after she is sued senseless maybe this obama slag can die in a ditch somewhere.
Good God: Lena Dunham's "Rape" Story Gets More Preposterous
Gawker received a leak of Lena Dunham's book proposal a long time ago, and published it. They later took it down after legal threats.
They say the proposal makes it clear who the alleged "rapist" Barry in Lena Dunham's book is.
First things first: In the original book proposal, Lena Dunham describes the "rape," and get this, it's not rape.
Her own description suggests she was eager to have sex -- that is, consenting.
Jesus God Almighty.
In the book she calls this rape, and insinuates more than she describes here. In the book, she suggests she didn't give consent at all.
But in the book proposal, it's clear she consented; she's just objecting to the fact that he decided to go Julian Assange on her.
Now if this could get any worse, which it can't, but let's just keep moving along anyway, it turns out that the "Republican" in question never belonged formally to any party, until 2012, when he registered... as a Democrat.
There is at least one discrepancy between the proposal and what we know about Ungar, however. According to public records, ["Barry"] did not affiliate with either major political party until 2012, when he formally registered as a Democrat. Unlike the character in Dunham's memoir, he does not appear to have ever been an on-the-book Republican--though it's certainly possible he identified as one without ever filing the proper paperwork.You can go over to Gawker to get the details about him. I'm not publishing his name because it now appears to be outright defamatory to claim this guy "Raped" Lena Dunham, and he ought to take that up with her.
http://minx.cc:1080/?post=354069
Who Is Lena Dunham’s Alleged Rapist?
Since its publication this fall, Lena Dunham’s bestselling essay collection, Not That Kind of Girl, has inspired her fans and offered a different kind of inspiration to her foes. The right-wing press, in particular, has taken Dunham’s discursive set of autobiographical writings as a tip sheet to potential scandals and crimes involving the author—who is, as a paragon of metropolitan lefty pop culture, clearly a degenerate.
After a brief effort to paint Dunham’s account of her relationship with her younger sister as a confession of child molestation, her literary investigators have settled on what seems to be an even more fruitful line of inquiry: the essay in which Dunham describes being sexually assaulted as an undergraduate at Oberlin College.
Following the clues in the published text, Dunham’s antagonists have declared that the rape story is a hoax, one that falsely implicates a fellow student. The investigation has led Dunham’s publisher to announce a revision to future editions of the book—confirmation, to her foes, that she is lying, and that her alleged rapist doesn’t exist.
Most mainstream outlets have covered the details of the case with trepidation, if they cover them at all, allowing the central claims of the right-wing account to stand unchallenged. But the investigators aren’t just distasteful. They’re wrong.
Dunham didn’t invent a rapist character out of thin air, as the conservative writers have implied. The 2012 proposal for Not That Kind of Girl recounted the same night of unwanted unprotected sex—and supplied enough specific biographical detail to identify the man being described.
more details
Who Is Lena Dunham’s Alleged Rapist?
Good God: Lena Dunham's "Rape" Story Gets More Preposterous
Gawker received a leak of Lena Dunham's book proposal a long time ago, and published it. They later took it down after legal threats.
They say the proposal makes it clear who the alleged "rapist" Barry in Lena Dunham's book is.
First things first: In the original book proposal, Lena Dunham describes the "rape," and get this, it's not rape.
I basically didn't meet a Republican until I was nineteen, when I shared an ill-fated evening of love-making with our campus' resident conservative, who wore snakeskin boots and hosted a radio show... Mid-intercourse on the moldy dorm rug I looked up into my roommate Sarah's potted plant and noticed something dangling. I tried to make out its nebulous shape and then I realized--it was the condom. [He] had purposely flung the prophylactic into our tiny palm tree, thinking I was too dumb or too drunk or too eager to please to call him on it. [...] The next day, on the radiator in the art building, I told the story to my best friend Audrey who winced. Firstly because he was a Republican and secondly because, she whispered "you were raped."
Incredible. Now, what he did (assuming he did it at all) was dishonest and a violation, but rape?
Her own description suggests she was eager to have sex -- that is, consenting.
Jesus God Almighty.
In the book she calls this rape, and insinuates more than she describes here. In the book, she suggests she didn't give consent at all.
But in the book proposal, it's clear she consented; she's just objecting to the fact that he decided to go Julian Assange on her.
Now if this could get any worse, which it can't, but let's just keep moving along anyway, it turns out that the "Republican" in question never belonged formally to any party, until 2012, when he registered... as a Democrat.
There is at least one discrepancy between the proposal and what we know about Ungar, however. According to public records, ["Barry"] did not affiliate with either major political party until 2012, when he formally registered as a Democrat. Unlike the character in Dunham's memoir, he does not appear to have ever been an on-the-book Republican--though it's certainly possible he identified as one without ever filing the proper paperwork.
http://minx.cc:1080/?post=354069
Who Is Lena Dunham’s Alleged Rapist?
Since its publication this fall, Lena Dunham’s bestselling essay collection, Not That Kind of Girl, has inspired her fans and offered a different kind of inspiration to her foes. The right-wing press, in particular, has taken Dunham’s discursive set of autobiographical writings as a tip sheet to potential scandals and crimes involving the author—who is, as a paragon of metropolitan lefty pop culture, clearly a degenerate.
After a brief effort to paint Dunham’s account of her relationship with her younger sister as a confession of child molestation, her literary investigators have settled on what seems to be an even more fruitful line of inquiry: the essay in which Dunham describes being sexually assaulted as an undergraduate at Oberlin College.
Following the clues in the published text, Dunham’s antagonists have declared that the rape story is a hoax, one that falsely implicates a fellow student. The investigation has led Dunham’s publisher to announce a revision to future editions of the book—confirmation, to her foes, that she is lying, and that her alleged rapist doesn’t exist.
Most mainstream outlets have covered the details of the case with trepidation, if they cover them at all, allowing the central claims of the right-wing account to stand unchallenged. But the investigators aren’t just distasteful. They’re wrong.
Dunham didn’t invent a rapist character out of thin air, as the conservative writers have implied. The 2012 proposal for Not That Kind of Girl recounted the same night of unwanted unprotected sex—and supplied enough specific biographical detail to identify the man being described.
more details
Who Is Lena Dunham’s Alleged Rapist?
