CBC Gets The Vapors Over Award Of Diamond Jubilee Medals To Pro-Life Activists


Locutus
#1
via bcf:

MP defends giving Queen's Jubilee medal to jailed woman



Two convicted criminals, one of them still serving time, have been awarded Queen's Diamond Jubilee medals by a Conservative MP.

Linda Gibbons, a grandmother who has spent 10 years on and off in prison for violating injunctions in front of abortion clinics, and Mary Wagner, who is in jail in Toronto charged with mischief and breaching court orders at abortion clinics, have both received the special medals that commemorate the Queen's 60 years on the throne.


Two convicted criminals! Oh Mercy CBC! Not a whisper about Morgentaler's Order Of Canada?

Blazing Cat Fur: CBC Gets The Vapors Over Award Of Diamond Jubilee Medals To Pro-Life Activists

MP defends giving Queen's Jubilee medal to jailed woman - Politics - CBC News
 
TenPenny
#2
Quote: Originally Posted by LocutusView Post

Two convicted criminals! Oh Mercy CBC! Not a whisper about Morgentaler's Order Of Canada?


What was Morgentaler convicted of?
 
karrie
No Party Affiliation
#3
Quote: Originally Posted by LocutusView Post


Two convicted criminals! Oh Mercy CBC! Not a whisper about Morgentaler's Order Of Canada?


MP defends giving Queen's Jubilee medal to jailed woman - Politics - CBC News

I don't know, this article about it, from the CBC, gives the whole story and certainly doesn't read like 'the vapors'. Oh, and it talks about Morgentaler's Order of Canada too.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
+2
#4
Labelling these women as "criminals" may be a bit of a stretch!
 
TenPenny
+3
#5  Top Rated Post
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Labelling these women as "criminals" may be a bit of a stretch!

Are/were they not in jail?

Doesn't that make them criminals?
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#6
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

Are/were they not in jail?

Doesn't that make them criminals?

Not all people in jail are criminals!

Anymore than all people who aren't in jail aren't criminals.
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
#7
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Not all people in jail are criminals!

Anymore than all people who aren't in jail aren't criminals.

I would think if you are convicted of a crime (and therefore in jail) you are a criminal. There are criminals who have not been caught yet.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#8
Quote: Originally Posted by IdRatherBeSkiingView Post

I would think if you are convicted of a crime (and therefore in jail) you are a criminal..

Hmmmmmm! I think "criminal" is a mindset more than a location!
 
The Old Medic
Conservative
+1
#9
Wonderful news. Anyone that defends life SHOULD be rewarded. Human babies are NOT disposable, and abortion on demand should be stopped permanently!
 
relic
Free Thinker
+2
#10
Well then,to take your arguement even further,masterbating should also be banned,that's a waste of a potential baby.
Thos "activists" were put in jail for a reason,they broke the law,they are not heroes to anybody,except the idiots that support them
 
CDNBear
+1
#11
Quote: Originally Posted by TenPennyView Post

Are/were they not in jail?

Doesn't that make them criminals?

Quote: Originally Posted by IdRatherBeSkiingView Post

I would think if you are convicted of a crime (and therefore in jail) you are a criminal. There are criminals who have not been caught yet.

Guy Paul Moran.
 
damngrumpy
No Party Affiliation
#12
First of all this is beginning to sound like a proof is a proof is a proof.
One who is in jail might or might not be a criminal it depends on the
offence they committed. Were they in breach of an order or a criminal
breach of an order there is a difference. A breach of an order is for
civil disobedience which is part of the democratic process and the latter
is for repeated offences. I don't think it was made clear in the article.
I question whether they should have been given awards but then some
times people get awards for things I don't agree with and that is just the
way it works in an open society. It is nice to know we can question
anything without going to jail, with some I agree and others I don't but I
am sure someone else has a different opinion.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#13
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

Guy Paul Moran.

Nelson Mandela.

Quote: Originally Posted by damngrumpyView Post

First of all this is beginning to sound like a proof is a proof is a proof.
One who is in jail might or might not be a criminal it depends on the
offence they committed. Were they in breach of an order or a criminal
breach of an order there is a difference. A breach of an order is for
civil disobedience which is part of the democratic process and the latter
is for repeated offences. I don't think it was made clear in the article.
I question whether they should have been given awards but then some
times people get awards for things I don't agree with and that is just the
way it works in an open society. It is nice to know we can question
anything without going to jail, with some I agree and others I don't but I
am sure someone else has a different opinion.

Many people have been held in jail because they can't raise bail or pay a fine!

Quote: Originally Posted by IdRatherBeSkiingView Post

I would think if you are convicted of a crime (and therefore in jail) you are a criminal. There are criminals who have not been caught yet.

So when would you cease to be a criminal? Upon your release? After 6 months? After 50 years?
 
CDNBear
+2
#14
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Nelson Mandela.

Mandela was a criminal.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#15
Quote: Originally Posted by CDNBearView Post

Mandela was a criminal.

I wasn't there but I'd bet lots would disagree!
 
CDNBear
+2
#16
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

I wasn't there but I'd bet lots would disagree!

That's because it's fashionable.

Leading bombing campaigns, being the commander of the armed wing of the ANC, are easily overlooked by the trendy.
 
IdRatherBeSkiing
#17
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

So when would you cease to be a criminal? Upon your release? After 6 months? After 50 years?

For me, if you had your conviction overturned (Guy Paul Moran). For you, perhaps there are no criminals.

But since this isn't an official designation, it really doesn't matter. But one should be exempt from getting awards or benifits of society when one is serving time for a crime.
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#18
Quote: Originally Posted by IdRatherBeSkiingView Post

For me, if you had your conviction overturned (Guy Paul Moran). For you, perhaps there are no criminals.

But since this isn't an official designation, it really doesn't matter. But one should be exempt from getting awards or benifits of society when one is serving time for a crime.

Not sure I agree, if you can be punished for doing something bad, why would that exempt you from being rewarded for doing something good? I would question getting an award for the same deed you are in jail for.
 
DaSleeper
+1
#19
Isn't that what happened to Morgentaler

Went to jail for performing illegal abortions in Quebec , then when they became legal ....got the order of Canada for it??????
 
JLM
No Party Affiliation
#20
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeperView Post

Isn't that what happened to Morgentaler

Went to jail for performing illegal abortions in Quebec , then when they became legal ....got the order of Canada for it??????

While I'm not a fan of Morgantaler, there are varying opinions about him.

It was probably done by a different entity than did the jailing.
 
DaSleeper
+2
#21
And the difference is???????
 
eh1eh
#22
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeperView Post

Isn't that what happened to Morgentaler

Went to jail for performing illegal abortions in Quebec , then when they became legal ....got the order of Canada for it??????

He got the order of Canada for promoting civil rights.

 
DaSleeper
+2
#23
Quote: Originally Posted by eh1ehView Post

He got the order of Canada for promoting civil rights.

Which was performing abortions

Word gymnastics...
 
eh1eh
#24
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeperView Post

Which was performing abortions

Word gymnastics...

No. The right to get an abortion. Plain and simple words.
 
DaSleeper
+1
#25
You can put the spin on it that you like....but you can't deny the fact that he received the order of Canada for doing what he went to Jail for, years earlier..period!!!
 
eh1eh
#26
Quote: Originally Posted by DaSleeperView Post

You can put the spin on it that you like....but you can't deny the fact that he received the order of Canada for doing what he went to Jail for, years earlier..period!!!

OK, I see, so he did. I didn't get the spin you were putting on it.
None the less, those people who got this award for what they went to jail for were and probably still are trying to take away the ability for women to get an abortion which currently is what I spin it to be, a civil right in Canada. Well actually, no spin, it is a right here.
If someone takes away one of your civil rights I hope they get an award.
 
Nuggler
#27
........Plus, there's all that "unreported crime" that got the Cons knickers in knots.................
 
Goober
Free Thinker
+3
#28
Quote: Originally Posted by eh1ehView Post

OK, I see, so he did. I didn't get the spin you were putting on it.
None the less, those people who got this award for what they went to jail for were and probably still are trying to take away the ability for women to get an abortion which currently is what I spin it to be, a civil right in Canada. Well actually, no spin, it is a right here.
If someone takes away one of your civil rights I hope they get an award.

Canada is in all probability the only country in the world that has no restrictions on Abortion.

Abortions based upon sex selection - Legal

Aborting a twin due to financial reason - That is OK to.

Late term abortion after the feus is viable- say after 6 months - hell even after 7 months- Yep That is legal as well.
 
Nuggler
#29
Quote: Originally Posted by GooberView Post

Canada is in all probability the only country in the world that has no restrictions on Abortion.

Abortions based upon sex selection - Legal

Aborting a twin due to financial reason - That is OK to.

Late term abortion after the feus is viable- say after 6 months - hell even after 7 months- Yep That is legal as well.



Wait for it. Stevo the clean ain't done yet.

He WILL tell women what to do.

He WILL ensure rape victims carry to term and birth.

IT'S just going to take the ****er a bit of time to go back to the 1800's.

Have patience. The con prince ain't done yet.

CANADA!!!..???......Shyte we won't recognize anything by the time that ****er is hung in chains.
 
Goober
Free Thinker
+2
#30
Quote: Originally Posted by NugglerView Post

Wait for it. Stevo the clean ain't done yet.

He WILL tell women what to do.

He WILL ensure rape victims carry to term and birth.

IT'S just going to take the ****er a bit of time to go back to the 1800's.

Have patience. The con prince ain't done yet.

CANADA!!!..???......Shyte we won't recognize anything by the time that ****er is hung in chains.

Inflammatory BS. You know it - I know it -

Do you agree with abortions based upon the points I brought forward. Yes or no for each point please.
 
no new posts