Ontario's labour picture is looking worse than the rest of the country

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
1
36
The poorest families in Ontario are earning less than they were in 2000, while during the same period richer families have watched their income grow, according to a new economic report.

The analysis by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA) describes an increasingly "polarized" Ontario labour market that is shifting away from stable manufacturing jobs to more precarious service sector work and rewarding higher-earning families while punishing poorer ones.

"Really there are two different labour markets in Ontario," the report's author and CCPA senior economist Sheila Block said in an interview.

The new report, titled Losing Ground, analyzed income data for families with children between 2000 and 2015. During that time, higher earning families increased their share of the income pie.

The top half of Ontario families in terms of income now takes home 81 per cent of all earnings, up from 78 per cent in 2000.
"It's a totally different story for families in the bottom half," Block said.

The poorest half of Ontario families' share of earnings shrunk from 22 per cent in 2000 to 19 per cent in 2015.

Ontario's labour picture is looking worse than the rest of the country in terms of income inequality. At the national level, the report says average earnings grew consistently for 90 per cent of families between 2000 and 2015, due in part to the natural resource boom enjoyed in other provinces.

The report says the income inequality is being caused by a "seismic shift" taking place in Ontario's labour market with the decline of stable, working-class jobs in the manufacturing sector.

Government assistance helps prop up poorer families, but the CCPA says labour laws need to be changed to reflect the change in the market and "level the playing field."

"Governments can't do all the heavy lifting," Block said.

The report praises the provincial Liberal government's plan to increase Ontario's minimum wage to $15 an hour, but calls for "more aggressive" labour reform aimed at employers.

Block says new regulations around shift scheduling and advance notice are needed to help part-time workers, whose pay, she says, should be equalized with permanent employees.

New laws are needed to make it easier for people in the service sector to unionize, Block says.

At six per cent, the accommodation and food sector has the lowest unionization rate of any employment sector.

However, the "aggressive" modernization of labour laws the CCPA is calling for is bound to be met with opposition, something that is already happening with the government's plan to raise the minimum wage.

On Monday, a newly released study suggested that the government's plan could cost businesses up to $23 billion and put 185,000 jobs at risk.

The study was commissioned by the Keep Ontario Working Coalition, which includes the Ontario Chamber of Commerce and the Retail Council of Canada.

"Fifteen dollars an hour is only good if you have a job," Karl Baldauf, vice president of policy and government relations at the Ontario Chamber of Commerce, said in an interview.

Baldauf says the wage hike and other labour reforms proposed by the government will cause a financial hit to Ontario businesses equal to what they experienced during 2008 recession, and some of those costs will result in higher prices for consumers.

However, Block says the consequences felt by businesses don't outweigh the benefits to low-wage workers.

"We have 20 years of economic research and analysis that says increases in minimum wages have positive impacts on poverty, positive impacts on inequality and don't result in falling employment," Block said.

Poor Ontario families getting poorer: new report - Toronto - CBC News
 

Walter

Hall of Fame Member
Jan 28, 2007
34,888
126
63
More regulation and more gubmint is always the left's answer to everything.
 

mentalfloss

Prickly Curmudgeon Smiter
Jun 28, 2010
39,817
471
83
Agreed 100%.

NAFTA has destroyed Canada's manufacturing........


You mean that right wing, free trade agreement that conservatives used to champion that has now become synonymous with satan because those same conservatives became Trumptards and promote protectionism now?

That NAFTA?
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
More regulation and more gubmint is always the left's answer to everything.

Yep, Mrs. Reddenbacher's policies are doing wonders fro low income earners and especially the mfg sector

You mean that right wing, free trade agreement that conservatives used to champion that has now become synonymous with satan because those same conservatives became Trumptards and promote protectionism now?

That NAFTA?

kinda makes you wonder why tater tot didn't promote Trump's desire to tear-up that agreement instead of offering to lick his nuts and beg him to keep it, eh?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
"The poorest families in Ontario are earning less than they were in 2000, while during the same period richer families have watched their income grow, according to a new economic report."
The rest of the world has been following that formula since coal and iron ore were discovered.
With the biggest population why shouldn't they take the biggest hit. The energy crashes in AB since 1980 should have been a living example that the good times can vanish at the snap of the fingers or the real leaders. What we pay for with out tax dollars are commonly called 'bitches'. The quicker you accept that the quicker your stress level goes down. You can actually laugh after that point in time. A lot of people never really laugh before they die. Fuk em, life is for the living anyway. All the secrets were to stop them from being shown to be complete shitheads. The details of what is said behind closed doors doesn't even matter, the fact there are closed doors is the important part.

kinda makes you wonder why tater tot didn't promote Trump's desire to tear-up that agreement instead of offering to lick his nuts and beg him to keep it, eh?
You spelled Rothschild wrong. Thought you should know that.