WE really need to get rid of this guy

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,105
1,143
113
59
Alberta
Yeah, the timing is all sus as hell but if any of what this ex speaker alleges is true, the Sask party should not be in power what so ever.
The Liberals are so mired in scandal they can use all the help they can get. But honestly, stick a fork in them.
They are finished.
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
9,953
2,391
113
New Brunswick
Oh, yes, there is, and the polls show that a majority of Canadians agree on who that party is.

No, there isn't.

What "polls" show is that stupid people think anyone other than Trudeau would be better.

That's all it does.

It's not asking them to think beyond that either. No substance, no actual reality, no facts.

Trudeau doesn't deserve leadership because he's fucked the dog long enough.

PP doesn't deserve it because he's done nothing to SHOW he deserves it. All he can do is be a parrot of the Republicans in the US in attitude and idiocy, he has no message other than "Time's up" for Trudeau and his own party is enough of a hotmess of assholes and bigots that voting for them is a vote for Canada turning towards becoming a mini-America. And while you might think that'd be awesome, I'd rather not, thanks.

Singh is just a flaccid dipshit that doesn't know what he's doing.

Bloc will never be anything outside Quebec and that's fine with them.

WILL the PC's win the next election? Probably. No denying that at all.

But that doesn't mean they DESERVE it.
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,649
7,483
113
B.C.
No, there isn't.

What "polls" show is that stupid people think anyone other than Trudeau would be better.

That's all it does.

It's not asking them to think beyond that either. No substance, no actual reality, no facts.

Trudeau doesn't deserve leadership because he's fucked the dog long enough.

PP doesn't deserve it because he's done nothing to SHOW he deserves it. All he can do is be a parrot of the Republicans in the US in attitude and idiocy, he has no message other than "Time's up" for Trudeau and his own party is enough of a hotmess of assholes and bigots that voting for them is a vote for Canada turning towards becoming a mini-America. And while you might think that'd be awesome, I'd rather not, thanks.

Singh is just a flaccid dipshit that doesn't know what he's doing.

Bloc will never be anything outside Quebec and that's fine with them.

WILL the PC's win the next election? Probably. No denying that at all.

But that doesn't mean they DESERVE it.
You really have your finger on the pulse of the nation . s/
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

The End of the Dog is Coming!
Mar 19, 2006
12,105
1,143
113
59
Alberta
No, there isn't.

What "polls" show is that stupid people think anyone other than Trudeau would be better.

That's all it does.
Take a minute.
It's not asking them to think beyond that either. No substance, no actual reality, no facts.

Trudeau doesn't deserve leadership because he's fucked the dog long enough.
Take another. Deep breaths.
PP doesn't deserve it because he's done nothing to SHOW he deserves it. All he can do is be a parrot of the Republicans in the US in attitude and idiocy, he has no message other than "Time's up" for Trudeau and his own party is enough of a hotmess of assholes and bigots that voting for them is a vote for Canada turning towards becoming a mini-America. And while you might think that'd be awesome, I'd rather not, thanks.
I don't think anything is fantastic, but that's what happens when a party becomes extremist. It was all "Woot! Woot! Send us our checks, spend spend spend," until food, rent, heating, and electricity doubled.

Of the four, he is the only logical answer to try and clean this shit show up.

Singh is just a flaccid dipshit that doesn't know what he's doing.
Yeah, I get the reference. He's a limp dick. It was his mouth Justin dug most anyway.
Bloc will never be anything outside Quebec and that's fine with them.

WILL the PC's win the next election? Probably. No denying that at all.

But that doesn't mean they DESERVE it.

"Deserve's gotta nothing to do with it," said Wiliam Munny, and then Blam!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Serryah

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
9,953
2,391
113
New Brunswick
I don't think anything is fantastic, but that's what happens when a party becomes extremist. It was all "Woot! Woot! Send us our checks, spend spend spend," until food, rent, heating, and electricity doubled.

Of the four, he is the only logical answer to try and clean this shit show up.

Okay, explain why? What has he said he would do to fix all the issues (or as many as he can) that Trudeau either created or exacerbated in his tenure?

Why is HE the only logical answer?
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
25,947
9,442
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
The Liberals are so mired in scandal they can use all the help they can get. But honestly, stick a fork in them.
They are finished.
I'm all for that.

The problem is, there is no other party that should/could/can replace them.
I concur with your assessment of the situation. I don’t think anybody can replace them in the manner that they have conducted themselves. Multiple ethical violations; faux feminism and an attempt to interfere in an investigation of a Quebec company both exposed by the treatment of Jody Wilson-Raybould; interference in fire mitigation to the point of devastating fires in B.C.; plans to increase a carbon tax the vast majority of Canadians want scrapped altogether; failure to even look like they care about exploding antisemitism; appointing an anti-racism czar who turned out to be a racist; refusal to tell the public who they suspect of treason while seeming to do nothing to stop it and stonewalling an investigation; a massive increase in the size of the federal government with no discernable benefit to the public; almost nothing done with huge promises to the Indigenous community, which includes mocking and removing from a Liberal fundraiser natives who had the temerity to ask for clean drinking water; Liberal ministers giving lucrative contracts to friends and family; the WE scandal; bungling of immigration and refugee programs to the point of refugees living on the street in Toronto while putting upward pressure on already high housing prices in the city; invoking emergency powers and closing bank accounts to counter noise and parking infringements in Ottawa; etc., etc., etc…but other than that/those, etc…so far…with potentially another year to go…
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,999
2,669
113
Toronto, ON
Okay, explain why? What has he said he would do to fix all the issues (or as many as he can) that Trudeau either created or exacerbated in his tenure?

Why is HE the only logical answer?
There are 3 logical choices with any shot at forming a government:
  • Singh
  • PP
  • TrueDope
Singh won't. And TrueDope has shown what a disaster he is so putting him back in would be stupid. What other logical choice is there?
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,649
7,483
113
B.C.
Okay, explain why? What has he said he would do to fix all the issues (or as many as he can) that Trudeau either created or exacerbated in his tenure?

Why is HE the only logical answer?
Axe the tax . Over and over , axe the tax . Get it yet axe the tax .
 

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
27,649
7,483
113
B.C.
There are 3 logical choices with any shot at forming a government:
  • Singh
  • PP
  • TrueDope
Singh won't. And TrueDope has shown what a disaster he is so putting him back in would be stupid. What other logical choice is there?
Anyone but a sinking rotten to the core conservative will do .
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
9,953
2,391
113
New Brunswick
There are 3 logical choices with any shot at forming a government:
  • Singh
  • PP
  • TrueDope
Singh won't. And TrueDope has shown what a disaster he is so putting him back in would be stupid. What other logical choice is there?

Logically?

Demand new leadership for ALL parties.

Trudeau might just be shoved that way soon (we can only hope! Though yeah, I'm not seeing it either cause he's a fucking jerk like other politicians once they get power) and if that does happen, depending on who the new leader might be it might just save the Libs enough to keep seats instead of a total annihilation next year.

But PP and Singh also need replacing.

Considering how tainted all three leaders are, "logically" enough push from the public on the parties to say no, none of these people work, should trigger leadership changes.

But logic and reality don't work sometimes and this is one of them. Too many people are willing to shove in someone totally unfit to lead instead of doing smarter things.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
14,999
2,669
113
Toronto, ON
Logically?

Demand new leadership for ALL parties.

Trudeau might just be shoved that way soon (we can only hope! Though yeah, I'm not seeing it either cause he's a fucking jerk like other politicians once they get power) and if that does happen, depending on who the new leader might be it might just save the Libs enough to keep seats instead of a total annihilation next year.

But PP and Singh also need replacing.

Considering how tainted all three leaders are, "logically" enough push from the public on the parties to say no, none of these people work, should trigger leadership changes.

But logic and reality don't work sometimes and this is one of them. Too many people are willing to shove in someone totally unfit to lead instead of doing smarter things.
I think the NDP has a good case for replacing their leader and likely will after the next election.
The Liberals do too but changing leader won't remove the sespool of corruption that is the Liberal party but may win then a few more votes.
The Conservatives have a leader that is appealing to more Canadians than any other leader. And looks to give them a majority. He is also fluent in French and has a pretty sharp whit. Why would they want to replace them? Besides they would never replace him with someone you would consider voting for anyways.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
112,955
12,682
113
Low Earth Orbit
I think the NDP has a good case for replacing their leader and likely will after the next election.
The Liberals do too but changing leader won't remove the sespool of corruption that is the Liberal party but may win then a few more votes.
The Conservatives have a leader that is appealing to more Canadians than any other leader. And looks to give them a majority. He is also fluent in French and has a pretty sharp whit. Why would they want to replace them? Besides they would never replace him with someone you would consider voting for anyways.
He's evil. He thinks parents have Rights.
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
9,953
2,391
113
New Brunswick
I think the NDP has a good case for replacing their leader and likely will after the next election.
The Liberals do too but changing leader won't remove the sespool of corruption that is the Liberal party but may win then a few more votes.

Agreed.

The Conservatives have a leader that is appealing to more Canadians than any other leader.

Compared to leaders you (and I ) already agree should be replaced.

That doesn't make him appealing. That makes him a 'bit better choice than bad choices'.

People aren't going to vote for the Cons because of PP, they're voting for them because they're not Libs/Trudeau.

That's how we get these continual bullshit Governments over and over and over again.

And looks to give them a majority.

Gods help us if that's true. At least with a minority there might be actual good stuff done for Canada.

He is also fluent in French

Yes, I've seen his fluency in action... being able to repeat a word over and over when asked a question by someone doesn't make him fluent in anything but bullshit.

Being fluent in French doesn't mean jack shit when it's part of your Job description? If he was fluent in say... Spanish, or (and I hate that this'll be a thing) Mandarin Chinese or maybe Hindi or Russian, then that'd be more impressive and useful.

and has a pretty sharp whit.

He hides it well if he has wit at all, let alone a sharp one.

Why would they want to replace them?

Because he offers nothing.

Besides his "Axe the Tax" (which isn't a thing) and anything anti-Trudeau, what one good thing is there that he said he'd do? Where's one discussion where he actually respects ALL Canadians, and not "just the chosen few" (those being pro Conservative).

I'm not saying he's the only asshole politician that doesn't do shit he should, they all do but I'd rather not have a repeat and worse of Trudeau, thanks.

Besides they would never replace him with someone you would consider voting for anyways.

Really? That's a huge assumption on your part.

Then again maybe you're right, I wouldn't vote for anyone who is part of THIS so called Conservative party.

Give me actual Canadian Conservatives and not American mini-wannabe's, then maybe we'll talk.


Here, I'll give you an example of why I DON'T like PP - that isn't based on his sexism or his stupidity over LGBTQIA+ issues (or Climate Change which for me is a HUGE issue due to where I live).

He whines like a little bitch about not knowing about affairs of importance that need a security clearance to access. He admits that he COULD get one, but won't, because to get one means that he cannot then talk about or share anything that may divulge information from said matters to the public.

Basically he's the fucking idiot who wants to know all the juicy secrets just so he can share it with everyone else like a fucking gossiping mean girl and see what shit rolls down hill after all the info dump happens.

I would get not understanding the depth of commitment to learn about such issues and not being able to talk about them to ANYONE if he was a newbie to the reality of Federal politics. But PP is not some newbie. For someone who is a CAREER politician (and I thought the Con types hated the career politicians), this is not only in-fucking-sane behaviour, it also shows a serious LACK of understanding of the severity of things that Government needs to know, the rest of society does not. It shows a serious lack of wanting to protect national interests, and people in positions that get us those information at risks to their lives in some cases. It shows he doesn't give a damn about how such things may affect not just Canada but other countries as well, and it's all about how he'd use that info for his gains alone.

He'd be the fucking idiot in a game of poker who would give himself away first chance he could.

Someone like THAT should be nowhere NEAR being leader of our country.
 

Serryah

Executive Branch Member
Dec 3, 2008
9,953
2,391
113
New Brunswick

I also gotta say... I do like getting back cash from the Government even if it's just a little bit (mine was more than 'a little bit' though).