Activist in court after posting alleged mink farm abuses
Kevin Connor
More from Kevin Connor
Published:
July 5, 2018
Updated:
July 5, 2018 8:53 PM EDT
Animal rights activist Malcolm Kilmowicz, faces breaking and entering charges.
Malcolm Kilmowicz says he’ll face charges of breaking and entering if it puts the spotlight on the alleged animal rights abuses he has documented at a mink fur farm.
The activist videoed graphic images of conditions at a Durham fur farm one night in June 2017 and posted the images online.
“Most people would see what I did as in the interest of public good,” Kilmowicz said outside Oshawa court Thursday, after making his first appearance on the breaking and entering charges.
His video allegedly shows minks overcrowded in cages with babies and dead bloated carcasses. Minks are self mutilating and cannibalizing each other.
Protesters show thier support for activist Malcolm Kilmowicz outside an Oshawa courthouse (Kevin Connor, Toronto Sun)
“People are breaking the OSPCA act against cruelty to animals and the system of enforcement isn’t being upheld. It was always in the back of my head that I could get in trouble, but that didn’t matter,” he said.
There is no reason to prosecute, insisted defense lawyer Leo Salloum, who also helped defend another animal rights activist, Anita Krajnc, who was found not guilty in 2017 of mischief for giving pigs water as they were on their way to slaughter.
“(Kilmowicz) was showing courage in the face of shocking animal cruelty and the government is stepping in, in an act of censorship. It’s a major overreaction,” Salloum said, adding the prosecuters allowed the statute for trespassing charges to pass.
Kilmowicz added all he did was hop a fence and didn’t even have to open a door to document what was happening at the mink farm.
“This has generated media attention, so (the Crown is) acting in a heavy-handed fashion,” Salloum argued.
Adam Stirr — one of about was with about two dozen people protesting in support of Kilmowicz outside the courthouse — said the activists is a whistleblower.
“When a member of the public watches what he recorded, well nobody can be OK with that cruelty . Somebody had to step up,” Stirr said.
Kilmowicz will be back in court on Aug. 2. No one from the mink farm was in court Thursday.
http://torontosun.com/news/local-news/activist-faces-charges-after-posting-alleged-mink-farm-abuses
Despite 20-year animal ownership ban, mother and daughter charged with animal cruelty again
Jackie Irwin, Hanna Herald
Published:
July 5, 2018
Updated:
July 5, 2018 9:39 AM EDT
HANNA — A mother and daughter are once again at the centre of an animal cruelty case in B.C.
Karin Adams and her daughter, Catherine, who were already under a 20-year ban on owning animals from a conviction in B.C. in 2015, are facing new charges of animal cruelty from the BC SPCA.
Catherine is also due back in an Alberta court in August for sentencing after being found guilty in February on two counts of animal cruelty in Hanna.
In the latest case, the BC SPCA confirmed Wednesday that 16 dogs in distress had been seized from a property in Quesnel.
The dogs — including German shepherds, a Yorkshire terrier, a retriever, bull terriers, standard poodle, Portuguese water dogs, a Pekingese, corgi-border collie crosses and miniature poodles — were found in crates too small for their sizes and lived on feces- and urine-soaked matting.
The area they were housed in was also poorly ventilated, with the animals having little or no access to water.
“It is extremely frustrating when we deal with repeat offenders, particularly those who breach the terms of their sentencing,” Marcie Moriarty, chief prevention and enforcement officer for the BC SPCA, wrote in a news release announcing the seizures.
“However, we are now pleased that the dogs are now safe and are getting the attention and care they need.”
In 2015, the mother and daughter pleaded guilty in an animal cruelty case involving more than 100 animals, which the SPCA seized from their property in 2014.
Karin was sentenced to 15 days in jail and two years of probation at the time, while Catherine received six-month conditional house arrest and three years of probation.
On Feb. 28, 2018, Catherine was found guilty on two counts of animal cruelty while Karin was found not guilty after the Crown failed to prove that both women lived at the residence near Hanna.
Catherine, due back in court Aug. 22 for sentencing, asked at the time of the verdict if she could get the seized animals back, noting “it’s my right to try to get them back.”
Catherine faces a maximum penalty of five years in custody in Alberta.
JIrwin@postmedia.com
http://torontosun.com/news/national/offenders-charged-again-in-animal-cruelty-case