The Origin from Zero Vacuum: T=0K.

[socratus]

TheOrigin from Zero Vacuum: T=0K.
=.
Vacuum energy. Vacuum fluctuation/polarization/transformation.
==..
Theoreticians say that leaving our ‘atomistic- matter’
paradigm behind, and taking ‘virtual antiparticles’,
we realized that the Cosmos / Vacuum ‘polarized ‘
itself, and the result ofthis polarization we know
as our world.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_polarization
#
“ Its effects can be observed in various phenomena
(such as spontaneous emission, the Casimir effect, the
van der Waals bonds, or the Lamb shift), and it is thought
to have consequences for the behavior of the Universe
on cosmological scales. “
/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_energy
#
In quantum field theory,and specifically quantumelectrodynamics,
vacuum polarization describes a process in which a background
electromagnetic fieldproduces virtual electron–positron pairs that
change the distribution of charges andcurrents that generated
the original electromagnetic field. It isalso sometimes referred
toas the self energy of the gauge boson (photon).
Vacuum polarization was observedexperimentally in 1997 using
the TRISTAN particle accelerator in Japan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum_polarization
#
Light Created from a Vacuum:
Casimir Effect Observedin Superconducting Circuit
/ScienceDaily (Nov. 18,2011) /
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/11/111118133050.htm
#
Chalmers scientists create light from vacuum
http://www.chalmers.se/en/news/Pages/Chalmers-scientists-create-light-from-vacuum.aspx
#
Although we are used to thinking of empty space as containing
nothing at all, and therefore having zero energy, the quantum
rules say that there is some uncertainty about this. Perhaps each
tiny bit of the vacuum actually contains rather a lot of energy.
If the vacuum contained enough energy, it could convert this
into particles, in line with E-Mc^2.
/ Book: Stephen Hawking. Pages 147-148.
By Michael White and JohnGribbin. /
#
‘ Somehow, the energy is extracted from the vacuum and turned
into particles...Don'ttry it in your basement, but you can do it.’
/ -- Universityof Chicago cosmologist Rocky Kolb /
From Vacuum’s fluctuations / transformation / polarization 'somehow'
the Origin of the Material Existence begins.
============…
P.S.
Dark Energy may be Vacuum
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-01/uoc-dem011607.php
#
When the next revolution rocks physics,
chances are it will be about nothing—the vacuum, that endless infinite void.
http://discovermagazine.com/2008/aug/18-nothingness-of-space-theory-of-everything
===…

 

[socratus]

The question ‘ what was before: the chicken or the egg ?’is very old and maybe
doesn’t have answer.
Therefore I will ask a simpler questions:
What was before: the ‘bigbang’ or the vacuum?
Does ‘big bang’ create vacuum or vacuum give birth to ‘big bang’?
======= . .

 

[socratus]

How can the Origin appear from Zero Vacuum: T=0K.
=.
According to Dirac in his *vacuum's – holes sea* virtual particles
( antiparticles, particles of dark matter, zooof elementary particles)
exist with negative energy; -E=Mc^2.
Throughso-called *tunneling jump- phenomena* or so-called * vacuum
fluctuation / polarization /transformation* these virtual particles with
negativepotential energy –E=Mc^2 using its owninner spin /
impulse ( h) or ( h*=h/2pi ) can change its condition and become
real particles with energy: E=h*f
Thiseffect can be observed in various phenomena (such as
spontaneousemission, the Casimir effect, the van der Waals bonds,
or the Lamb shift).
============…

 

[socratus]

Everybody knows thatbefore *big bang * was no space, notime.
But nobody can understand that * no space, notime* is zero vacuum.
==..
What was before:an egg or a chicken?
What wasbefore: ‘big bang’ or vacuum?
Does big bang exist in vacuum or vice versa ?
What is the Universe Expanding Into?
==..
'ButI don't want to go among mad people,' said Alice.
'Oh,you can't help that,' said the cat. 'We're all mad here.'
/Alice's Adventures in Wonderland. By Lewis Carroll /
===..

 

[darkbeaver]

Thunderbolts YouTube Channel

Quantum Craziness | Space News
December 29, 2013 by B Talbott
A new paper published by an MIT physicist claims to theoretically prove that so-called “quantum entanglement” — two particles seemingly occupying more than one state simultaneously — gives rise to a wormhole that allows particles to communicate through a “gravitational … Continue reading →

 

[socratus]

Thunderbolts YouTube Channel

Quantum Craziness | Space News
December 29, 2013 by B Talbott
A new paper published by an MIT physicist claims to theoretically prove that so-called “quantum entanglement” — two particles seemingly occupying more than one state simultaneously — gives rise to a wormhole that allows particles to communicate through a “gravitational … Continue reading →

Please, look at picture – photoshop attentively.
You see the thin net – this is infinite flat vacuum T=0K.
And you see sphere which surrounded with curved net –
this is a local gravity space of some star or planet
Newtonian / Einsteinium gravity is local phenomena.
=.

 

[socratus]

Nature and Infinity.
=.
There are two separate infinite substances that exist in Nature:
"infinitely big" and"infinitely small".
The infinitely big substance is Zero Vacuum: T=0K.
( spacetime continues forever)
The infinitely small substance is Planck's constant –
- quantum of light - ( h, h*).
These two constants are fundament of creation everything in Nature.
===..
Best wishes.
Israel Socratus.
=..

 

[socratus]

Vacuum and Quantum of light are still twofundamental puzzles in physics.
==
About quantum of light Einstein wrote:
'‘ All these fifty years of consciousbrooding have brought me
nonearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?'
Nowadays every Tom, **** and Harry thinks heknows it,
but heis mistaken.'‘

And about vacuum there are different opinions.
a)
" The most fundamental question facing 21st century physics will be:
What is the vacuum? As quantum mechanics teaches us, with
its zero point energy this vacuum is not empty and the word
vacuum is a gross misnomer!."
/ Prof. Friedwardt Winterberg /
b)
‘ It is true . . .there is such a thing as absolute zero; we cannot
reach temperatures below absolute zero not because we are not
sufficiently clever but because temperatures below absolute zero
simple have no meaning.’
/ Book : ‘Dreams of a final theory’. Page 138. By Steven Weinberg./
c).
‘If wewere looking for something that we could conceive
of as God within the universe of the newphysics, this ground
state, coherent quantum vacuum might be agood place to start.’
/ Book ‘The quantum self ’ page 208, by Danah Zohar.
/
Conclusion.
As Paul Dirac wrote:
" The problem of the exact description of vacuum, in my opinion,
is the basic problem now before physics. Really, if you can't correctly
describe the vacuum, how it is possible to expect a correct description
of something more complex? "
=.
So, what is *philosophy of science* if we don't know these two simplest
but fundamental structure of the Universe?
=====…