Time to unite NDP, Liberals: Martin

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Time to unite NDP, Liberals: Martin
And if no one else wants to do it, longtime MP will throw hat in ring

OTTAWA -- Manitoba NDP MP Pat Martin says he is prepared to throw his hat into the NDP leadership ring if no other candidates step forward on a platform to unite the party with the Liberals.

Martin, one of the four longest-serving MPs in the NDP caucus, said the only candidate who will get his support is one who will bring the two parties together. "I firmly believe we have the ability to stop the Harper agenda," said Martin. "I'm serving notice that that's what I want to hear from a leaders candidate. And I'm not alone."

He said if no such candidate steps forward, "I will do it myself."

Martin admitted he has a history of some knock-out fights with the Liberals but also pointed out this is not the first time he has suggested the two parties co-operate. In 2007 he was nearly punted from his caucus after he said the NDP and Liberals should form an alliance. However in 2007 he did not favour an actual merger.

Now he does.

"It's time to bury the hatchet," he said. "Both our parties have serious flaws but we have way more in common than we have differences." Talk of a possible merger with the Liberals was hot in Ottawa as the Liberals met for an end-of-summer caucus retreat and the NDP begin pursuing a leadership campaign after the death last week of Jack Layton.

Both former Liberal prime minister Jean Chrétien, and recent Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff were both heard musing recently about the possibilities of a united party. Liberal MP Denis Coderre said this week he, too, thinks the discussion should take place.

However, Interim Liberal Leader Bob Rae said it's not on his agenda, and the NDP officials dismissed the idea, saying their focus is on being the official Opposition and their leadership race.

Quebec MP Thomas Mulcair, believed to be among the most likely contenders, spoke about it for the first time since Layton's death Tuesday, saying he is gauging support for a leadership bid.

The 56-year-old, who is fluently bilingual, indicated he would likely wait until after the House of Commons resumes sitting on Sept. 19 to say what he will do. He also wants to see the rules of the leadership contest, which will be announced Sept. 9.

Mulcair had kept a relatively low profile since Layton's death last week. He spoke openly on Tuesday about beginning a consultation process that would include putting a communication and fundraising team in place. "I am receiving lots of support, lots of interest, and not only in Quebec where support is extremely strong," he said before giving a speech to law students at McGill University. "But it is going to be a pan-Canadian campaign and the support has to be there as well."

Mulcair refused to categorically reject a merger on Tuesday, but appeared to suggest the NDP should seek out supporters among Liberal ranks. "Our sole goal is to form a government, and the way to do so is to have ideas that connect with the most Canadians possible," he said, pointing out the Liberals had previously turned down an NDP merger offer.

"Wherever these progressive forces come from, we will ensure we have enough Canadians to form the next government."

NDP president Brian Topp also says he is thinking about it and there are some serious backroom machinations underway to promote his cause. Numerous anonymous comments to reporters pushed Topp as the best candidate even before Layton's funeral. Ottawa MP Paul Dewar has said his name should be left on the list of possible contenders. And three other MPs -- British Columbia's Peter Julian, and Nova Scotia's Robert Chisholm and Megan Leslie -- said they're considering whether to enter the race.

Pat Martin said he thinks the NDP could win the next election on its own but if the NDP and Liberals ran together, it would be a certainty and a majority.

The two parties together had just under 50 per cent of the popular vote in the May 2 election. However, it is highly unlikely a united party would poll quite that high, as some voters would be turned off. In 2000, before the Canadian Alliance and Progressive Conservative parties merged, they garnered 37.7 per cent of the vote together. In 2004, the first time they ran as a united party, they earned 29.6 per cent support.

Martin acknowledged if the NDP and Liberals united, the more right-leaning Liberals would likely abandon the ship. But he believes most of the right-leaning Liberals have already done so. "The benefits outweigh the costs and everybody knows that," Martin said. "If we believe all the things we say about Harper ruining this country, we have it in our grasp to do something about it."


Time to unite NDP, Liberals: Martin - Winnipeg Free Press


Yea, I also thought this was about Paul Martin .. *bites knuckles*
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
192
63
Nakusp, BC
Unfortunately, I think it is too late to stop the damage being done to our sovereignty. It is looking like the NAU is done deal and it will fail just as the EU is doing.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,369
578
113
59
Alberta
Funny, I thought it was Paul Martin as well. If it was, it would certainly illustrate how desperate the Liberals are to get their boney fingers back on the power stick.

The fact that it's another NDPer shows a lack of confidence that they will maintain official opposition status. Believe it or not, I actually hope they do. The Liberal Party should stay in the doldrums for the foreseeable future as it is obvious that they have learned nothing.
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,466
138
63
Location, Location
I don't think it's time to merge the NDP and the Liberals. I think it's time for the parties to explain what they stand for. The Liberals seem to have given up standing for anything, and oddly enough, they've lost big time.

If they can ever figure out what they stand for, (ie, not just being 'not Harper'), and explain that to the public, they'll get support.

Merging with the NDP is simply an admission that they don't actually stand for anything, and have given up.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Funny, I thought it was Paul Martin as well. If it was, it would certainly illustrate how desperate the Liberals are to get their boney fingers back on the power stick.

The fact that it's another NDPer shows a lack of confidence that they will maintain official opposition status. Believe it or not, I actually hope they do. The Liberal Party should stay in the doldrums for the foreseeable future as it is obvious that they have learned nothing.

The Liberals have an opportunity to rebuild their caucus. I would rather them do so than this merger nonsense that takes away voting options for all of us. But they need to have a clear vision for the next 10 or so years.

And that's the beauty of the Liberal caucus to begin with. They're flexible enough to move from center-left to center-right, and that's a great alternative for fringe conservatives and socialists. I really like that we have this three party system.

Believe it or not, this is a great time to be involved in politics because most views are becoming represented.

I don't think it's time to merge the NDP and the Liberals. I think it's time for the parties to explain what they stand for. The Liberals seem to have given up standing for anything, and oddly enough, they've lost big time.

If they can ever figure out what they stand for, (ie, not just being 'not Harper'), and explain that to the public, they'll get support.

Merging with the NDP is simply an admission that they don't actually stand for anything, and have given up.


Yup. It's time for them to roll the dice and go left or right.

This Pat Martin guy is trying to nab some spotlight, but it's a bit alarmist to be calling for mergers. The Liberals have enough time to rebuild this caucus and make it relevant again.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Are you suggesting I run? :)

Why would you have to?

You have a moderately conservative government in power that is working toward their established base. Unless you veer extremely right both economically and socially (please see most Republicans or Durry), you don't need start a campaign trail.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,369
578
113
59
Alberta
Why would you have to?

You have a moderately conservative government in power that is working toward their established base. Unless you veer extremely right both economically and socially (please see most Republicans or Durry), you don't need start a campaign trail.

I need a secure pension that increases based on inflation.:smile:
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
I need a secure pension that increases based on inflation.:smile:

I'm not too clear on the conservatives and retirement plans - but I was under the impression they're doing a decent job for the economy. As long as Alberta keeps pumping juice, you may get your wish.
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
I'm not a Liberal or NDP supporter. I wouldn't vote for a merged-left party in all likelihood but I don't like this for reasons that have nothing to do with my political beliefs or those of the parties in question.

I think the biggest reason we should be wary of merger talk between the NDP and Libs is that it takes us that much closer to a 2 party system. Living down here in the US for the past 2 years, I do see it as a major drawback. There is nothing preventing independent candidates or even the formation of additional parties BUT the reality is both of those options aren't viable because of the machinery the big players can use to quash the up and comers. With more parties in play, yes we may have some vote splitting but the voters have a better chance to vote for a party that is closer to their actual viewpoint; we also have a chance to use an effective protest vote, instead of just voting for Incompetent_Choice_A vs. Incompetent_Choice_B.

We can also look to both sides of the spectrum and see grass-roots movements that were able to build themselves into real political forces: the NDP starting in the 40s-50s, more recently groups like the Bloc, Reform and Greens. The closest the US has come has been Ross Perot, who while entertaining never really had much political impact, Ralph Nader who was a left version of Perot and now the Tea Party which has lost its sense of direction and joined the Republicans who are the guiltiest of the policies they claim to stand against, rather than being an independent political force and holding everyone more accountable.

Politics, at its core, is the art of compromise but there's only so far one can go before you are forced to compromise so much that your beliefs are meaningless, and I feel that is what happens with the smaller number of parties.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,395
11,449
113
Low Earth Orbit
Bring Nystrom back into the party for a leadership contender. His track record as an MP that works for the people is impeccable.
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
A divided left makes it damn near impossible for either the Liberals or NDP to achieve government. Same with the various right wing parties in the 90s.
 

wulfie68

Council Member
Mar 29, 2009
2,014
24
38
Calgary, AB
A divided left makes it damn near impossible for either the Liberals or NDP to achieve government. Same with the various right wing parties in the 90s.

I disagree and so does history. There were 3 parties when Pearson took power, and Trudeau. You can go back farther and see the same thing. Chretien was the only Liberal to be able to take advantage of the PC vs Reform situation.

The problem the Liberals have is much like other posters have stated: they have lost their identity. They used to be a centrist party with left leanings, as the Conservative were (and really still are) centrist with right leanings. The Liberals though have edged steadily left, encroaching on the same base as the NDP, to the point where organized labour leaders, such as Buzz Hargrove were aligning with them instead of the NDP. By abandoning the center to the Conservatives, the Liberals have marginalized themselves which in combination with the regional fractures that dominate Canadian politics, has let there opponents gain at their expense.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
A divided left makes it damn near impossible for either the Liberals or NDP to achieve government. Same with the various right wing parties in the 90s.

It partly depends on how many voters jump from one party to the other. And then that will be influenced by how well the Liberals can claw their way back in. If they can't, you will see Liberals with seat levels that are comparable to the former NDP caucus.

It will be tough, but the Liberals will have to scramble for something that distinguishes them from the NDP - something that shows a clear advantage to the Canadian public if we give them their vote. And unlike the conservatives, they can't easily cull their fanbase with the mantra - "Vote for the NDP? Are you crazy?" lol

Let's also not forget that all parties want to fleece the blue ocean segment of the vote:

The youth vote.

You can bet the farm that since the youth mostly tend to be left-leaning, the NDP will spend quite a bit on advertising to lure in this group in the hopes that they usurp the other parties.
 
Last edited:

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
I don't think it's time to merge the NDP and the Liberals. I think it's time for the parties to explain what they stand for. The Liberals seem to have given up standing for anything, and oddly enough, they've lost big time.{/QUOTE]

Absolutely! They've been relatively quiet lately, let's hope they are hard at work on something. I want real options come next election because that's the only thing that keeps them all in line.

I need a secure pension that increases based on inflation.:smile:

Who doesn't?
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Time to unite NDP, Liberals: Martin
And if no one else wants to do it, longtime MP will throw hat in ring

OTTAWA -- Manitoba NDP MP Pat Martin says he is prepared to throw his hat into the NDP leadership ring if no other candidates step forward on a platform to unite the party with the Liberals.

Martin, one of the four longest-serving MPs in the NDP caucus, said the only candidate who will get his support is one who will bring the two parties together. "I firmly believe we have the ability to stop the Harper agenda," said Martin. "I'm serving notice that that's what I want to hear from a leaders candidate. And I'm not alone."

He said if no such candidate steps forward, "I will do it myself."

Martin admitted he has a history of some knock-out fights with the Liberals but also pointed out this is not the first time he has suggested the two parties co-operate. In 2007 he was nearly punted from his caucus after he said the NDP and Liberals should form an alliance. However in 2007 he did not favour an actual merger.

Now he does.


That COULD be a disaster- historically the Liberal's platform was much closer to that of the Conservatives than to the N.D.P. Of course nowadays (why I don't get too wound up about politics) each party's platform is whatever they think will ensure longevity. It's a bloody wonder with all the "crossing the floor" there hasn't been a collision. If they did join forces I predict voters who generally vote for either party might just puke and vote Conservative out of disgust. It's amazing there are people who take this sh*t seriously. :smile:
 

Colpy

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 5, 2005
21,887
847
113
69
Saint John, N.B.
NDP-Liberal merger the way to win, CAW says - Canada - CBC News

I believe an NDP-Liberal merger would mean Conservative majorities until Hell freezes over.

Many moderate Liberals who have voted the "brand" for generations would abandon the new lefty party for the Conservatives.

Many of the radical NDP would leave for splinter parties, or the Greens.

The simple fact is the Liberal Party, and most of their support, are closer to the Conservatives than to the NDP.

The simple fact is the NDP constantly has trouble with the loonie left.........keeping them under control in a "big tent" party.......they'll leave the tent if the Liberals come on board. Or they will stay, poisoning the chalice for the vast majority of Canadian voters.

I do NOT believe a merger will happen. But I could be wrong.

nothing but good news for the Conservatives.

I should add that I don't want to see an NDP-Liberal merger.......there are aspects in Conservative policy that I quite frankly find appaling......and I would prefer to have a voting alternative. The NDP......or any new party with the NDP as dominant.....simply ain't it.

The (gasp) hated Liberals could be......
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,369
578
113
59
Alberta
A divided left makes it damn near impossible for either the Liberals or NDP to achieve government. Same with the various right wing parties in the 90s.

Really? The Liberals have been divided since the NDP was founded and they have held majority status.

Why can't the NDP do the same?

Or do you think (as I do) this recent landslide over the Liberals is just a phenomena of disenchanted Bloc and Liberal supporters who may think quite differently in the next election.

I doubt that Mr. Layton after all his hard work would have wanted his party to choke.
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
Really? The Liberals have been divided since the NDP was founded and they have held majority status.

At the time few people actually took the NDP seriously. If the Bloc or other separatist parties don't make a comeback I think the Liberals and NDP will continue with around the same level of support they have now. It depends on who ends up getting the leadership of both parties. The Liberals are cutting it a little close with waiting til mid 2013 for a permanent leader.

Also, there will be 30 new seats in the house of commons by the next election if Harper gets his way. That may shake things up. I think we all know the new seats in Alberta will go conservative, as usual. BC and Ontario-who knows.
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
11,369
578
113
59
Alberta
At the time few people actually took the NDP seriously. If the Bloc or other separatist parties don't make a comeback I think the Liberals and NDP will continue with around the same level of support they have now. It depends on who ends up getting the leadership of both parties. The Liberals are cutting it a little close with waiting til mid 2013 for a permanent leader.

Also, there will be 30 new seats in the house of commons by the next election if Harper gets his way. That may shake things up. I think we all know the new seats in Alberta will go conservative, as usual. BC and Ontario-who knows.

I think that if the NDP truly wants to be considered a legitimate alternative to the Conservatives this is not the time to flinch and had Jack not succumbed to cancer, I think there is no way he would have moved toward a merger. I completely understand Liberals now talking merger, they were decimated in the last election and still have not come to terms with the realization that the Canadian people have punished them for their arrogance. As for those NDP members who are even entertaining a merger, I think it is showing lack of confidence and extremely poor judgment.

Those politicians should look back to the days of PC -- Reform -- Canadian Alliance and take into consideration how hard it was to re-unite the right. This will set the Left back a great deal, not only in the eyes of voters, but the squabbling between NDP and Liberal members as their ideologies clash.

The best course of action for the NDP is to find a strong new leader and build on the legacy of Jack Layton has left them.

Thats my humble opinion anyway.