Urgent Update from Ottawa!

bjr70

New Member
Feb 18, 2007
4
0
1
Urgent Autism Update from Ottawa!

As many of you are aware, the Hon. Shawn Murphy tabled Bill C-304, a Private Members' Bill, in the House of Commons in 2006. This Bill, named "National Strategy for the Treatment of Autism Act" is critical to our cause as it would not only include autism treatment in Medicare, but would also require the Federal Minister of Health to develop a National Autism Strategy in consultation with the provinces and table the plan in the House of Commons.

Where is the Bill at? What can you do to help?

For a Bill to become law it must be tabled in the House of Commons (First Reading), debated at Second Reading, studied by a Committee, and then voted on and passed following Third Reading. Then it would go through the same thing in the Senate and then get the Royal Assent from the Governor-General. A Private Members' Bill is entitled to two hours of debate at the Second Reading stage. The second hour of debate was held late in the day on February 14, 2007. The vote on the Bill did not take place afterwards as the procedures the House follows is to delay votes and group them together so that more MPs will be present.

Next: the Bill will be the subject of a vote next Wednesday, February 21, 2007 (subject to the usual change without notice), on whether to refer it to the next stage in the approval process, namely, whether or not to refer it to a Committee (probably the Standing Health Committee). The vote will be one where each MP who is present will have their vote recorded in the Hansard, (as opposed to the shouting of "yeah" or "nay" where you can't tell who voted which way).

If the majority of voting MPs vote on Wed. Feb. 21 to refer the Bill to the Committee Stage (also known as "Reporting Stage"), then the Bill continues to live another day. However, if the majority of voting MPs vote against it, the Bill will be dead. Finished. History.

It appears that the Liberals and NDP are willing to support Bill C-304 being referred to Committee. However, the Bloc Quebecois, and a majority of Conservatives (probably 99%) are against it. Whereas the Conservatives were willing to support Motion M-172 to create a National Autism Strategy a few months ago, the Motion is not law and not binding. This Bill C-304 would force the government to put words into action.

What should the autism community do in the critical next few days? What can you do to help promote our common interests?

Probably the best thing our community could do is to contact backbench Conservative MPs and lobby them to vote in favour of referring the matter to the Committee stage. Please contact your MP and any others that you have time to contact and ask them to support Bill C-304 and at least give it a chance to be studied by the Committee. The contact information for all MPs is available from www.parl.gc.ca

Please spread the word. Time is of the essence. Please take a moment to send your MP and others a message. Below is a same that you can use. Thank you.


Dear XXX, MP:

Re: Support for Bill C-304 Autism Strategy Bill

I am writing to urge you to vote in support of Bill C-304 when the Bill is subject to a vote in the House of Commons. Bill C-304, the "National Strategy for the Treatment of Autism Act" is of critical importance to families with members who suffer from autism. The Centres for Disease Control in the U.S. just recently reported that the prevalence rates of Autism Spectrum Disorders have increased to 1 in 150. By any standard this is a national public health crisis. Yet, not one province offers the core healthcare treatment for autism under Medicare and there is no National Autism Strategy to deal with this growing epidemic. The government has recently made announcements of a National Cancer Strategy, National Heart Health Strategy, National Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Strategy, etc. Although the federal government announced some autism consultation initiatives in November 2006 and supported a motion for a National Autism Strategy in December 2006, these are non-binding and largely symbolic window dressing. Words are not enough. We need action. Please vote to refer Bill C-304 to the next stage in the approval process and let the Committee examine the Bill and do its work. Please urge your fellow MPs to support the Bill. Thank you.
 
Last edited:

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
I've often wondered why our health care system neglected the treatment of autism. Not doing so in my opinion is a violation of the Canada Health Act.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
I agree, but why is it neglected, why is this such a battle, can you bring me up to speed. I must admit, I'm not in full knowledge of the situation here.
 

temperance

Electoral Member
Sep 27, 2006
622
16
18
Why vote it down ? why would they vote it down ,I see no reason ,please explain Thanks
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Money and political will are the two drivers. It doesn't matter how "right" it may be to do anything under the Canada Health Act, if the political will isn't there to make it happen there are no guarantees. We'll see how this one goes.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
This seems to be a tad disingenuous...

It appears that the Liberals and NDP are willing to support Bill C-304 being referred to Committee. However, the Bloc Quebecois, and a majority of Conservatives (probably 99%) are against it. Whereas the Conservatives were willing to support Motion M-172 to create a National Autism Strategy a few months ago, the Motion is not law and not binding. This Bill C-304 would force the government to put words into action

If I remeber correctly, I've been hearing blurbs about this for quite a few years, it has never really grabbed my attention, though I am curious now, but if this is a long standing issue, why is this suddenly being supported by a party that had isnored the issue in the past?
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Because it's all politics. If political points can't be won there is no political will to spend more money no matter how righteous the cause.
 

temperance

Electoral Member
Sep 27, 2006
622
16
18
I see so If one of the political leader in power happens to have a child (or a Friend family member )affected (Austism)then it passes ,right Am I catching on ??
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
I see so If one of the political leader in power happens to have a child (or a Friend family member )affected (Austism)then it passes ,right Am I catching on ??

I don't what the numbers are but if 99% of the population is unaffected by autism and that 99% doesn't care either way then the political will to spend more money is often a non-starter. But if the majority of that group can be swayed politically to support it then there are political points to be won by suddenly finding it a treatment that should be covered.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
Even though I fall within the 99% range here, I find it hard to understand how any political party could not find this an important issue. As you pointed out Kreskin, it should fall under the Canada Health Act.

If it is a health issue, as it obviously is, then something should be done. Our Healthcare system is what truly seperates us from the animals. By ignoring this issue, for whatever reason, politicians just prove to me once again, they are not fit to breath the same air Tommy Douglas once did.
 

Kreskin

Doctor of Thinkology
Feb 23, 2006
21,155
149
63
Even though I fall within the 99% range here, I find it hard to understand how any political party could not find this an important issue. As you pointed out Kreskin, it should fall under the Canada Health Act.

If it is a health issue, as it obviously is, then something should be done. Our Healthcare system is what truly seperates us from the animals. By ignoring this issue, for whatever reason, politicians just prove to me once again, they are not fit to breath the same air Tommy Douglas once did.

Absolutely. If I remember correctly the primary objective of the Canada Health Act is to promote, restore and protect the physical and mental health of Canadians without financial or other barriers.

What our healthcare system is good at is diagnosistics, but once diagnosed with something the "barrier-free" treatment varies significantly between health issues.
 
Last edited:

bjr70

New Member
Feb 18, 2007
4
0
1
I agree, but why is it neglected, why is this such a battle, can you bring me up to speed. I must admit, I'm not in full knowledge of the situation here.

The prevalence of autism has over the last 10 years really come to light. The CDC just recently reported 1:150 of the population will have some degree of autism spectrum disorder.

ABA (Applied Behavioral Analyasis) is a scientifically proven method of therapy that can help an autistic person reach full potential. It is expensive, but not nearly as expensive to society as not providing autism programs. Autism lasts lifetime.

In Canada, there is a patchwork (or absence) of autism programs. For example in Alberta there is help to age 18 - Ontario you are cut off at 6. Funding is sketchy - the government and the provinces play a game of jurisdiction. Famillies are struggling to pay for autism services; some move to find the services for their autistic kids.

This is why I advocate for a National Autism Strategy. All autistic Canadians should recieve the same level of services no matter where they live in this country.
 

CDNBear

Custom Troll
Sep 24, 2006
43,839
207
63
Ontario
The prevalence of autism has over the last 10 years really come to light. The CDC just recently reported 1:150 of the population will have some degree of autism spectrum disorder.

ABA (Applied Behavioral Analyasis) is a scientifically proven method of therapy that can help an autistic person reach full potential. It is expensive, but not nearly as expensive to society as not providing autism programs. Autism lasts lifetime.

In Canada, there is a patchwork (or absence) of autism programs. For example in Alberta there is help to age 18 - Ontario you are cut off at 6. Funding is sketchy - the government and the provinces play a game of jurisdiction. Famillies are struggling to pay for autism services; some move to find the services for their autistic kids.

This is why I advocate for a National Autism Strategy. All autistic Canadians should recieve the same level of services no matter where they live in this country.
Excellent, GOOD ON YOU, I can't help, but to feel for you. I can draw several examples of your fight, and find an equal comparison to the fight I have within my Native community, albeit both admirable challenges, yours seems to be purely righteous.
I will undoutedly send an email to Peter Van Loan, our local MP and respectfully submit my support of this action.

I hope my actions help.

Keep the faith...

Bear
 

Sparrow

Council Member
Nov 12, 2006
1,202
23
38
Quebec
My msge is sent. My opinon of politicians, when they pass the front doors of parliment they cease being human and become an unfeeling cog in the gear of government. It is however a little bit our own fault, we complain with words but never in action. Someone I know how used to be in parliment told me that they listen to us when we literally flood their offices with e-mails and phone calls. He said that when this happens it sort of wakes them up and they take notice. It is not a guarantee but is sure puts bee under their bonnet.