Geez, I said to each his own.No, i think your ****ogy is taking a small 'huh, isn't that funny', and blowing it completely out of proportion.
I'm not blowing anything out of proportions, I just disagree and showed why.
Geez, I said to each his own.No, i think your ****ogy is taking a small 'huh, isn't that funny', and blowing it completely out of proportion.
Yep, and it's still funny that people like to idolize statues.It could, but there it is in New York, in all her patina'd glory.
But then to me, the idea that some Americans think that France has betrayed the USA is just as irrelevant. lolNo, but that's irrelevant.
Meh, I think the message she sends is the better part of what's important.Yep, and it's still funny that people like to idolize statues.
That's fine, but it's still just a small part of how different the two nations are today, compared to 1886.But then to me, the idea that some Americans think that France has betrayed the USA is just as irrelevant. lol
I actually agree to a certain extent.
Isn't the message always more important than the messenger? lol That's why I think that it's funny how much importance people put on the statue. Makes me wonder just how many Americans actually know what the tablet there says or even the name of the poet that wroteMeh, I think the message she sends is the better part of what's important.
Indicating its irrelevance. Thanks.That's fine, but it's still just a small part of how different the two nations are today, compared to 1886.
Unless it's infrastructure.Isn't the message always more important than the messenger?
Not really. You seem to be missing the big picture.Indicating its irrelevance.
If the message is infrastructure then it isn't important and the messenger is more important? What?Unless it's infrastructure.
Not really. I'm just playing.Not really. You seem to be missing the big picture.