NDP Cancels Private Health/Lab Scheme-Return Work To Public Sector

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
"I'm convinced that we can do high quality, world-class work in the public sector,"






Health Minister Sarah Hoffman announced today that her government will not go ahead with a proposed plan to expand private laboratory services and build a 'mega-lab' in Edmonton.


"We're not moving forward with any project," Hoffman said.


She has ordered Alberta Health Services to cancel the request for proposals on a $3-billion laboratory contract that was awarded last year under the previous government to an Australian company called Sonic.


Last October, Alberta Health Services announced that Sonic Healthcare of Australia had been chosen as the preferred vendor for a 15-year contract to provide hospital and private lab services in the capital region.


DynaLife, the company that had done much of that lab work for years, launched an appeal of that decision. The text of the decision was released on Thursday


The government now plans to review how to deliver lab services in Alberta before making any decisions.


The Health Sciences Association of Alberta represents 1,100 DynaLife lab workers and another 500 who work in the public system.
President Elisabeth Ballermann said she was pleased with Hoffman's decision. She said her members have long wanted lab services delivered by the public system.


"I'm convinced that we can do high quality, world-class work in the public sector," she said.


Ballermann was also concerned that under the contract, the new facility to house the Edmonton lab would be owned by a private company, not by Albertans.


"We have long held the view that this is a critical piece of public infrastructure that we should, as Albertans, own and operate," she said.




more




Health minister cancels $3B contract, will not expand private services in Alberta - Edmonton - CBC News
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
Nice.

Health professionals and scientists should not be in the private sector.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Another stupid socialist idea. Government has no business in healthcare except perhaps as a common payer. Service will go down and costs will increase.

The next four years is going to really suck for Alberta taxpayers.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83

Because profit doesn't always line up with health or objectivity in science?

This isn't obvious to you?

Another stupid socialist idea. Government has no business in healthcare except perhaps as a common payer. Service will go down and costs will increase.

The next four years is going to really suck for Alberta taxpayers.

Won't someone think about the poor taxprayers?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,656
6,996
113
B.C.
Because profit doesn't always line up with health or objectivity in science?

This isn't obvious to you?



Won't someone think about the poor taxprayers?
Actually profit is all that drives science and scientific advancement .
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,644
7,102
113
Washington DC
Because profit doesn't always line up with health or objectivity in science?

This isn't obvious to you?
So, because profit doesn't ALWAYS line up with health or objectivity in science, scientists should NEVER be allowed to work in the private sector?

By the way, who the f*ck is the government to tell people where they may or may not work?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
So, because profit doesn't ALWAYS line up with health or objectivity in science, scientists should NEVER be allowed to work in the private sector?

By the way, who the f*ck is the government to tell people where they may or may not work?

Leading question

For the record we need to determine what industries benefit from the private sector and which ones are more appropriate for the public sector. I actually agree with a two tier health care system and but science that is primarily motivated by profit is not really science.
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,644
7,102
113
Washington DC
Leading question

For the record we need to determine what industries benefit from the private sector and which ones are more appropriate for the public sector. I actually agree with a two tier health care system and but science that is primarily motivated by profit is not really science.
Ah, and I presume this "determination" will be made by political true believers like you?

What a terrific idea. Put people who don't understand science, don't understand business, and don't understand economics in charge of science, business, and economics.

Oh, and let's not forget to ban sports.

You have all the belief in freedom of ISIS.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,403
11,454
113
Low Earth Orbit
Because profit doesn't always line up with health or objectivity in science?

This isn't obvious to you?



Won't someone think about the poor taxprayers?

96% of scientists work in the private sector. Do you really want to be the one paying me the standard $1350 a day plus per diem?
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
96% of scientists work in the private sector. Do you really want to be the one paying me the standard $1350 a day plus per diem?

As someone who doesn't need the gubmint to help me get through life by unreasonably cutting taxes, I am smart enough to still have a comfortable life and pay taxes for those services that would benefit society.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
When science and progress are on the move I personally do not trust the private
sector. This is a problem that must be shared some private some public but the
oversight and regulation should be in public hands. If they are moving back to the
public sector in this case I am pleased
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
So, because profit doesn't ALWAYS line up with health or objectivity in science, scientists should NEVER be allowed to work in the private sector?

By the way, who the f*ck is the government to tell people where they may or may not work?

For dedicated socialists we should all work for the government. Because BIG Government knows what is best for us.

As someone who doesn't need the gubmint to help me get through life by unreasonably cutting taxes, I am smart enough to still have a comfortable life and pay taxes for those services that would benefit society.

No such thing as unreasonably cutting taxes.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,403
11,454
113
Low Earth Orbit
As someone who doesn't need the gubmint to help me get through life by unreasonably cutting taxes, I am smart enough to still have a comfortable life and pay taxes for those services that would benefit society.
Really? Your employer doesn't get any tax credits? None? Zero? Zip? Nada? Zip zant doodley squat?

Holy f-ck you a complete and total f-cking idiot.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,778
454
83
For dedicated socialists we should all work for the government. Because BIG Government knows what is best for us.



No such thing as unreasonably cutting taxes.

Then we should just get rid of them and enjoy deficit after deficit.

Really? Your employer doesn't get any tax credits? None? Zero? Zip? Nada? Zip zant doodley squat?

Holy f-ck you a complete and total f-cking idiot.

Considering you don't even know what a subsidy is, I don't think you should be giving anyone economic advise.