It occurred to me about 20.5 minutes ago that when the dispensing fees for medication was going to cost $2 for those on assistance, there was a flurry of doomsday warnings. Now, it has become the norm and in my opinion is a small token fee to not only offset some cost but also to discourage over medicating for simple ailments. A manageable fee makes sense.
If the user fees were clearly outlined prior to the visit and was
manageable it may lessen visits for routine issues. It also may encourage better health since people with chronic minor health problems will soon learn how to maintain themselves better.
The issue of a manageable fee has to be addressed. For example, the cost for a dentist isn't covered, but poor dental health is a condition commonly suffered by those with lower incomes. They simply can't afford to go.
Personally, while I understand the need for a change in the financial situation as it relates to healthcare, I fear loosing such easy access to a service I do not use regularly but have comfort in knowing it's there. Really, as silly as it sounds, it's the principal of losing that safety cushion that makes me concerned. But, then again, that makes me the same as the ones with the Placards in front of Parliament screaming about the now accepted prescription dispensing fees. With or without user fees, our standard of care wont be compromised. Just the wait for it will.
