The New York Times (quietly) drops the F bomb

Locutus

Adorable Deplorable
Jun 18, 2007
32,230
47
48
66
'bout Time.


At a time when a (satirical) kids’ book can be titled “Go the F u c k to Sleep,” the New York Times has always held the line against profanity, sometimes to the point of absurdity. A year ago, Mary Elizabeth Williams wrote for Salon about the exaggerated contortions editors have gone through to avoid the F bomb alone, an especially tricky maneuver when the word appears in the title of a blog a journalist needs to refer to or a play or band being reviewed.


The Times’ senior standards editor, Greg Brock, told the pseudonymous B, creator of a blog called STFU, Parents, that it would not include the name of her blog in a story, even when quoting it, for the sake of “younger readers — or for any readers who might be offended. … we feel some obligation to try to maintain the Times as a respectable publication and respect all of our readers.” That’s why any reference to the word “f u c k” has been avoided or obscured by asterisks.

The New York Times (quietly) drops the F bomb - Salon.com
 

SLM

The Velvet Hammer
Mar 5, 2011
29,151
3
36
London, Ontario
If an F-bomb falls quietly in the big apple, do New Yorkers actually care? You know because they are so well known for their timid, shy demeanours.
 

IdRatherBeSkiing

Satelitte Radio Addict
May 28, 2007
15,246
2,878
113
Toronto, ON
First question, does anybody read print newspapers anymore?

Second question, how did a print newspaper get to be light years ahead of Canadian Content with regards to swearing?
 

WLDB

Senate Member
Jun 24, 2011
6,182
0
36
Ottawa
First question, does anybody read print newspapers anymore?

Second question, how did a print newspaper get to be light years ahead of Canadian Content with regards to swearing?

They have been cutting down on the number of copies they print fairly steadily over the last couple years. They still manage to make a fair bit of money by charging for online articles. Many thought people wouldnt go for it but they did. Or at least enough of them have to prevent the paper from going under.

As for profanity - good. I don't like it when people over use it but that isnt enough of a reason to stop people from saying it or stop people from printing it. They are just words.
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
First question, does anybody read print newspapers anymore?

Second question, how did a print newspaper get to be light years ahead of Canadian Content with regards to swearing?

We have a free newspaper delivered. It is mainly a vehicle to carry flyers. For some reason, on Thursday, we get about four or five pounds of flyers. Talk about a waste of paper. For all the actual "news" we get, about four pages, it is hardly worth the effort. Classified want adds and advertising......That's about it. If anyone is wondering why we get the damn thing, so are we. ...We've been trying to stop it for about three weeks now.