Well, in some respects your right. But in fairness the people who should be fixing that aren't the courts but the congress and senate. If you want it in the constitution to clarify what is and isn't protected, do an amendment and make it clear. The challenge is that some people don't want that kind of clarity (or at least unless the 'clarity' leans in their favour) so it's not being addressed that way. But it really should.
Roe v. Wade overturned?
- Thread starter Serryah
- Start date
Tell us all about your experience .
I might be interested in trying an 18 yr old, but I haven’t been able to make anyone pregnant for over 20 years.
I thought about asking, but I quickly decided I really don't want to know.
Be careful, You know the old saying. . . "Fifteen'll get ya twenty."
18 is legal age. Sides, I have already done 20 a couple of times. Actually 22 the first time and 23 so far on this sentence. Which reminds me of something a bud that worked in the jails told me. The only people in jail that serve a full 20 years are the employees.
So far they all can run faster than me. Since both knees are shot about the only thing I can catch is 70 year old with a walker.
'Chilling effect on free speech': Idaho universities disallow abortion, contraception referral
Idaho universities are warning staffers not to refer students to abortion providers, and at least one public university is barring employees from telling students how to obtain emergency contraception or
Explain again how the new 'laws' aren't extreme?
Explain how they are? Universities shoulnd't be giving medical advice in the first place, if you want to be referred go to a doctor. Or any other private care service. Universities are also not allowed to council students on where to buy illegal drugs, is that an impingement on free speech too?'Chilling effect on free speech': Idaho universities disallow abortion, contraception referral
Idaho universities are warning staffers not to refer students to abortion providers, and at least one public university is barring employees from telling students how to obtain emergency contraception orwww.idahostatejournal.com
Explain again how the new 'laws' aren't extreme?
Also - why does the left get SOOOO worked up about 'free speech' the moment it affects something they care about and the rest of the time it's "Well your speech has consequences". Spare me the crocodile tears. Start standing up for other's free speech if you want anyone to care when you feel yours is threatened.
You finally noticed. That is how woke universities are. Teachers, and even tenured professors get fired for not being woke enough.'Chilling effect on free speech': Idaho universities disallow abortion, contraception referral
Idaho universities are warning staffers not to refer students to abortion providers, and at least one public university is barring employees from telling students how to obtain emergency contraception or
Explain again how the new 'laws' aren't extreme?
Yeash Taxslave2 - you broke Serryah again
You KNOW you've sent her into an emotional crisis when she puts her little 
symbol on the post
Well, this is going to be interesting.
www.kcur.org
A Missouri hospital is the first under federal investigation for denying an emergency abortion
A Joplin hospital is apparently the first in the nation to be investigated for possibly violating federal law by telling a woman experiencing an emergency that she needed to terminate her pregnancy to protect her health, but that the abortion could not take place in Missouri.
www.kcur.org
Not even a little bit interesting. She wasn't having an 'emergecy' as envisioned by the regulation - a fact proven by the fact she had time to source another location and go have it done there. This is politicking before the midterms and that's it. It's boring. The dems are just desperate to kick up a wedge issue. Hell it wasn't even the woman who complained.
If you ask me it kind of highlights the stupidity of a total ban like that but i thought that before this incident so there's really nothing new.
Sorry sweetie - this is a nothingburger.
That's not possible. You see - once the left is the only ones left, half of the left will decide that the other half isn't left enough. And that makes them right wing. They will then turn on that group (who would have SWORN they were left) until they are destroyed.
The process repeats until eventually the population is down to two people glaring at each other while holding sharpened protest signs enraged at each other's position on bell bottom pants, until they eventually give up and agree to couple's therapy.
Basically we're talking about the end of the human race if all that's left is the left.