David Suzuki: Climate change deniers are almost extinct

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
David Suzuki: Climate change deniers are almost extinct

By David Suzuki, August 21, 2012

Most North Americans know that human-caused global warming is real, even if political leaders don’t always reflect or act on that knowledge. According to a recent poll, only two percent of Canadians reject the overwhelming scientific evidence that Earth is warming at alarming rates—a figure that may seem surprising given the volume of nonsense deniers (many of them funded by the fossil fuel industry) spread through letters to the editor, blogs, radio call-ins, and website comments.

Polling indicates more deniers live in the U.S., but they still make up just 15 percent of that population.

It’s getting harder to ignore the evidence: record high worldwide temperatures; increasing extreme weather events; devastating droughts, floods, and wildfires; animal and plant species turning up where they’ve never been found before; record ice loss in the Arctic and Greenland; melting glaciers… The trends are exactly as climate scientists predicted.

Meanwhile, one of the few “skeptic” climate scientists, Richard Muller, recently reversed his thinking. Muller and colleagues at the University of California, Berkeley, studied climate data dating back to 1753, then looked at possible causes of the unusual warming observed since the mid-1950s. (Ironically, the study was funded in part by the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation, founded by climate change skeptics with heavy interests in the fossil fuel industry.)

Their conclusion? It’s not the sun. It’s not volcanoes. The most likely cause is humans spewing massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, mainly by burning fossil fuels. This isn’t news to most climate scientists.

As evidence builds, deniers are starting to change their tune. They once said global warming isn’t happening, and some claimed the world is actually cooling. Now, heat records are being broken worldwide—this past decade was the hottest on record. Many scientists say the situation is even more severe than first thought, with temperatures and impacts increasing faster than predicted.

Faced with the evidence, many deniers have started to admit that global warming is real, but argue that humans have little or nothing to do with it. Muller’s study was just one of many to demolish that theory.

Our climate has always changed, and natural variation is part of that. But scientists have long known that carbon dioxide and other gases trap heat in the atmosphere. Recent warming is occurring at an unprecedented rate that corresponds to burning fossil fuels. According to NASA, global average temperatures have been rising significantly since the 1970s, “with the 20 warmest years having occurred since 1981 and with all 10 of the warmest years occurring in the past 12 years.” North America just experienced the hottest July on record, and the first seven months of 2012 were the warmest, on average, in more than 100 years.

This evidence has caused some deniers to change their tune again. Yes, the Earth is warming, they say, but whether it’s from natural or human causes, we can’t do anything about it, so we might as well continue with business as usual, maybe employing technological fixes to help us adapt.

There’s also a subset of deniers who see some nefarious conspiracy in climate science and “Agenda 21” (a nonbinding, voluntary UN agreement on sustainable development) to impose a world government or something, but their irrational arguments aren’t worth the time of day.

The truth is, as most of us know, that global warming is real and humans are major contributors, mainly because we wastefully burn fossil fuels. We also know solutions lie in energy conservation, shifting to renewable sources, and changing our patterns of energy and fuel use, for example, by improving public transit and moving away from personal vehicles.

Scientists have been warning about global warming for decades. It’s too late to stop it now, but we can lessen its severity and impacts. The side benefits are numerous: less pollution and environmental destruction, better human health, stronger and more diversified economies, and a likely reduction in global conflicts fuelled by the rapacious drive to exploit finite resources.

We can all work to reduce our individual impacts. But we must also convince our political and business leaders that it’s time to put people—especially our children, grandchildren, and generations yet to come—before profits.

David Suzuki: Climate change deniers are almost extinct | Vancouver, Canada | Straight.com
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,395
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
Scientists have been warning about global warming for decades. It’s too late to stop it now, but we can lessen its severity and impacts. The side benefits are numerous: less pollution and environmental destruction, better human health, stronger and more diversified economies, and a likely reduction in global conflicts fuelled by the rapacious drive to exploit finite resources.
Are these the same scientists who warned us about bad human genetics running amok, rallied Govts through lobbying, encourage and them eventually went on to enforce the laws they desired in a GLOBAL EFFORT?

Maybe we should ask a geneticist like Dr. David Suzuki?

It would be really damn easy to clean the genes so to speak through a threat to humanity such as global warming.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Of course his jetting around the world doesn't leave any carbon footprint because it is for our own good. Or getting to his fancy summer home on Quadra Island accessable by carbon spewing ferries plus car, private helicopter or boat.
 

Cabbagesandking

Council Member
Apr 24, 2012
1,041
0
36
Ontario
Are these the same scientists who warned us about bad human genetics running amok, rallied Govts through lobbying, encourage and them eventually went on to enforce the laws they desired in a GLOBAL EFFORT?

Maybe we should ask a geneticist like Dr. David Suzuki?

It would be really damn easy to clean the genes so to speak through a threat to humanity such as global warming.

No! They are not. Your pets are not involved though, to judge by some of the 'crap' here, they may have had some merit!
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Of course his jetting around the world doesn't leave any carbon footprint because it is for our own good. Or getting to his fancy summer home on Quadra Island accessable by carbon spewing ferries plus car, private helicopter or boat.

David Suzuki is a scientist respected all over the world. He doesn't have a particularly large carbon footprint and btw, he doesn't have a private helicopter.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
Written with contributions from David Suzuki Foundation Editorial and Communications Specialist Ian Hanington.


Ok then. Sounds like a Fareed Zakaria koolaid cocktail with a dash of Joseph Goebbels. :lol:
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,395
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
No! They are not. Your pets are not involved though, to judge by some of the 'crap' here, they may have had some merit!
Is he a geneticist who ended up teaching a sociology class at UBC or is the guy a climate scientiist?


The Eugenics movemet could really use a geneticist/sociologist on their side couldn't they? Who could be more handier?
 

MapleDog

Time Out
Jun 1, 2012
1,791
0
36
St Calixte Quebec Canada
Is he a geneticist who ended up teaching a sociology class at UBC or is the guy a climate scientiist?


The Eugenics movemet could really use a geneticist/sociologist on their side couldn't they? Who could be more handier?
Well we also get Al "Bore" Gore who was a vice prez,then by some weird magic "POOF" he's an expert in ecology and global warming.

PS do not forget the other expert paid by...........
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
He was probably thinking about the other AGW proponent, and internet inventor, Al Gore.

Even though Suzuki is preachy and sensationalist, this piece doesn't have anything remarkably outlandish about it. I might have to agree with Loc (for once in an eternity) that the "communications specialist" probably smoothed it over. :lol:
 

coldstream

on dbl secret probation
Oct 19, 2005
5,160
27
48
Chillliwack, BC
As i see it, the AGW deniers... are in fact more focussed, and convinced and convincing that they ever have been.

This is part of the latest ploy of AGW proponents to deem the debate ENDED.. only a few lunatics deniers left. When in fact their arguments have fallen apart.. the deception obvious to anyone with a shred of reasonable objectivity. Underneath AGW fanatics are boiling with frustration that they haven't created the mass panic, except in the popular press.. that they intended.

Honestly.. for a guy with a Phd... Suzuki always looks so damn stupid... sputtering nonsense. Doesn't say much for the state of higher education and the credentials they proffer these days.
 
Last edited:

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
70
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
And yet one more new climate change thread from the god of redundant topic threads.
"Ah, whatta maroon" - B Bunny

Who gives a frack about what Snuzuki thinks? And what has this to do with Canadian politics?

Honestly.. for a guy who claims to be a scientist... I usually look so damn stupid... sputtering nonsense. Doesn't say much for the state of higher education and the credentials they proffer these days.
Fixed it for ya.
 

Cabbagesandking

Council Member
Apr 24, 2012
1,041
0
36
Ontario
As i see the AGW deniers... are in fact more focussed, and convinced and convincing that they ever have been.

This is part of the latest ploy of AGW proponents to deem the debate ENDED.. only a few lunatics deniers left. When in fact their arguments have fallen apart.. the deception obvious to anyone with a shred of reasonable objectivity. Underneath AGW fanatics are boiling with frustration that they haven't created the mass panic, except in the popular press.. that they intended.

Honestly.. for a guy with a Phd... Suzuki always looks so damn stupid... sputtering nonsense. Doesn't say much for the state of higher education and the credentials they proffer these days.

There is no debate. There has been no debate for twenty years since ther has been nothing to debate. Scepticism ended then. All that remained was time and shape. And, as I wrote, scientists have been too careful not to arouse panic. Politicians should have done that since they are armed with all the information.

But, the moment you deniers try to denigrate Suzuli and Gore, you are lost. It is the limit of your argument and your (lack of) knowledge.
 

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
45
48
65
Even though Suzuki is preachy and sensationalist, this piece doesn't have anything remarkably outlandish about it. I might have to agree with Loc (for once in an eternity) that the "communications specialist" probably smoothed it over. :lol:


Seems like a choir preaching memo to me too. A rah rah go get 'em schpeel.
 

skookumchuck

Council Member
Jan 19, 2012
2,467
0
36
Van Isle
Is he a geneticist who ended up teaching a sociology class at UBC or is the guy a climate scientiist?


The Eugenics movemet could really use a geneticist/sociologist on their side couldn't they? Who could be more handier?

Apparently his first notable discipline has been buried, i seem to remember him originally being enamored of fruit flys. Given the crowd he hangs with it appears he still is.
They are embarrassed now so they call those of us who question AGW but do not deny change, deniers, whats up with that? Honesty is a tough row to hoe.