Wildroser Brian Jean Can't Get Any Respect

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36



The Notley NDP are having a field day this week.

All they have to do is sit back and watch.

Or, when the spirit moves them, they can give Wildrose leader Brian Jean a little jab whenever they feel like it.
It really is like shooting fish in a barrel.

Wednesday afternoon. The legislature’s daily question period.

Jean can’t get a question out without being made a laughing stock by Premier Notley.

Jean is referred to as “the member opposite” and the premier treats him like a punch line.

“I can certainly understand why people in Alberta would be concerned about issues of uncertainty given the member opposite can’t take a position or keep a position for more than three or four hours at a time,” says Notley.

All that’s missing is the drum and the cymbal.

Ba-dum ching.

Another question and Notley again: “I did in fact answer this question yesterday but I can understand the member opposite might, because of his own experience, think it’s important to check positions every day.”

It’s Notley’s Just for Laughs festival.

Notley on a third question: “I understand, given the member opposite’s demonstrated inability to reach and keep a decision, that dithering is the way to go.”

NDP budget boss Smilin’ Joe Ceci is smiling even more than usual as he looks on at the premier’s shtick.

On a fourth question, Notley again plays it up to guffaws from the NDP benches: “He changes his position more often than someone attending yoga classes in my riding, We just can’t keep up.”

Downward dog, indeed. I turn off the TV. It is just too painful.

Where does all this hilarity come from?

Well, you see, on Monday, Wildrose leader Brian Jean says parents should not be informed when kids join a gay-straight alliance, a GSA. Period. Full Stop. Absolutely not.

Then on Tuesday, your columnist is told the press didn’t get the story straight.

There was more to the story and Wildrose leader Brian Jean’s full position and how it would be expressed in the column is discussed with Wildrose staff.

The column concludes by saying, for Jean, there are some occasions when it is OK for parents to be notified their kid is in a GSA.
On Wednesday, Jean puts out a Facebook post.

A sentence in my column read: “Notification would be permissible where the local school or school board determined it was in the best interest of the student and the student was involved in the process.”

In Jean’s Facebook post it reads: “School authorities should be available, if requested by the student, to help the student discuss with parents their involvement in a GSA.”

On Facebook, Jean adds Wildrose “strongly supports parental oversight and input” including with the establishment of GSAs.

And, something totally new, Jean says “parents need to be assured GSAs are not being used to get around the legal requirement to obtain parental consent when discussing issues of human sexuality.”

That sentence is not explained.

On Wednesday, Jean assures the press nothing has changed in his position and how it read in the column was “a good faith error” on the part of Wildrose.

A dogged newshound asks Jean how his message got so badly mangled.

“I’m here today telling you for certain what my position is and my personal opinion is, we shouldn’t out kids,” says Jean.

His personal opinion? Is it Wildrose’s opinion? Just asking.

Notley, now more serious, isn’t finished.

The premier says the opposition is “tying themselves in knots” and they haven’t “come to terms with the fact there is still some underlying discrimination going on in the lens through which they view this problem.”

Ouch.

David Eggen, the education minister, says little. Maybe he thinks politics has the same rules as football and he might get a penalty for piling on.

He does make it clear what Jean feels about GSAs is still not in line with the NDP government’s position.

Before we’re done, a world-weary small-c conservative throws up his hands over what he’s seen the last three days and says: “Leave the gay kids alone.”

Even NDP backbencher Michael Connolly gets his moment upon the stage.

“Albertans are asking: Just what does Brian Jean stand for?”

Wildrose rides the three-day political roller coaster on gay-straight alliances
 

Jinentonix

Hall of Fame Member
Sep 6, 2015
11,619
6,262
113
Olympus Mons
He does make it clear what Jean feels about GSAs is still not in line with the NDP government’s position.
Jean's flip-flopping aside, I wasn't aware that it was the Wildrose's or any other party's duty to fully align themselves with the ruling party's position on anything.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
Jean's flip-flopping aside, I wasn't aware that it was the Wildrose's or any other party's duty to fully align themselves with the ruling party's position on anything.
It's not their duty to align if they don't believe in the cause but the flip flopping can't be ignored. Either he believes in the cause or not as in the following as well as the above.........

This just in: Wildrose Leader Brian Jean thinks feeding hungry children is a good idea.

This shouldn’t be a news flash, of course. But it has taken a week for Jean to provide an answer to a simple question posed to him April 5 — Do you support Premier Rachel Notley spending $10 million to expand a pilot program providing free lunches in needy schools?

Last week, Jean fumbled with a non-committal response that included the robotic statement that we must “get our house in order and start controlling our expenditures.”

A party official said later Jean would have a definitive response in days or weeks. Weeks?

That allowed Notley to gleefully paint Jean as a cold-hearted ditherer who needed “six or seven weeks to figure out if he’s in support of a mere $10-million program to feed hungry kids in schools.”

Anyone who knows Jean realizes he’s not cold-hearted. In fact, he’s arguably the most emotional MLA in the assembly, regularly getting choked up when talking about abused children or the massive fire that a year ago ravaged his constituency of Fort McMurray.

But for a week he was open to attack by the government as speculation grew that he was focused on other things, such as not sticking his foot in his mouth over gay-straight alliances in schools and the complicated political chess game that is the ongoing discussions over merging the Wildrose and Progressive Conservatives this summer.

Finally, on Wednesday of this week, Jean had an answer to the free-lunch question. “Nowhere in Alberta should a child go hungry and I hope that this particular system is going to be implemented in the interests of making sure that all Alberta kids get a good nutritious lunch and a good nutritious meal. And if they can’t get that at home then I think absolutely they need to get it at school.”

Now, was that so hard?

Alberta politicians get themselves in trouble | Edmonton Journal