UK tops league for toxic traffic fumes

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,914
1,907
113
Britain has the worst air pollution from traffic in Europe, according to a government report.

The fumes on certain stretches of British roads breach safety levels in a whopping 95% of cities and regions in the UK, compared with 82% in Austria, 52% in Germany and just 21% in France.

This raises the possibility that Britain may revert to its status, which it had in the 1970s and 1980s, as the "dirty man" of Europe.

Britain’s poor ranking is partly explained by its large population (61 million) and congestion.

But also to blame is the fact that Britain has been doing less to reduce vehicle emissions than other Euopean countries.


UK tops league for toxic traffic fumes

We have the worst road pollution in Europe


Steven Swinford
The Sunday Times
March 1, 2009




BRITAIN suffers from the most widespread levels of dangerous traffic fumes in Europe, posing a serious risk to health, according to a government report.

Hundreds of local authorities breach European Union limits for nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which has been linked to asthma, stunted lung growth in children and premature death. The fumes on certain stretches of roads breach safety levels in 95% of cities and regions in the UK, compared with 82% in Austria, 52% in Germany and 21% in France.

The report from the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) warns that Britain will breach EU air pollution laws and face swingeing fines unless it takes radical measures such as introducing subsidies for electric cars or a national road pricing scheme. It raises the spectre of Britain reverting to its past status as the “dirty man” of Europe as economic pressures lead to cuts in environmental standards.

Last month Boris Johnson, the mayor of London, dropped a pledge to force vans and mini-buses to abide by the standards of London’s low emission zone. Johnson suspended the scheme, which would have helped to reduce NO2 emissions to safe levels, within the EU target, on the grounds that the burden on small businesses would have been too great.

Simon Birkett, head of the Campaign for Clean Air in London, said: “The mayor and the government are in total denial about the sheer scale of this problem and the public health risk. These emissions are killing people. There is a fundamental lack of will and courage at the very top.”

Britain’s poor ranking is partly explained by its high population and congestion.

Other European countries have, however, been more successful at reducing emissions.

Germany, for example, has introduced 36 low emission zones in which older petrol and diesel cars are banned. The Netherlands has introduced 18, and Italy six. The UK has just one.

Frank Kelly, professor of environmental health at King’s College London, said: “Instead of taking the hard decisions and doing more, we’re doing less.”

Ken Livingstone, the former mayor of London, said: “The health risks are stark; air pollution is killing people.”

The documents reveal that the UK will miss its EU deadline to cut nitrogen dioxide emissions to safe levels by 2010.

By next year, 2,188 miles of Britain’s main roads will exceed EU limits. London will have dangerous levels of emissions on 698 miles of roads, compared with 129 miles in Greater Manchester, 116 miles in the West Midlands and 48 miles in West Yorkshire.

Bath in Somerset, Lewes in East Sussex, Cambridge, Canterbury in Kent, Weymouth in Dorset and Salisbury in Wiltshire also have dangerous levels of the fumes.

Ministers will apply for an extension to 2015, but officials are doubtful even the new deadline will be met and Britain faces large fines.

Official research shows that sooty particulate matter, a pol-, lutant closely linked with NO2 results in 12,000 to 24,000 premature deaths a year. In 2007 scientists at the University of Southern California found that children who live within 500 yards of a main road have stunted lung development.

Penny Green, a 37-year-old mother of two, and her husband, Jason, both suffer from asthma and although they live in Lewes, a market town, they avoid taking their children, aged five and nine, walking in the town centre.

Five roads in Lewes exceed EU limits for annual average nitrogen dioxide emissions and Green said she would not risk her children’s lungs. “It only takes one road to be shut down for the whole road to get grid-locked, ” she said.

timesonline.co.uk
 

mark_jm

New Member
Mar 2, 2009
1
0
1
UK
I read your post about London Low emission postponement, and the link this may have to NO2.

In fact un wittingly Boris has probably saved London from an increase in NO2 by postponing the next phase.
Most of the technologies that would have been used in this phase would have been open systems using heavy Platinum coatings. Such systems do actually increase NO2 by as much as 5 times, but at the same time create an equal and opposited decrease in NO. They convert NO to NO2 as a means to create the catalytic reaction .

I say most technologies becasue the big players in the market are really sold on platinum coatings. Some companies such as Clean Diesel Technologies (Clean Diesel Technologies, Inc. - The Cleantech Emissions Reduction Company), however promote technologies that use a different technology. They are more efficient in inner city and do not effect NO2 at all. Its disapointing that Boris and his advisors always seem to completley miss this fact.


Boris, in doing this however, has missed a big opportunity to reduce Particulate matter which really is bad nesws for the health of Lodoners