Mulcair staking leadership on sustainable development

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Thomas Mulcair stakes his leadership bid on a pledge of sustainable development

OTTAWA — Thomas Mulcair is offering a vision for Canada based on a single concept — sustainable development.

It’s the lens through which the so-called front-runner in the race for the New Democratic Party’s leadership views all decisions, even those that may not be entirely popular among his party’s base.

For example, while others may want to shutdown the oilsands, Mulcair’s proposing a different approach to development, namely an end to the $1.4 billion in annual subsides the oil and gas sector receives from the government which would help “internalize the cost” and create a more “balanced economy.”

He ultimately wants to stave off the “Dutch Disease,” a term coined in the 1970s to describe the decline of the manufacturing sector in the Netherlands after the discovery of large natural gas deposits drove up the Dutch currency and the costs associated with exporting manufactured goods.

“In a resource rich country like Canada we’ll always have a strong primary sector comprised mainly of mining and forestry and the like and we’ll also have an increasing and burgeoning service sector,” he said.

“But one of the parts of that balanced economy was a manufacturing sector and we’ve lost hundreds of thousands of good paying manufacturing jobs since the Conservatives came into power six years ago.”

Just as consumers pay a premium on tires to ensure they are safely disposed of at the end of their lifecycle, the same “polluter pay, user pay” principles should also apply to the oilsands, he added.

To that end, Mulcair has vowed to introduce a cap-and-trade system to put a price on carbon emissions.

“In every approach to a problem, you have to look at the economic, the social and the environmental aspects to come to your decision,” he said, noting he’s earned a reputation for “applying legislation in the public interest” and being a “tough enforcer.

“Instead, we’re leaving it to future generations the cost to clean up the soil, the air and the water that’s being devastated by the way in which we’re exploiting it right now.”

Mulcair argues his plan would also leave funds for “green renewables” like the Lower Churchill hydroelectric project in Newfoundland and Labrador. Widely unpopular in his home province of Quebec which is upset that the competing interest received a federal loan guarantee, Mulcair suggested it’s another example of how he’s prepare to go against the grain on principle.

The Lower Churchill project, he said, is one he supports as it will go a long way towards “displacing coal burning plants in Atlantic Canada.”

Feared by some as the leadership candidate who might move the party closer to the centre of the political spectrum, the former Quebec environment minister, who made the jump from the Liberals to the NDP in 2007, rejects the notion, saying he’s actually trying to move the centre closer to the NDP.

He admits the First Nations file is one public policy issue he hasn’t had a lot of experience with, but he believes it’s an important priority for New Democrats and he’s committed to learning more about it.

He’s also vowed to make gender equality a priority and is committed to introducing a “transparent” and “credible” appointment policy for judicial and other “top jobs” in Canada.

From the attention he devotes to the most minute of details from his tie to the backdrop he’ll use on camera, the man sometimes derided as arrogant is running what is arguably the most professional and polished of all the campaigns.

Mulcair believes his experience as both a senior public administrator with the Quebec professions board and as a cabinet minister in the National Assembly make him the only candidate who has what it takes to defeat Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

The Quebecer is also not worried about rebranding himself a pan-Canadian candidate which he’ll have to do if he’s going to attract the support needed to be elected leader.

Mulcair said he’s generating large crowds at churches and pubs right across the country and is, at the very least, relishing the opportunity to connect with so many people.


Thomas Mulcair stakes his leadership bid on a pledge of sustainable development | News | National Post
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
The Liberals are a mess and none of the NDP leadership hopefuls are Jack Layton.

This was the common line just after his death, but even with a "sovereigntist" interim leader, the NDP are holding their own in the polls. The Liberals have shot up a lot and Conservatives have gone down.

With the number of gaffes the Conservatives keep feeding to the media these days, they're going to have their hands full.

By the way, sustainable development is a good platform to stand on.

Jeffrey Sachs, a leading economist, is getting tons of praise from all over the globe for his work on this. You should check out this speech he made. It's an eye-opener.

 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,612
2,359
113
Toronto, ON
This was the common line just after his death, but even with a "sovereigntist" interim leader, the NDP are holding their own in the polls. The Liberals have shot up a lot and Conservatives have gone down.

With the number of gaffes the Conservatives keep feeding to the media these days, they're going to have their hands full.

I think a lot of NDP current supporters are giving the NDP the benifit of the doubt until they name their new leader officially. Once the new leader has a month or two, barring a miracle or a competant centralist leader, their numbers will slide.

The Liberals always present nice safe polling options between elections. They always fall off during elections when their platform or lack there of is examined.

Yes. The Conservatives have not exactly been mistake free. But they haven't been any worse than previous terms and they seem to be withstanding it. Come 2014 will look at polls more closely.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,346
557
113
59
Alberta
Even if Jack Layton were alive, in remission, and leading the NDP there would be no difference. The NDP is not prepared to lead this Country, the Liberals are in the doldrums and Canadians have always gone with the devil they know.

Wishing it weren't so will not change that fact.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Things have turned around for underdog Thomas Mulcair
Mulcair has finally hit his stride, halfway through the NDP leadership race

He went into the campaign for the New Democratic Party leadership saying that the party's lack of a Quebec base created a structural disadvantage for him.

Today, halfway through the race and the first candidate to have visited every province meeting hundreds of NDP delegates, Outremont MP Thomas Mulcair says things have turned around for the better. "We've been on an ascending curve," Mulcair said in a year-end interview with The Gazette. "Our campaign is picking up momentum week by week, day by day and it's going in the right direction."

Mulcair was just back from attending a meeting of the British Columbia NDP wing along with other leadership candidates. He proudly notes 200 people rotated through his campaign hospitality suite during the weekend.

Many signed up as supporters, other endorsements have been emerging and Mulcair is more pumped about the campaign than in the days last September when he was mulling over a run at the job to replace the late Jack Layton.

At the time, he said he wasn't keen to enter a race with one hand tied behind his back, a reference to the fact the NDP in September only had 1,700 members in Quebec out of a Canadian total of 83,824.

"We are disadvantaged," he said then. "It's not a complaint; it's a simple observation."

Today, with the NDP closing in on 7,000 members in Quebec, Mulcair's campaign seems to have hit its stride. It's not known what level of support each candidate has here, but Mulcair's objective is to boost NDP membership in Quebec to 20,000 to improve his chances.

Taking a step back to look at Mulcair's past, as a person and a politician, two things stand out.

First, it's clear part of him thrives in the underdog role. Second, his feisty style - well known to Quebecers - is something new to the rest of the country, which is accustomed to a more sedate NDP. Nowhere was the underdog side clearer than in the 2007 by-election in the federal riding of Outremont, a Liberal stronghold that nobody expected the party to win.

Mulcair pulled off an upset win, establishing a beachhead that later would help the party achieve the May 2, 2011, orange wave, which propelled 59 Quebec NDP MPs into office. He was doubted again in the run-up to the leadership campaign; this time about his very capacity to do the job.

Pundits honed in on his temperament, wondering how the "firebrand," Mulcair (as they wrote) would fit into a job.

The reputation dates back to when he was a provincial Liberal politician in the National Assembly, a time where his opponents in the Parti Québécois nicknamed the tall, bearded, sharp-witted anglophone Mulcair "the grizzly." He was known for having a short fuse and a killer instinct, honed when he was part of the 1994 Liberal opposition "rat pack," which tangled daily with the PQ government.

Mulcair today notes many of these descriptions of his character come from unnamed sources. "These things go in waves," Mulcair said in the interview. "My campaign has been totally high road."

"I'm a very determined guy. People know that about me. I think people like a little bit of spirit and drive in politics and I've certainly got both of those in spades." But in the first debate among the nine candidates seeking the leadership on Dec. 4, some were surprised to find a calm and good-natured Mulcair on stage.

And if Mulcair has managed to steer attention away from the character issue, he has played up his ability to win the approval of real voters.

Mulcair regularly mentions the day in 2006 in which he quit the Charest cabinet, on principle, rather than accept a demotion because he refused to sign an order-in-council transferring lands in Orford provincial park to developers.

Mulcair said he has mellowed.

"I was 39 when I arrived in politics. I wanted to prove myself," Mulcair told L'Actualité in May. Now 56, Mulcair plays up his ability to work with a team, noting that when he launched his campaign he was joined on stage by 33 other MPs. Today he has 35.

NDP race: Things have turned around for underdog Thomas Mulcair in NDP leadership race

 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
By the way, sustainable development is a good platform to stand on.

That all depends on who is defining sustainable development. There is no concise meaning to the term.
For an easy example: The forest industry cuts X amount of wood each year on Y amount of crown land which matches total growth, thus making it sustainable as long as nothing outside their control changes. Now along come a bunch of newbies with no connection to the forest industry that want a bunch of large parks. By caving in to this potential voter block the government has just taken Z amount of land from Y making what was once sustainable industry unsustainable without a reduction in cut and the connected job and tax losses. Also by definition mining and petroleum are not sustainable industries because there is no more ore bodies being grown.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
That all depends on who is defining sustainable development. There is no concise meaning to the term.
For an easy example: The forest industry cuts X amount of wood each year on Y amount of crown land which matches total growth, thus making it sustainable as long as nothing outside their control changes. Now along come a bunch of newbies with no connection to the forest industry that want a bunch of large parks. By caving in to this potential voter block the government has just taken Z amount of land from Y making what was once sustainable industry unsustainable without a reduction in cut and the connected job and tax losses. Also by definition mining and petroleum are not sustainable industries because there is no more ore bodies being grown.

If any industry fails to be sustainable, then sustainable development hasn't occurred. One of the tenets of sustainable development is to take into consideration a long-term consequence for our current actions.

Sustainable development (SD) is a pattern of growth in which resource use aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present, but also for generations to come (sometimes taught as ELF-Environment, Local people, Future).


Sustainable development - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 

jariax

Electoral Member
Jun 13, 2006
141
0
16
Yes. Read the opening post in this thread.

So, you feel that it's a mistake to remove subsidies from the oil companies that are:

1) Making massive profits.
2) Depleting a limited natural resource
3) Not paying for the pollution that they create
4) Developing at a rate unsustainable for the people of Fort McMurray

Or perhaps it's only the idea of paying to pollute that you don't approve of.
Perhaps we should get rid of all penalties for pollution and try to attract corporations here, under that basis.

Canada can have the competitive advantage of allowing companies to pollute as much as they like with no consequences whatsoever.
Perhaps we can soon rival the former East Germany in beauty.
 

L Gilbert

Winterized
Nov 30, 2006
23,738
107
63
70
50 acres in Kootenays BC
the-brights.net
If any industry fails to be sustainable, then sustainable development hasn't occurred. One of the tenets of sustainable development is to take into consideration a long-term consequence for our current actions.

Sustainable development (SD) is a pattern of growth in which resource use aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present, but also for generations to come (sometimes taught as ELF-Environment, Local people, Future).


Sustainable development - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Unfortunately, this growth, or development, has never been able to keep up with both an increasing population, being environmentally sensitive, and sociologically sensitive all at the same time.
Sustainable development is an idealistic fantasy; I doubt it will ever happen. We're going to sustainably develop a mass kill-off of our species. Which won't be such a bad thing, IMO.
 
Last edited:

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
If any industry fails to be sustainable, then sustainable development hasn't occurred. One of the tenets of sustainable development is to take into consideration a long-term consequence for our current actions.

Sustainable development (SD) is a pattern of growth in which resource use aims to meet human needs while preserving the environment so that these needs can be met not only in the present, but also for generations to come (sometimes taught as ELF-Environment, Local people, Future).


Sustainable development - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well in that case we should pump all the oil we can right now since obviously isn't sustainable anyway. No point in letting it go to waste especially since our governments need the money now to pay for your social programs.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Well in that case we should pump all the oil we can right now since obviously isn't sustainable anyway.

Oil isn't sustainable?

Of course it is. But in order to ensure we sustain it's use for the longest period of time, we require significant investments into alternate technologies so that we have multiple sources of energy to work with.

Unfortunately, this growth, or development, has never been able to keep up with both an increasing population, being environmentally sensitive, and sociologically sensitive all at the same time.

It all depends on how well we develop our tech. With these issues, it's better to have some form of long-term strategy, than no strategy at all.