0
36
Edson, AB
So that means we should tell the kids "screw you" because the teachers have gold plated salaries.
Absolutely not! We should tell the teachers 'screw you' and pay them a fair wage for doing their job and if they cannot increase the standards of our children's education then fire their a$$es and find someone who can.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
Actually this is nothing more than a disguised rant against public sector workers and the unions.
I have no problem with paying for education, we want people who are well educated and paid
accordingly In many communities if we had lower paid people we would be paying more taxes
to make up for what these people were not contributing.
In addition, the private sector has not been offering wages that are realistic for the education
levels of people who invested their time into a career.
Whining about the unions has become a literary objective for some so I guess its what ever turns
ones crank. I wouldn't take it out on our children though, but the grinch would, and I am not a grinch
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Actually this is nothing more than a disguised rant against public sector workers and the unions.
I have no problem with paying for education, we want people who are well educated and paid
accordingly In many communities if we had lower paid people we would be paying more taxes
to make up for what these people were not contributing.
In addition, the private sector has not been offering wages that are realistic for the education
levels of people who invested their time into a career.
Whining about the unions has become a literary objective for some so I guess its what ever turns
ones crank. I wouldn't take it out on our children though, but the grinch would, and I am not a grinch

How do private sector wages compare with public sector wages?
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
-

- Anyhow, when it came time to pay for my books the attractive young woman who was new to the store asked me if I wanted to contribute to the book fund. I asked about the fund and she explained that it was used by Chapters/Coles to provide new books to local schools "since they can't afford all of the books they need".

- I explained to her that I would not be contributing to this book fund because the reason schools had no money to buy books for their students was that about 82 cents of every education dollar went right into the pockets of the teachers and other staff in inflated salaries, extravagant perks and unsustainable pensions, thereby leaving no room in the budget for such trivial things as books, computers, science equipment, new desks and chairs, etc.

- I further explained that during the nine years of gross mismanagement by the departing Ontario premier DOLTon McGuilty, the teachers unions were given - until this year - everything they really wanted and that most teachers in elementary schools now made $92,000 and change and most teachers in seconardy schools made $94,000 and change.

- This intelligent young woman employed in the knowledge business was taken aback and remarked that a teacher she knew, a fellow university graduate, was only making in the low 40s in her first year as a teacher. I explained to her that her friend merely had to show up for the next ten years, stay out of jail and the asylum, take a few easy summer courses and that she would climb automatically and rapidly to the $94,000 plus bracket by the time she completed eleven years of teaching. Of course, I told her, this was the current rate, McGuilty had raised teachers' salaries by over 30% in just eight years, and so the actual rates ten years from now would be way over $100,000.

- Seeing her eyes bug out, I went on to explain that the teachers' pension plan was ridiculously extravagant and clearly unsustainable and that it was worth more than three times what the pension plan of an equivalent private sector professional would be. Under the teachers' plan, I elaborated, one could teach for 35 years and then take early retirement to collect a guaranteed pension of 70% of the average of one's best three teaching years and see this pension increase automatically each year by the cost of living. Given current life expectancies, I observed that more and more teachers wouls actually be able to collect their lavish taxpayer subsidized pensions for several years longer than they had teached. As her eyes bugged out again, I added that these exorbitant public pensions were not merely totally unfair compared with private sector norms but also had driven several US municipalities into bankruptcy with others (e.g. Detroit) to come and were also threatening to bring down California and other US states.

- Having educated my young friend from the knowledge business in the realities of Ontario teachers' deals, I closed by observing that Ontario used to be the unquestioned and runaway leader in the country in terms of educational standards and test results but that the leader almost every year for the past decade was Alberta and that Ontario was frequently found in the bottom half among the ten provinces in achievement tests. This, too, shocked the Coles bookstore employee.


- However, at least I got the chance to explain my Scrooge-like refusal to donate to the book fund and to educate this young lady about education in Ontario and why the kids are nothing but pawns and increasingly helpless and penniless pawns in the games the monopoly public sector education unions play.


I hope she listened to your explanation well and becomes a teacher..................
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
I would have just said "No thanks".

My tongue dries out when I talk too much and people find me disagreeable when I eyeball them.

Aside from that, I'm all for books and junk. But please, Keith was put away wet.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
I too am impressed by Harper's moves on MP's pensions as well as his action on the long gun registry. In fact I agree with him on quite a bit. I just wish he was slightly more socially responsible.



.

Considering the $600 billion debt (the country is broke) the reason for that may partly be lack of funds. Some would argue the troughs in Ottawa are too large, but I guess even if that was rectified the debt would still be $599 billion!
 

TeddyBallgame

Time Out
Mar 30, 2012
522
0
16
Actually this is nothing more than a disguised rant against public sector workers and the unions.
I have no problem with paying for education, we want people who are well educated and paid
accordingly In many communities if we had lower paid people we would be paying more taxes
to make up for what these people were not contributing.
In addition, the private sector has not been offering wages that are realistic for the education
levels of people who invested their time into a career.
Whining about the unions has become a literary objective for some so I guess its what ever turns
ones crank. I wouldn't take it out on our children though, but the grinch would, and I am not a grinch

- Even though your general views as a docterinaire former union leader are well known and you are from The Left Coast so you may have been a public rather than a privagte sector union leader, do you seriously expect anyone here with an IQ higher than his or her belt size in inches to believe that there is not a great deal of difference between public and private sector collective bargaining and strikes?

- Are you also utterly blind to what has happened in Greece and is happening right now to so many American cities and states due to the unsustainable cost of bloated governments with needless numbers of public employees drawing inflated pay and perks and grossly inflated pensions?

- Perhaps you are childless and have an "I'm alright Jack so screw the kids`attitude toward the econiomic and fiscal future of this country.

- Fortunately and somewhat to my pleasant surprise, the responses in this thread show that a number of board members actually are concerned about the economic and fiscal future of this country and our children and realize the increasingly punative drag that excessive public sector costs are putting on our economy and our finances.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
-

- Perhaps you are childless and have an "I'm alright Jack so screw the kids`attitude toward the econiomic and fiscal future of this country.

- Fortunately and somewhat to my pleasant surprise, the responses in this thread show that a number of board members actually are concerned about the economic and fiscal future of this country and our children and realize the increasingly punative drag that excessive public sector costs are putting on our economy and our finances.

I thought Grumpy had made it plain (on several occasions) that he is NOT childless (by a long shot)!-:)

As repugnant as it is I must admit I do have to whole heartedly agree with you that public sector costs are exorbitant. When will people understand that unions only add to the cost of a product? Don't get a swelled head as I doubt if we'll be agreeing often!
 

TeddyBallgame

Time Out
Mar 30, 2012
522
0
16
nice to see that teddy is staying true to form and not doing anything to change my opinion of his selfish self centered self.

Since the unions and teachers are getting more than he thinks they should.... then screw the kids. Kudos teddy, a true scrooge you are. Hopefully the young lady you laid your bullshyte on was able to see through it and see the true reason you weren't willing to help. You don't give a crap about the kids and are just too damn cheap.

- If you are really a `Hall of Fame`member here then Heaven help us and the Hall of fame.

- Clearly, you are too obtuse to be able to understand the big picture problem that I have outlined in the opening post in this thread or the excellent supporting comments from others such as taxslave and PoliticalNick and perhaps should have confined yourself to just adding your usual childish and asinine reddie to my post.

- As well, I would suggest that you don`t make value judgements on the generosity or greed of posters here whom you actually know next to nothing about lest you be considered somewhat irrational and unbalanced. In my case, you have no idea how much of my own money and time I have actually given to legitimate charities and to specific families and individuals both here and during my lengthy stay in Nigeria not to mention what I have paid in individual and business taxes through the years to fund government programs such as for buying books for students. But let me assure you that I have paid more in taxes and also freely given more in donations than 90 some percent of Canadians. And I seriously doubt that you have the record and the cred to lecture me on this.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
- If you are really a `Hall of Fame`member here then Heaven help us and the Hall of fame.

- Clearly, you are too obtuse to be able to understand the big picture problem that I have outlined in the opening post in this thread or the excellent supporting comments from others such as taxslave and PoliticalNick and perhaps should have confined yourself to just adding your usual childish and asinine reddie to my post.

- As well, I would suggest that you don`t make value judgements on the generosity or greed of posters here whom you actually know next to nothing about lest you be considered somewhat irrational and unbalanced. In my case, you have no idea how much of my own money and time I have actually given to legitimate charities and to specific families and individuals both here and during my lengthy stay in Nigeria not to mention what I have paid in individual and business taxes through the years to fund government programs such as for buying books for students. But let me assure you that I have paid more in taxes and also freely given more in donations than 90 some percent of Canadians. And I seriously doubt that you have the record and the cred to lecture me on this.

A real philantropist- most of the genuine ones are anonymous!
 

TeddyBallgame

Time Out
Mar 30, 2012
522
0
16
I would have just said "No thanks".

My tongue dries out when I talk too much and people find me disagreeable when I eyeball them.

Aside from that, I'm all for books and junk. But please, Keith was put away wet.

- Locutus ... When I decline to support something, I believe that I generally owe the person soliciting the support an explanation of why I declined to support him or his cause. In this case, the new Coles person was genuinely shocked by the data and analysis I presented to her and is now a more informed person because of this. And I didn`t eyeball her, she eyeballed me when I presented my case for declining to support her cause. Be assured that I may be longer in the tooth now but not so old that my eyeballs were not focused rather lower down that where her eyes were located.

- As for Keith, my wife and I had dinner with him and his wife Pattie in Barbados at the Sandy Lane and they were good company. He was clearly a musical genius, had a great sense of humour and of fun, and seemed a genuinely nice, down to earth guy. He spoke about many people including his early idol (and one of mine) Jerry Lee Lewis and his friend and enemy and collaborator for decades Mick Jagger. I got the feeling that while Keith felt that Mick was the more educated and sophisticated of the two (e.g. Jagger had attended the London School of Economics, was more business than musically oriented, and at the time I met Keith was a friend of Canada`s then finance minister Michael Wilson), he also felt that he himself was the better musician of the two. .

- It was funny how I met Keith. My wife and I were there for a couple of weeks at Christmas and had a small corner ground floor suite right next to the beach in a hotel on the west coast of the island. Unknown to us, Keith and some family and friends were renting the villa next door that was about 20 feet from our suite.

- In Barbados, the beaches belong to everybody. So the morning after we arrived, I decided to clear out the alcoholicallly induced cobwebs with a brisk walk along the beach heading south toward Bridgetown. Maybe 100 feet from our suite I noticed this leather faced white guy looking somewhat like a vagrant lying semi-comatose in the sand. I noticed him because I almost stepped on him, accidentally kicking or at least nudging some sand in his face. Stopping and bending down to apologize, I found to my amazement that it was the wild man himself, Keith Richards. He was very good humoured about it and we got to talking. Richards always liked Canada and Canadians and I knew Margaret Trudeau`s friendly drug supplier in Ottawa (a radio guy not a hard core criminal) and Keith, err, `knew`Margaret Trudeau so we started yacking about that and went on for over an hour. During our two weeks in Barbados, we got together a few more times including the dinner at Sandy Lane.

- A couple of times during the Stones`concert visits to Toronto, Keith has taken the trouble to track me down and get us tickets to the concerts and back stage passes. A great guy!

A real philantropist- most of the genuine ones are anonymous!

- JLM ... As you bloody well know, the only reason I mentioned this at all is that this gerrhy lefty moron who now puts reddies beside all of my posts falsely accused me on the basis of no evidence or information whatsoever of being a selfish cheapskate.

- I did not elaborate with details because it really is nobody`s business but mine and those whom I have been happy to be able to help.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,617
2,365
113
Toronto, ON
Sometimes a simple "No Thank You" is all that is required at the checkout stand. I know the guy behind you in line certainly would think so.

The teachers pension fund owned the Leafs for a bit so some of their pension money would have come from suckers who watched losers on the ice and paid a huge sum of money for that privelage rather than the taxpayers.