Irrelevant. Still can't debate eh?LOL...I know...I know...context!!
OK fair enough, let me know when you have something to support your position, other then your imagination.
Irrelevant. Still can't debate eh?LOL...I know...I know...context!!
I've proven that your opinion is based on fantasy, you aren't logically consistent, you're prone to demanding evidence from others when you offer none, that you and Joey are more alike then any other member on this board, that you can't debate, that when that becomes apparent you lower the conversation to childish innuendo, false accusations, and out right BS.
Did I miss anything?
OK fair enough, let me know when you have something to support your position, other then your imagination.
I'm not wasting my time, you didn't understand it the first time. Proving it all over again, won't make you understand iy any better and it certainly won't change the fact that your inadequate education on the subject has been exposed.I'm not sure. I missed all of it. Would you be a dear and point it out for me?
Ya, that says it all. To bad you don't live in a democracy, nor do you actually believe in it.Democracy
You use your own personal definitions and disregard what is accepted, both Internationally and Federally.
Run along Gerry, this conversation is obviously over your head. Anybody with an IQ above the average twig should know that I'm not using my own definitions. On the contrary, the crux of my position is that there is no clear definition of what a "nation" is. That is why Harper can call Kweebeck a nation...it could mean anything and I'm pretty sure Gilles Duceppe's opinion Gary Doer's opinion and CB's opinion as to what that means are not the same thing.
The only one whose head this is well over, is yours.Run along Gerry, this conversation is obviously over your head.
Well that certainly excludes you.Anybody with an IQ above the average twig...
Yes you are, as you have been priviously proven wrong, there is a clear, globally accepted definition of Nation....should know that I'm not using my own definitions.
Again, your opinion on that matter is proven erroneous, by the fact that there is a globally accepted definition.On the contrary, the crux of my position is that there is no clear definition of what a "nation" is.
If we're all reading the same dictionary, and reading the same legal findings by the SCC and UN, we likely agree.That is why Harper can call Kweebeck a nation...it could mean anything and I'm pretty sure Gilles Duceppe's opinion Gary Doer's opinion and CB's opinion as to what that means are not the same thing.
I think calling him a troll, is giving him far to much credit.Doesn't matter what Harper says. What matters is what International law and federal law, as in the SCC, says. Personal opinion means nothing. Duceppe, Harper, Doer, you, can say whatever the fu ck ya's want. If it's not supported by law it means sweet pi ss all. You know that and I know that. You're continued use of BS definitions just reinforces my personal definition of you being a troll. Someone that is looking for a reaction rather than a discussion.
I think calling him a troll, is giving him far to much credit.
Only the completely stupid could be as childish as Cannuck is being.
Still can't figure out how to support your position?Of course it doesn't. LOL