Campus LGBT group: Wilfrid Laurier isn’t going far enough to silence ‘climate of transphobia’
Though Wilfrid Laurier University has apologized to Lindsay Shepherd, the university’s Rainbow Centre appears to be endorsing the disciplinary action originally taken against the teaching assistant, and suggesting the school isn’t doing enough to combat “profound violence” against transgender people.
“In the face of recent media attention, we feel it is our responsibility to speak out against the climate of transphobia that is being fostered at Laurier,” reads a statement released Tuesday by the Wilfrid Laurier University Rainbow Centre, a service within the school’s diversity and equity office that offers support to queer and trans students.
"The Rainbow Centre, by contrast, accused Wilfrid Laurier University of “silence” on the issue of transphobia.
“The discourse of freedom of speech, is being used to cover over the underlying reality of transphobia that is so deeply ingrained in our contemporary political context,” reads the Rainbow Centre’s statement.
Articles and columns written in support of Shepherd, meanwhile, were said to be “defending and perpetuating transphobic beliefs and attitudes.”
The statement does not directly name Shepherd or the professors who met with her, claiming that “confidentiality” makes the Rainbow Centre “unable to comment directly.” (Shepherd had already chosen to name herself in the media.)
Nevertheless, the statement suggests that the debate of gendered pronouns is “disallowable speech” that constitutes “a form of epistemic violence that dehumanizes trans people by denying the validity of trans experience.”
The term “epistemic violence,” used in this context, roughly translates to “knowledge violence.”
Shepherd responded Tuesday with a Tweet criticizing the Rainbow Centre for equating transgender issues with silencing seminar debate.
“Why is (The Rainbow Centre) suggesting that being trans and supporting academic freedom are mutually exclusive?” she wrote.
Campus LGBT group: Wilfrid Laurier
Good question, Lindsay.............but don't hold your breath waiting for an answer considering that anything you say is now branded by the inelegantly invented term disallowable speech and could well lead to epistemic violence thus resulting in yet even more profound violence. Or so the Rainbow people on campus would have you and other intelligent Canadians believe.
The statement below is a perfect example of how they are more than willing to attack anyone who disagrees with their virulent dogma.
“The discourse of freedom of speech, is being used to cover over the underlying reality of transphobia that is so deeply ingrained in our contemporary political context,” reads the Rainbow Centre’s statement."
Sure it is. Some people really really really need to get a life.
Though Wilfrid Laurier University has apologized to Lindsay Shepherd, the university’s Rainbow Centre appears to be endorsing the disciplinary action originally taken against the teaching assistant, and suggesting the school isn’t doing enough to combat “profound violence” against transgender people.
“In the face of recent media attention, we feel it is our responsibility to speak out against the climate of transphobia that is being fostered at Laurier,” reads a statement released Tuesday by the Wilfrid Laurier University Rainbow Centre, a service within the school’s diversity and equity office that offers support to queer and trans students.
"The Rainbow Centre, by contrast, accused Wilfrid Laurier University of “silence” on the issue of transphobia.
“The discourse of freedom of speech, is being used to cover over the underlying reality of transphobia that is so deeply ingrained in our contemporary political context,” reads the Rainbow Centre’s statement.
Articles and columns written in support of Shepherd, meanwhile, were said to be “defending and perpetuating transphobic beliefs and attitudes.”
The statement does not directly name Shepherd or the professors who met with her, claiming that “confidentiality” makes the Rainbow Centre “unable to comment directly.” (Shepherd had already chosen to name herself in the media.)
Nevertheless, the statement suggests that the debate of gendered pronouns is “disallowable speech” that constitutes “a form of epistemic violence that dehumanizes trans people by denying the validity of trans experience.”
The term “epistemic violence,” used in this context, roughly translates to “knowledge violence.”
Shepherd responded Tuesday with a Tweet criticizing the Rainbow Centre for equating transgender issues with silencing seminar debate.
“Why is (The Rainbow Centre) suggesting that being trans and supporting academic freedom are mutually exclusive?” she wrote.
Campus LGBT group: Wilfrid Laurier
Good question, Lindsay.............but don't hold your breath waiting for an answer considering that anything you say is now branded by the inelegantly invented term disallowable speech and could well lead to epistemic violence thus resulting in yet even more profound violence. Or so the Rainbow people on campus would have you and other intelligent Canadians believe.
The statement below is a perfect example of how they are more than willing to attack anyone who disagrees with their virulent dogma.
“The discourse of freedom of speech, is being used to cover over the underlying reality of transphobia that is so deeply ingrained in our contemporary political context,” reads the Rainbow Centre’s statement."
Sure it is. Some people really really really need to get a life.