Mum's anger after baby's spiky hair leads to passport rejection

Blackleaf

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 9, 2004
50,357
1,975
113
Mum's anger after baby's spiky hair leads to passport rejection

By JAYA NARAIN

20th March 2007

When you are only four months old you can be forgiven the odd bad hair day.

But apparently not if you are having a passport photograph taken.

Kate Lurie thought the photographic assistant was joking when he pointed to her daughter Eden's three-inch hair in the portrait and said: "It's too spiky."




Wrong: Eden Lurie, four months, with her natural ‘Mohican’ hairstyle. Right (below): Eden with her computerised haircut





She was even more amazed when the child was given a 'virtual haircut' on a computer to trim her flyaway hair.

Eden had fallen foul of the strict regulations brought in by the Identity and Passport Service for the new biometric passports.

Thousands of pictures have been rejected by the service because they do not meet the guidelines.

The tough criteria demand that hair and eyes are clearly defined in the pictures and that the face makes up at least 65 per cent of the photo.

Unfortunately, Eden's vertical hairstyle meant a large proportion of the photo was taken up by her Mohican-style locks.

Mother-of-two Mrs Lurie, 33, said: "When I was told Eden's hair was too long, I just couldn't believe it.

"I know passport photos have to be a certain size, but this is ridiculous."

Changes may be made to photos on computers to meet the regulations but no alterations to the face are permitted.

Mrs Lurie, a court clerk, took Eden to get her first passport photo taken at Prestwich Pharmacy in Manchester.

Margaret Matwiejew, photo team leader at the shop, said: "The Passport Office has gone over the top with its requirements.

"Too many people have their photos rejected because they don't measure up. We have people coming in who have been to photo booths many times and have still not managed to get what they want, so we fit their faces into a frame on the computer.

"We do not alter the face in any way, but the rules say the whole head has to be in the photo and 65 to 75 per cent of the photo has to be the face."

An Identity and Passport Service spokesman said the criteria for photos were deliberately strict to help security and fight fraud and forgery.

He added: "We appreciate how difficult it is to get good pictures of children, so we allow under- fives to have their mouth open and their eyes facing away from the camera."

dailymail.co.uk
 

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
47
Newfoundland!
I just had my photos for my permanant resident card rejected. No explanation as to WHY they were rejected. I paid good money for those photos, and if i can't tell them why it wasnt any good then I can't be sure to get it right next time.
 

westmanguy

Council Member
Feb 3, 2007
1,651
18
38
I had to get a passport photo.

They are strict. For some reason you CANNOT smile!!!

Strange requirements if you ask me!
 

TenPenny

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 9, 2004
17,467
139
63
Location, Location
I had to get a passport photo.

They are strict. For some reason you CANNOT smile!!!

Strange requirements if you ask me!

Because it's unlikely that you'll be smiling when the border guards are harassing you, and they want the picture to match so you're easier to identify.
 

jjaycee98

Electoral Member
Jan 27, 2006
421
4
18
British Columbia
I had to get a passport photo.

They are strict. For some reason you CANNOT smile!!!

Strange requirements if you ask me!


Yes they are strict! The image itself has to be a certain size. It cannot be larger to accommodate any kind of huge backcombed hairdo, spiked, or top knotted. The face in the photo has to be a certain size, has to be black and white and pan faced. There are people who do Passport Photos for a reason, and may charge more for that reason-they get it right.:-?
 

hermanntrude

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Jun 23, 2006
7,267
118
63
47
Newfoundland!
they don't always get it right. i've run into it twice now. the problem is when they get it wrong, the people who reject it won't tell you what was wrong, so the person who got it wrong never gets to know what they did wrong so the problem is perpetuated
 

Dezzarai

New Member
Mar 16, 2007
30
0
6
I think that's ridiculous. so what, the baby's hair stood up. do they really think that that baby is a terrorist? maybe the mother should just have flattened it a bit with some water or something, but it's a BABY! they should make exceptions for babies. they already said that they can have their mouth open and look away from camera, but their hair can't be too high?maybe it would be ok to do that to an adult or even an older kid, but that girl was 4 months old! and why didn't they just make the picture lower so that it didn't show her shirt but could fit her hair into the picture?