While driving hom the other night I heard a couple of sportstalk radio guys exchanging theories on why Canada's best hockey players are usually quality character people. I found the discussion interesting. It's true in that usually Canada's hockey best are modest, good with the media, don't get into much trouble, don't appear too stuck on themselves etc. Here were some of their theories:
1) Canadians are humble people
The thought being Canadians are less prone to be glory seekers.
2) Good parents produce hockey stars
Usually kids who make through years of 4am practices etc have dedicated parents who teach discipline.
3) Mentors (ex-Stars) are mimmicked from childhood
From his early days Gretzky wanted be like Howe (nice guy). Lemeiux like Beliveau, Gretzky, Sid like Gretzky etc. A lineage of those traits.
4) A coincidence or luck.
5) A bit of everything.
You don't find too many Terrell Owens or Bobby Bonds in Canadian hockey superstars. Number 5 seems like an easy choice. Aside from it do you think any of the other theories are predominant, or do you have another? Or is it all bs and they aren't any different from any other sports stars.
1) Canadians are humble people
The thought being Canadians are less prone to be glory seekers.
2) Good parents produce hockey stars
Usually kids who make through years of 4am practices etc have dedicated parents who teach discipline.
3) Mentors (ex-Stars) are mimmicked from childhood
From his early days Gretzky wanted be like Howe (nice guy). Lemeiux like Beliveau, Gretzky, Sid like Gretzky etc. A lineage of those traits.
4) A coincidence or luck.
5) A bit of everything.
You don't find too many Terrell Owens or Bobby Bonds in Canadian hockey superstars. Number 5 seems like an easy choice. Aside from it do you think any of the other theories are predominant, or do you have another? Or is it all bs and they aren't any different from any other sports stars.