Wage theft on the rise in the US

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
149
63
Employers are being cracked down on by State and Federal regulators more than at any time in the past. In some cases, overtime hours are not being paid out by payroll. In other cases, the employer forced employees to sign blank time sheets so that they could record 'minimal' hours of work. FedEx, has classified it's drivers as independent contractors to avoid paying overtime.

"I’m amazed at how petty and abusive some of these practices are. Cutting corners is increasingly seen as a sign of libertarianism rather than the theft that it really is."
New York Attorney General, Eric T. Schneiderman

I worked a crappy job after high school for about one year, unloading trucks for Zeller's. Something similar happened to me, though in the end it was some criminal fraud and embezzlement by the HR manager. And off to university I went!
 

Tonington

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 27, 2006
15,441
149
63
Most Trucking companies are federally registered so that when you have a labor dispute they don't have to answer to the province.

Sounds a bit like registering a ship in the Bahamas. Though I hope you don't have to deal with Somali pirates...
 

Retired_Can_Soldier

Rock Hard Member
Mar 19, 2006
10,929
78
48
56
Alberta
Sounds a bit like registering a ship in the Bahamas. Though I hope you don't have to deal with Somali pirates...

Yeah its similar., I work for a company that treats its drivers pretty fair and pays well, but I'm in Alberta, you don't find a lot of that elsewhere.
 

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Nearly 10 years ago, Delores Killingsworth Barber, then 25 and an employee at a Roosevelt Boulevard Walmart, took the witness stand in a Philadelphia courtroom and told a judge and jury that the retail giant was "stealing our time."

It got worse during the holidays, when, she testified, workers were told to "do whatever it takes to get it done, and if that meant missing your break, that's what had to be done."

Many years and boxes of legal documents later, the workers should be paid for those missed breaks.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court said it would not take up a lost-wages case involving 186,000 current and former Wal-Mart Stores Inc. employees, clearing the way for the workers, all from Pennsylvania, and their lawyers to receive $187 million in the class-action suit.

With interest, the employees, who had been owed $140 million of the $187 million, will now split $224 million, said their attorney, Michael D. Donovan of Donovan Litigation Group in Berwyn.

"Wage theft will not be tolerated, and class actions are an optimal way for large numbers of workers to recover wages stolen by their employers," Donovan said Monday.

Wal-Mart spokesman Randy Hargrove said: "We are disappointed the Supreme Court decided not to review our case. While we continue to believe these claims should not be bundled together in a class-action lawsuit, we respect the court's decision."

The case began in 2002, when Michelle Braun, working at the Walmart store in Franklin Mills, joined other colleagues in filing a wage-and-hour lawsuit against the retailer.

Wal-Mart appealed, saying that the class should not have been certified and that each of the 186,000 workers should have had to testify individually about his or her particular circumstances.

Pennsylvania's Supreme Court affirmed the jury verdict in December 2014, saying that Wal-Mart's own records provided the necessary evidence.

Hargrove said that over the last decade, Wal-Mart "has taken additional steps, including enhancing our time-keeping systems. We want to make sure we pay employees for every hour worked and provide paid meal and rest breaks."

Supreme Court refuses to hear Wal-Mart case; Pa. workers owed $224M