Crucifiction of the English Language


darkbeaver
#91
Quote: Originally Posted by #juanView Post

I skimmed through this topic and I didn't see it mentioned but my biggest beef is people who use "your" as "you're".


Perhaps your exposed to it to much somewhere.
 
#juan
#92
Quote: Originally Posted by darkbeaverView Post

Perhaps your exposed to it to much somewhere.

Go eat you're hat.
 
VanIsle
#93
Quote: Originally Posted by #juanView Post

I skimmed through this topic and I didn't see it mentioned but my biggest beef is people who use "your" as "you're".

Yours and mine.
 
JLM
Avatar
#94
Quote: Originally Posted by IslandpacificView Post

Yours and mine.

One that I hear a lot that irks me a bit although it may be grammatically correct is the expression "it's a good read", when referring to a book they've read. What's the matter with the old expression we used for years "it's good reading"? Another one is the word "utilize" which means absolutely nothing more than "use"- why use 7 letters when 3 will do to say exactly the same thing?
 
Cliffy
Avatar
#95
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

One that I hear a lot that irks me a bit although it may be grammatically correct is the expression "it's a good read", when referring to a book they've read. What's the matter with the old expression we used for years "it's good reading"? Another one is the word "utilize" which means absolutely nothing more than "use"- why use 7 letters when 3 will do to say exactly the same thing?

Ah, the more cylinders in a word, the more intelligent it sounds! For some, it is just being pretentious.
 
L Gilbert
#96
hehehe Is that like regardless and irregardless?
 
JLM
Avatar
#97
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

Ah, the more cylinders in a word, the more intelligent it sounds! For some, it is just being pretentious.

Yep, sometimes big words have a slightly different shade of meaning than the small word, but a large percentage of the people who use them have NO idea what they mean- REGARDLESS.
 
Blackleaf
Avatar
#98
Prince Philip once called the lefty BBC the Bolshevik Broadcasting Corporation.



John Prescott, who was Britain's Deputy Prime Minister between 1997 and 2007, was famous for his mangling of our great language.

In 2008, he even admitted that he has a problem with the language and grammar, which he blamed on him receiving a poor education (after all, being a lefty, he must think all these "posh" schools such as Eton, Oxford and Cambridge are just for "toffs" and royals).

He also has a problem with his weight - he weighs a whopping 16 and a half stone, and admitted last year he once suffered bulimia.

Here are some prescottisms:

On the environment: "The Green Belt is a Labour initiative and we intend to build on it."

On housing: "Any definition of homelessness that suggests that people haven’t got a home is not good."

On foreign affairs: "My position is that I want to make our position clear. The example in Germany is just one example, for example."

He once said that industrial disputes can be solved through "meditation", and that when he was an unemployed seaman (he used to be a waiter in the Merchant Navy working for Cunard) he "had to live in one of these hostiles."



He was also known for his violence towards members of the public. Whilst out campaigning during the 2001 General Election, Mr Prescott punched a man in the face after he threw an egg at Mr Prescott.
Last edited by Blackleaf; Apr 26th, 2009 at 10:27 AM..
 
YukonJack
#99
Just look at all the posts here!

Has there ever been a more pathetic illiterate bunch of nobodies anywhere??

Grammar, out the window.
Punctuation totally unknown.
Coherent thoughts - forget it.

We are the victims of a generation of Unionized illterates masquarading as teachers. Not only us, but even more regrettably, our children and even more so, absolutely, cryingly regrettably, our grand children.
 
VanIsle
#100
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

hehehe Is that like regardless and irregardless?

So many people use the word irregardless that even though it was never a word, some dictionaries now explain why it is wrong.
ir·re·gard·less (irÅi gärdÆlis), adv. Nonstandard.
regardless.
[1910–15; IR-2 (prob. after irrespective) + REGARDLESS]
Usage. IRREGARDLESS is considered nonstandard because of the two negative elements ir- and -less. It was probably formed on the analogy of such words as irrespective, irrelevant, and irreparable. Those who use it, including on occasion educated speakers, may do so from a desire to add emphasis. IRREGARDLESS first appeared in the early 20th century and was perhaps popularized by its use in a comic radio program of the 1930s.
 
VanIsle
#101
Quote: Originally Posted by YukonJackView Post

Just look at all the posts here!

Has there ever been a more pathetic illiterate bunch of nobodies anywhere??

Grammar, out the window.
Punctuation totally unknown.
Coherent thoughts - forget it.

We are the victims of a generation of Unionized illterates masquarading as teachers. Not only us, but even more regrettably, our children and even more so, absolutely, cryingly regrettably, our grand children.

True. You have lived in this country a long time so you can no longer use the "immigrant" excuse. Masquerade is spelled with an "e" and illiterate is spelled with an "i". If you are going to tell us how dumb we are, at least spell it out to us with correct spelling.
 
JLM
Avatar
#102
Quote: Originally Posted by VanIsleView Post

True. You have lived in this country a long time so you can no longer use the "immigrant" excuse. Masquerade is spelled with an "e" and illiterate is spelled with an "i". If you are going to tell us how dumb we are, at least spell it out to us with correct spelling.

Yeah, Y.J. In this country we have an old adage "practice what you preach"
 
Cliffy
Avatar
#103
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Yeah, Y.J. In this country we have an old adage "practice what you preach"

I haven't been here all day so I am happy that there are others here to keep ol' Jack in line.
 
JLM
Avatar
#104
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

I haven't been here all day so I am happy that there are others here to keep ol' Jack in line.

The trouble is when you do that he tends to get up on his hind legs.
 
Cliffy
#105
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

The trouble is when you do that he tends to get up on his hind legs.

... or cock a leg on his rocking chair. (squirt, squirt!)
 
JLM
#106
Quote: Originally Posted by CliffyView Post

... or cock a leg on his rocking chair. (squirt, squirt!)


Be nice Cliff, it's Mother's Day.
 
YukonJack
#107
"True. You have lived in this country a long time so you can no longer use the "immigrant" excuse. Masquerade is spelled with an "e" and illiterate is spelled with an "i"."

If blacks, sorry, African-Canadians can use the "black" and "slavery" excuse time and time again, after 150 years, time again, surely I can use the "immigrant" excuse once more.

At least, I raised myself out of the gutter. If African-Canadians had done the same, this would not even be an issue.

Your arguement is pathetically weak if you have to resort to misspellings.

Sorry for offending your sensibilities by not spelling the favourite game of liberals (masquarede) correctly. Or for that matter, omitting an "I". If that is all you have to support your argument, I pity you.

Far less worse than your omitting any coherence.
 
lone wolf
#108
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

Be nice Cliff, it's Mother's Day.

So ... on that note, is it Mom or Mum?
 
JLM
Avatar
#109
Quote: Originally Posted by YukonJackView Post

"True. You have lived in this country a long time so you can no longer use the "immigrant" excuse. Masquerade is spelled with an "e" and illiterate is spelled with an "i"."

If blacks, sorry, African-Canadians can use the "black" and "slavery" excuse time and time again, after 150 years, time again, surely I can use the "immigrant" excuse once more.

At least, I raised myself out of the gutter. If African-Canadians had done the same, this would not even be an issue.

Your arguement is pathetically weak if you have to resort to misspellings.

Sorry for offending your sensibilities by not spelling the favourite game of liberals (masquarede) correctly. Or for that matter, omitting an "I". If that is all you have to support your argument, I pity you.

Far less worse than your omitting any coherence.

"Nothing defines a nation better than the language the people speak.

So, denigrate a language, denigrate a nation/people.

FAR, far, far worse than denigrating blacks or gays."
Before posting, Y.J. you should look back to see that it doesn't contradict previous statements you've made.
 
YukonJack
#110
JLM, your post #109 is a perfect example of mysterious nonsense.
 
JLM
Avatar
#111
Quote: Originally Posted by YukonJackView Post

JLM, your post #109 is a perfect example of mysterious nonsense.

I'd say you are half right, don't see anything mysterious, as a I was just copying what you said. I wasn't going to call it nonsense but if you insist be my guest.
 
VanIsle
#112
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolfView Post

So ... on that note, is it Mom or Mum?

In my house it's Mom. My sister is called Mum by her kids. They both work.
But then in my house, my husband is "Dad" and at my sister's, her husband is called "Pop".
 
VanIsle
#113
Quote: Originally Posted by YukonJackView Post

"True. You have lived in this country a long time so you can no longer use the "immigrant" excuse. Masquerade is spelled with an "e" and illiterate is spelled with an "i"."

If blacks, sorry, African-Canadians can use the "black" and "slavery" excuse time and time again, after 150 years, time again, surely I can use the "immigrant" excuse once more.

At least, I raised myself out of the gutter. If African-Canadians had done the same, this would not even be an issue. (Excuse me?)

Your arguement is pathetically weak if you have to resort to misspellings.
I only commented on yours because I felt exactly the same way about what you had to say.

Sorry for offending your sensibilities by not spelling the favourite game of liberals (masquarede) correctly. Or for that matter, omitting an "I". If that is all you have to support your argument, I pity you.

Far less worse than your omitting any coherence.

I think you need to add in a post number here YJ
 
L Gilbert
Avatar
#114
Mum is usually the spelling used in Ireland and the UK and a few other places. Mom is a NorthAm thing but they both mean the same and sound sorta the same.
 
L Gilbert
Avatar
#115
People seem to have made misspelling a habit these days. As long as there are some that use correct spelling, I can't see the big deal until one misspeller calls another misspeller on their spelling. Then it's just funny.
 
JLM
Avatar
#116
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

Mum is usually the spelling used in Ireland and the UK and a few other places. Mom is a NorthAm thing but they both mean the same and sound sorta the same.

When I was a kid learning how to spell it was "Mum" and I notice whenever the Queen's Mother is referred to it's the "Queen Mum". I was probably in my teens or 20s before I encountered "Mom". Now 3/4 of the people use "mom". I think that may be an American bastardization.
 
lone wolf
Avatar
#117
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

When I was a kid learning how to spell it was "Mum" and I notice whenever the Queen's Mother is referred to it's the "Queen Mum". I was probably in my teens or 20s before I encountered "Mom". Now 3/4 of the people use "mom". I think that may be an American bastardization.

Just had the same debate with a very Brit uncle. "Mom" is one of those damned colonial conspiracies, don'cha know?

--

Oops! Perhaps not....
 
VanIsle
#118
Quote: Originally Posted by L GilbertView Post

People seem to have made misspelling a habit these days. As long as there are some that use correct spelling, I can't see the big deal until one misspeller calls another misspeller on their spelling. Then it's just funny.

I fully agree and generally speaking, I don't point out spelling mistakes. It is just so easy to type in a wrong letter. In the post I pointed it out in, the person was making every effort to tell us just how wrong we are and how poor we are at typing. I just could not resist the urge this time. I think most of us know when it comes to typing a post, we believe we have typed every word right and if we have not, then we know that the reader understands because the reader has the brains to understand. These are not formal letters.
 
JLM
Avatar
#119
Quote: Originally Posted by lone wolfView Post

Just had the same debate with a very Brit uncle. "Mom" is one of those damned colonial conspiracies, don'cha know?

--

Oops! Perhaps not....

On the other side of the coin L.W. perhaps you've noticed that the English are the damndest spellers as is evident in words like "night" "right" and "light". And then you have "might" and "mite". And inconsistencies like "collar" and "holler" and "bough" and "tough"- not only can they not spell but they can't pronounce properly. I think when they were generating words they may have been doing under various degrees of sobriety and then just forgot the next morning.
 
Cliffy
Avatar
#120
Quote: Originally Posted by JLMView Post

On the other side of the coin L.W. perhaps you've noticed that the English are the damndest spellers as is evident in words like "night" "right" and "light". And then you have "might" and "mite". And inconsistencies like "collar" and "holler" and "bough" and "tough"- not only can they not spell but they can't pronounce properly. I think when they were generating words they may have been doing under various degrees of sobriety and then just forgot the next morning.

"I don't know. I was really drunk at the time." - Pink Floyd: Dark Side of the Moon

Perhaps we could attribute a lot about the Brits to their dark ale.
 

Similar Threads

4
Outstanding moments in English language
by Cliffy | Mar 31st, 2009
5
english language in quebec
by Alexis06 | May 12th, 2006
no new posts