Stonehenge rocks may have been there before humans existed

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,222
1,776
113
Stonehenge is one of Britain's greatest mysteries, but one scientist thinks he's cracked the secrets to its existence.

Mike Pitts has mustered up an explanation as to why Stonehenge is where it is, and reckons the rocks were already there – millions of years before humans arrived...


ROCK ON Stonehenge rocks were in place ‘millions of years before people arrived’, says expert

The mysterious Stonehenge rocks may have naturally occurred on Salisbury Plain, explaining why the monument's seemingly random location was chosen

By Sean Keach, Digital Technology and Science Editor
9th April 2018
The Sun

STONEHENGE is one of Britain's greatest mysteries, but one scientist thinks he's cracked the secrets to its existence.

Mike Pitts has mustered up an explanation as to why Stonehenge is where it is, and reckons the rocks were already there – millions of years "before humans arrived".

Stonehenge is situated on Salisbury Plain in Wiltshire

One of the biggest questions around Stonehenge is why the rocks were dragged miles across the English countryside to a seemingly random spot on the Salisbury Plain.

It's made especially surprising given that most scientists agree the monument of standing rocks – or sarsens – was assembled by Neolithic people who would've found it difficult to shift the gargantuan boulders.

According to Mike, two of the biggest (and most important) sarsens were there "millions of years before people arrived".

His theory, which was published in British Archaeology, suggests that the rocks' alignment with the solstice sun was merely a coincidence.

The mysterious monument has become a British cultural icon, and is protected by law

It was this accidental alignment that got the boulders noticed by early Brits, who then decided to build it up into a proper monument.

The largest sarsen as Stonehenge is the heel stone, which weighs around 60 tonnes and sits 75 metres away from the centre of the circle.

Back in the '70s, Mike discovered a six-metre-wide hole next to the heel stone.

This now-filled pit was too large to be a "socket" for one of the standing stones, but could have been the site for a huge boulder.

It was originally believed that these sandstone sarsens didn't occur naturally on the Salisbury Plain, but that's since been proved wrong.



So it's entirely possible that key Stonehenge sarsens already existed at the site, rather than it being randomly selected as a place to build a monument.

"The assumption used to be that all the sarsens at Stonehenge had come from the Marlborough Downs more than 20 miles away," Mike told The Times.

"The idea has since been growing that some may be local and the heel stone came out of that big pit.

"If you are going to move something that large you would dress it before you move it, to get rid of some of the bulk.

"That suggests it has not been moved very far.

"It makes sense that the heel stone has always been more or less where it is now, half-buried."


Archaeologists say that Stonehenge was constructed somewhere between 3000 and 2000 BC

There's also another unexplained pit (similar to the one near the heel stone) beside the centre of the Stonehenge circle.

Mike says it's "likely" that this also held a natural sarsen boulder.

"It's possible that at the end of the ice age we had two really large visible sarsen boulders, probably the two largest on Salisbury Plain, close together on the midsummer sunrise-midwinter sunset axis."

He says that this boulder may have been used to create sarsen number 16 – a stone notable for its odd appearance.

"What distinguishes it is its very strange shape," Mike explained.

"If you were bringing the stones from the Marlborough Downs it doesn't look like a shape you would have selected.

"It tapers and narrows to a really small top."

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/6006517/stonehenge-location-mystery-salisbury-wiltshire-why/
 
Last edited:

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
I've read this article before. It sure is misleading. It shows photos of the upright lintels, etc with the caption that maybe the glaciers put them there, etc. They are actually referring to a stone (heel stone) that is hundreds of feet away from the circle and there is no photo of it or a diagram to show just how far away it is ... and it's a long way away, so far away that you have to stretch your imagination a bit to even include it in the henge. One single stone within the circle may be naturally occurring ... only one.

Crappy reportage. More sensational journalism from you-know-where.
 

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
49,222
1,776
113
I've read this article before. It sure is misleading. It shows photos of the upright lintels, etc with the caption that maybe the glaciers put them there, etc. They are actually referring to a stone (heel stone) that is hundreds of feet away from the circle and there is no photo of it or a diagram to show just how far away it is ... and it's a long way away, so far away that you have to stretch your imagination a bit to even include it in the henge. One single stone within the circle may be naturally occurring ... only one.

Crappy reportage. More sensational journalism from you-know-where.

Slightly misleading headline, but the heel stone is still part of the Stonehenge complex, as is the Avenue leading up to it. It stands 256 feet to the northeast of the circles next to the A303 road. Unlike the stones of the inner monument, the heel stone appears to be unworked and the top of the stone is naturally pointed.





At summer solstice an observer standing within the stone circle, looking northeast through the entrance, would see the Sun rise in the approximate direction of the heel stone, and the sun has often been photographed over it.

According to a local folk tale:

The Devil bought the stones from a woman in Ireland, wrapped them up, and brought them to Salisbury Plain. One of the stones fell into the Avon, the rest were carried to the plain. The Devil then cried out, "No-one will ever find out how these stones came here!" A friar replied, "That’s what you think!", whereupon the Devil threw one of the stones at him and struck him on the heel. The stone stuck in the ground and is still there. Brewer's Dictionary of Phrase and Fable attributes this tale to Geoffrey of Monmouth, but though book eight of Geoffrey's Historia Regum Britanniae does describe how Stonehenge was built, the two stories are entirely different.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonehenge