In isolation, an atomic structure of a rock and a physical body are indistinguishable. In other words, looking at either one would not indicate if it came from a living being or an inert object.

Quite apart from the obvious question of how you can possibly know that, that means it can't have any impact on us. If a living universe isn't detectably different from a non-living universe, the distinction doesn't matter at all and speculating about it is meaningless.

Quite so. I believe they are called conservatives. One can only hope that eventually they will find their own road to extinction.

I believe this topic has descended into silly.
So far, what have humming beings come up with regarding our rise to the top of (at least in our own minds) food chain/evolutionary ladder? 1. Some invisible man created it all because he was bored, 2. Darwin's concept of evolution, 3. A quantum physics approach that says There is no matter just energy, so physical reality is just a hologram, 4. Aliens genetically modified early humanoids with their own DNA to create a hybrid human. And then there is 5. my little theory born of an early morning brain fart.
Beam me up Scotty, there is no intelligent life on this planet!

It's probably the most broadly applicable theory we have. Too narrowly focused on what, what's it not considering that it should?

Only in the minds of modern mystics. Sounds like you've been taking seriously people like Deepak Chopra, Fritjof Capra and Gary Zukav, and stuff like the "What the Bleep Do We Know" movie. Google "quantum quackery" and read the first half a dozen returns. The complexity and counter-intuitive nature of quantum theory lend themselves to all kinds of bizarre misinterpretations, but the science is fully consistent with an objective physical reality that exists independently of and is not influenced by any mind's perceptions and desires.

That would make liberals considerably more intelligent than conservatives would it not?