Viking Age 793 A.D - 1066 A.D

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
The Viking Age is the name of the period between 793 and 1066 AD in Scandinavia and Britain, following the Germanic Iron Age (and the Vendel Age in Sweden). During this period, the Vikings, Scandinavian warriors, leidangs and traders, raided and explored most parts of Europe, south-western Asia, northern Africa and north-eastern North America. Apart from exploring Europe by way of its oceans and rivers with the aid of their advanced navigational skills and extending their trading routes across vast parts of the continent, they also engaged in warfare and looted and enslaved numerous Christian communities of Medieval Europe for centuries, contributing to the development of feudal systems in Europe, which included castles and barons (which were a defense against Viking raids).

Viking society was based on agriculture and trade with other peoples and placed great emphasis on the concept of honour both in combat and in the criminal justice system.

It is unknown what triggered the Vikings expansion and conquests, but historians have suggested that technological innovations imported from Mediterranean civilizations along with a milder climate led to population growth due to a long period of good crops. Another factor was the destruction of the Frisian fleet by Charlemagne around 785, which interrupted the flow of many trading goods from Central Europe to Scandinavia and led the Vikings to come looking for it themselves.

The beginning of the Viking Age is commonly given as 793, when Vikings raided the important British island monastery of Lindisfarne (although a minor incursion was recorded in 787); and the end of the Viking Age is traditionally marked by the failed invasion of England, attempted by Harald Hårdråde, who was defeated by the Saxon king Harold Godwinson (himself an Anglicised Viking), in 1066. Godwinson himself was next defeated that same year by another Viking descendant, William, Duke of Normandy (Normandy had itself been acquired by Vikings (Normans) in 911).

The clinker-built longships used by the Scandinavians were uniquely suited to both deep and shallow waters, and thus extended the reach of Norse raiders, traders and settlers not only along coastlines, but also along the major river valleys of north-western Europe. Rurik also expanded to the east, and founded the first Russian state, with a capital at Novgorod, (which means, "new city"). According to one author, the word "Rus" originally meant "Viking raider", as distinct from the native slavic peoples. Other Norse people, particularly those from the area that is now modern-day Sweden, continued south on Russian rivers to the Black Sea and then on to Constantinople (which had been established in 667 B.C., and was re-named Constantinople in 330 A.D. by Constantine the Great). Whenever these viking ships would run aground in shallow waters, the Vikings would reportedly turn them on their sides and drag them across the land, into deeper waters.

France, "the Kingdom of the Franks" (a Germanic tribe who settled in Gaul, after the fall of the Roman Empire, and whose famous King was Charlemagne, who had re-united the Kingdom by 771), was particularly hard-hit by these raiders, who could sail down the Seine River with near impunity. The region now known as Normandy (after the Viking "Norsemen, men from the north") was profoundly disrupted during this period.

In 911, the French king, Charles the Simple, was able to make an agreement with the Viking warleader Hrolf Ganger, later called Rollo. Charles gave Hrolf the title of duke, and granted him and his followers possession of Normandy. In return, Hrolf swore fealty to Charles, converted to Christianity, and undertook to defend the northern region of France against the incursions of other Viking groups. The results were, in a historical sense, rather ironic: several generations later, the Norman descendants of these Viking settlers not only thereafter identified themselves as French, but carried the French language, and their variant of the French culture into England in 1066, after the Norman Conquest, and became the ruling aristocracy of Anglo-Saxon England. These Norman Viking descendants, although converting to Christianity, maintained their warlike nature, and eventually adopted chivalry, which joined learning to fight on horseback (like their Moorish enemies in Spain) with becoming knights or "holy warriors" of the Cross. One of their pass-times was jousting, or tournaments of armored knights fighting with lances (the Celtic "lancia") on horse-back.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viking_Age

http://www.hurstwic.org/history/text/history.htm

http://lauraloft.com/viking/viking.htm

Now from history I understood this as the Middle Ages, or a part of the Middle Age period. Which means dark and barbaric.

Viking is a romantic term made up in the 19th cventury by Romantics, so that shouldn't gel with the time, because they weren't called Vikings.

Heathen and Pagan are derogative from Christian conquest of the Asatru people,

and because Asatru is a term that is an Old Norse term I would say the Age should be called the Norman age like the Roman era or something?

What do you guys think?
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
I'm of Norman descent, and I wouldn't peg the end of the "Viking age" at 1066, because there were Norman Kings that ruled England well after 1066. Much of the traditions and forms of government come from there people.

If your aware of this history you probably have picked up on my avatar...that is the William’s Royal crest. I like to think we Normans are the true rulers of Europe and North America (minus Mexico)...bwahahahaha!
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Oh, i totally agree. You could say, in Iceland it never ended at all, and other places as well. For historians they fix that as the end because England was invaded at that time.

But i don't think it ended.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
It actually just started....


This whole English vs. French in Canada is really quite disturbing when you think about it. Because really it's just the English Normans vs the French Normans....as we know, Quebec was colonized by the French Normans, and the English Normans won the battle for supremacy. Now I just have to get that point across to the Quebecers...
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Makes sense. If people could make others understand that viewpoint then everything would be okay.

However, with the Normans there were different kings so even if they are Norman descent-because they were from different areas and had different rulers, they might not get along.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
46,462
1,370
113
England was ruled by the French (or, rather, the Normans) for almost 100 years - 1066 - 1154. (before that, we were ruled, on and off, by the Vikings for 300 years). We call England at that time "Norman England." But I've never heard an age called "Norman Age."

England's Norman Kings.

King William I
Also known as William the Conqueror
Reigned 1066-1087

King William II
Reigned 1087-1100
Killed in a hunting "accident"; probably murdered

King Henry I
Reigned 1100-1135

King Stephen
Reigned 1135-1154
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
The Vikings are a romantic age name for the people who ruled England from 793, to about 1154 A.D.

The Normans and the Vikings are the exact same people.

So instead of Viking which is a 18th century name for these people it should be called the Norman age.
 

Jay

Executive Branch Member
Jan 7, 2005
8,366
3
38
Re: RE: Viking Age 793 A.D - 1066 A.D

Blackleaf said:
England was ruled by the French (or, rather, the Normans) for almost 100 years - 1066 - 1154. (before that, we were ruled, on and off, by the Vikings for 300 years). We call England at that time "Norman England." But I've never heard an age called "Norman Age."

England's Norman Kings.

King William I
Also known as William the Conqueror
Reigned 1066-1087

King William II
Reigned 1087-1100
Killed in a hunting "accident"; probably murdered

King Henry I
Reigned 1100-1135

King Stephen
Reigned 1135-1154


Thanks Balckleaf. Can you tell me if Her Majesty the Queen is related to these Normans at all?

I haven't had the time to look into it yet, but my understanding is she is related to them. Thanks.
 

Calberty

Electoral Member
Dec 7, 2005
277
0
16
One of my favorite books is

'The Story of English' by Robert Macneil

It traces the origins of the English language and the many influences of various cultures and societies on what we call 'English' today. There are quite a few Viking/ Norse words, place names, grammar influences,, etc. in the English language we use today.

The book is at most libraries. It's a bit dated (20 years?) so don't be discouraged by the opening chapter but jump into the actual language origin. It's a fascinating read.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Well there is a story back in the (Eddas) which are basically historical accounts of Viking war stories and such that says that,

Old English and Old Norse were extremely familiar to begin with. And over time they were incorporated together.
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
I think when people talk of the viking age, they are generally talking about that period of time which viking/norse cultural spread across europe in the ways of trade, raids and wars. Once the end of age came so did the decline in that type of norse activity, also I'd argue by the end of that age, Viking/norse culture had changed and also many had conservated to christanity which also changed there aditudes towards raiding, trade and war.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
I think when people talk of the viking age, they are generally talking about that period of time which viking/norse cultural spread across europe in the ways of trade, raids and wars. Once the end of age came so did the decline in that type of norse activity, also I'd argue by the end of that age, Viking/norse culture had changed and also many had conservated to christanity which also changed there aditudes towards raiding, trade and war.

But the term viking is a romantic age name. So I would propose calling it a Norse or Norman age. And in Iceland the Viking/Norse culture pretty much stayed in tact.
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
Norse, yes but a romantic name is not wrong either. I mean we often assoiate names of ages with what the Roman's or Greeks called people. Viking or Norse... *shrugs* Mongolian, or Hun... whatever.

Anyhow I might be wrong with this one but I think the "Norman" age would beconsidered a different culture then that of the Viking/Norse of the early ages as these "vikings" were there to stay and mostly christian with a different set of beliefs or at least changing set of beliefs.

If I remember, as I draw this from memory the viking name came from the Eastern Roman Empire as they often had to deal with them.

But I do not think anyone would think of the Norse (pagans) and the Norse (Chrsitians) as not one fo the great civilizations. Hey they are always in the video games (wink)
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
Jersay said:
Yeah, they are in the video games. :)

I guess that's something.

Well I know it pisses me if if the celts don't get into those games too. I remember when Civ 3 came out and it didn't have the celts. They added them in the expansion. Oh plus the "celts" were a barbaian tribe without the expansion. I was going to write a nasty email! lol.

But anyhow, the Norse were an a great culture and though like many culturers many focus on wars and raids, the Viking/norse, were amazing traders and settlers second to none that I can think of.

A big reason to why the "viking age" or the dark ages have been forwarded in a negitive light was in the collasp of the Western Roman Empire and the lose of the writen latin and education, really. True there was still some but in the west including the norse area's Western Romaization halted and went backwards. But the Norse were there own civilization with there own ways of doing things and I'd say they were strong traders, seafarers, explorers and settlers and the Romans were nt half as good as the "vikings" in those area's.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
But anyhow, the Norse were an a great culture and though like many culturers many focus on wars and raids, the Viking/norse, were amazing traders and settlers second to none that I can think of.

A big reason to why the "viking age" or the dark ages have been forwarded in a negitive light was in the collasp of the Western Roman Empire and the lose of the writen latin and education, really. True there was still some but in the west including the norse area's Western Romaization halted and went backwards. But the Norse were there own civilization with there own ways of doing things and I'd say they were strong traders, seafarers, explorers and settlers and the Romans were nt half as good as the "vikings" in those area's.

Too bad about the Celts in the video game area. They will be recognized more often I hope. However, when the Vikings went to England and Ireland, would it have been the Celts mostly that they fought? Or Anglo-Saxons?
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
Ireland had a good "tourist commercial" a few years ago. Went something like this.. with visuals of sacking mind you.

"First the Romans came, then the anglos and then the saxons, the vikings and then the brits, come to Ireland, you will be the first we invited"

Anyhow it was something like that. was funny as hell.
 

Jersay

House Member
Dec 1, 2005
4,837
2
38
Independent Palestine
Ireland had a good "tourist commercial" a few years ago. Went something like this.. with visuals of sacking mind you.

"First the Romans came, then the anglos and then the saxons, the vikings and then the brits, come to Ireland, you will be the first we invited"

Anyhow it was something like that. was funny as hell.

Had to read it twice but i fine it funny. :lol: