Interesting. And what would you say to the liberals that dislike Moore? There are plenty of them, including Al Franken. Many liberals don't like Moore because they think he is a bad representative for their ideology.Reverend Blair said:So not only is the radical right too lazy to make up their own titles, but they're too stupid to match the title to the person?
I'm sure this will be another non-factual hack-job by a bunch of bozos who spent the budget on hookers. The radical right, at their absolute best, is derivative and too lazy to dig for real facts.
It is a book title.no1important said:What a looney title for this section. It reeks of flamingness. You know Warhawk you remind me of another troll that used to post here.
I'd hardly call them documentaries, as they are heavily doctored to fit a political ideology.BTW- Michael Mooore is not stupid. He has done many great documentries.
Where is the truth in his movies/books etc? His alterations of facts, and rewritten history is well documented all over the internet. Check out spinsanity.comRoger and Me and Bowling for Colombine were excellent as was Fahrenheit 911. It is just some people do not like the truth.
First, Michael Moore has been sued a number of times for things he has said and done in his movies and on TV. Second, winning an award does not make you intelligent, or the things you say true.If he is stupid why has no one sued him for slander and why did F911 win best picture at Cannes? Bowling for Columbine won an Oscar for best documentry.
All the book title is doing is throwing back what Moore himself is dishing out. It's a mockery of his "Stupid White Men" book.So to say he is a big fat stupid white man, just shows your lack of intelligance.![]()