Religious freedom office defended by Baird

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Religious freedom office defended by Baird




Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird says his department's new Office of Religious Freedom won't become a vehicle for playing domestic politics in Canada's immigrant communities.

Baird dismissed criticism that the new office could lead to an uncomfortable mix of religion and politics.

"Freedom of religion is one of the first things in the Charter, it's one of the first things in the Bill of Rights, it's front and centre in the UN Declaration of Human Rights – it's an essential human right; I don't see any concern about that at all," Baird told The Canadian Press in a year-end interview.

The Tories announced the creation of the office in their federal election platform last spring, but they have yet to roll out details of the new entity, to be housed within Foreign Affairs. The government is expected to formally announce the new office early this year.

Baird has high hopes for the Office of Religious Freedom, even though it will come with a modest $5-million price tag. That will include a relatively minuscule $500,000 budget for operations, so it won't be a major drag on already thin resources.

But some are warning the office could have a broad impact, and not the positive one the Conservative government is looking for.


Tories accused of secrecy over new office

Alex Neve, the head of Amnesty International Canada, says that while religious persecution "is a serious human rights concern right around the world" he's not confident about the government's approach to the new office.

"We're watching it with interest but also with considerable concern," said Neve. "There is such complete secrecy about it." His organization has met with Foreign Affairs officials, but questions about the office generate vague responses along the lines of "work is under way" and "you'll be hearing more," said Neve.

Neve said religious freedom can have a "contentious relationship" with other crucial human-rights concerns such as women's equality, the equality rights of gays and lesbians, and freedom of expression.

"It's an area obviously where governments need to tread carefully. They need to do so in ways where they don't – either intentionally or unintentionally – convey a message that some religions are preferred over others."

Baird has been consulting internationally, including meetings with the Vatican in Rome and a day of consultations in Ottawa with religious groups in October.

The October consultations were not open to the public. Neve questions why Amnesty and other rights groups were excluded.

Baird offered few details about how the new office will actually function during a pre-Christmas interview.


Details still to come

"It's in the campaign document. What you see is what you get. There won't be any surprises," the minister said, adding he would be "speaking to it in the new year."

Pressed on what exactly the office will do, Baird replied: "It will be promoting religious freedom." He said it would involve "persuasion, lobbying, putting light ... promoting."

The Tories have noted that the concept of the office is not novel to Canada. They point to the fact the U.S. State Department has its own religious freedom office that was created in the late 1990s under the Democratic administration of Bill Clinton.

A May briefing note to Baird, obtained under Access to Information, lays out three priority areas for the new office: protecting, and advocating on behalf of, religious minorities under threat; opposing religious hatred and intolerance; promoting the Canadian values of pluralism and tolerance abroad.

Baird has consulted internationally on the creation of the new office meeting with the Holy See in Rome, the Aga Khan, head of the Greek Orthodox Church in Turkey and the U.S. ambassador at large for international religious freedom.

"They accomplished a lot," Baird said of his meeting last summer with Suzan Johnson Cook, the U.S. Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom.

But he added "ours will be a made-in-Canada approach."

Baird cited persecution of Baha'i practitioners in Iran, Coptic Christians killed in Egypt and Roman Catholic priests who have been forced underground in China. "Sometimes tough things need to be said. It's really uncomfortable, I think, for the Egyptian government when you talk about the plight of Copts," said Baird.

"If you're one of the 54 Copts who was killed at this time last year, it's pretty uncomfortable for you and your family too, whose only sin was being Coptic."

As the Tories mull their final roll out for the new office, religious violence is sparking the usual time-honoured response of Canadian governments, whether Liberal or Conservative: a written denunciation in the minister's name condemning the perpetrators and an expression of solidarity for the victims.

That's what happened on Christmas Day after a radical sect called Boko Haram claimed responsibility for a series of attacks on churches that killed at least 42 people in Nigeria. Baird's statement that day said: "Our thoughts and prayers are with the victims and their loved ones. These people died practising their religion – a basic human right. Canada strongly denounces such cowardly attacks without reservation."

Religious freedom office defended by Baird - Politics - CBC News
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Not a major drag but a drag nonetheless. Tax and spend Conservatives.

And they have been quite public in condemning countries that want to execute Gays. Is that another Cons foreign policy that you disagree with? No I would assume is the answer.

Minority Religions have been targeted for killings and human rights violations. Look to Iran for one.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
And they have been quite public in condemning countries that want to execute Gays. Is that another Cons foreign policy that you disagree with? No I would assume is the answer.

Minority Religions have been targeted for killings and human rights violations. Look to Iran for one.

I can understand if Baird wants to use the office to preach religious tolerance as foreign policy.

Internally though, it might be considered a bit of a waste to implement this policy since we're already one of the most religiously tolerant nations on the planet.


(The lighter the colour, the more religious freedom exists in that state.)
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Foreign Affairs Minister John Baird says his department's new Office of Religious Freedom won't become a vehicle for playing domestic politics in Canada's immigrant communities.

Baird dismissed criticism that the new office could lead to an uncomfortable mix of religion and politics.


And if you believe that I have some ocean front property in Alberta for sale cheap.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Oh I'm sure the Office of Religious Freedoms will be banned from commenting on the Canadian Constitution.

Correct - Reason it is in Foreign Affairs. If it was to monitor the Canadian Religious Right, it would have been tucked away in the Ministry of "Hidden Agenda"s". Thank God it was not.

Clinton the hero for some opened the first US Office under his watch. So if Clinton did it, why would Liberals complain?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
Free religion seems a bad idea not because religion itself is bad but because the popular choices of religion have no true practice in the modern world. That science was the first to be co opted by the evil of money. So the new office will in fact be used to promote the mindless drivel now substituting for the real thing, which does indeed exist.
 

Goober

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 23, 2009
24,691
116
63
Moving
Free religion seems a bad idea not because religion itself is bad but because the popular choices of religion have no true practice in the modern world. That science was the first to be co opted by the evil of money. So the new office will in fact be used to promote the mindless drivel now substituting for the real thing, which does indeed exist.

There are approx 10,000 religions. I take it that you have studied all of these religiously?
 

darkbeaver

the universe is electric
Jan 26, 2006
41,035
201
63
RR1 Distopia 666 Discordia
There are approx 10,000 religions. I take it that you have studied all of these religiously?

You do not appreciate the meaning of the word religion. There are as many true religions as there are self conscious minds.


THE ROOT OF ALLYet it seems to even a superficial view that nothing could be more absurd and more ominous than the radical presupposition that religion can be destroyed by a fiat of government. Had there been a clear understanding of what religion basically is, such an overweening presumption could never have taken form to betray otherwise well-meaning zealots. Trimmed of all abstruse verbiage the fundamental definition of religion is just man's psychological reaction to the universe of life, in which he finds himself. By psychological is meant intellectual and emotional, sensual and spiritual, the experiences of the psyche or conscious faculty in man. The whole reaction of man, the psychic being, to life is his religion. Intellectually, what a man thinks of life is his philosophy; but when the philosophic content of his thought works over into his emotional realm and becomes suffused with the emotions of loyalty, sacrifice, devotion and high allegiance, it is then his religion. Etymologically it is that influence which "bi nds" him "back" (Latin, re, back, and ligo, to bind.) to that which is most deeply fundamental in him, his deific self; a power or disposition which, amidst the events of a world that is ever changing, links him to an order of permanent and essential being that is the abiding heart of the universe. It is well that this etymological sense of the word be clarified, for there have been definitions that have widely missed the mark of true meaning. One current rendering has it, a "binding back" to the purely conservative, a tying to traditionalism.


/So The Office of Religious Freedom will in fact protect the institutions of religion, the very organizations that have ensured and continue to ensure that you or I and as many as possible get no actual religion except what comes out of a prepared can of approved divine spaghetti../
 
Last edited:

Spade

Ace Poster
Nov 18, 2008
12,822
49
48
9
Aether Island
Perhaps Baird should set up a Freedom-To-Do-Dishes-Wearing-A-Cassock Office in Foreign Affairs. There are so many freedoms without their own office.