Dory man I couldn't agree more. These sickos cannot be cured, most of them don't want to be. Castration and medication to kill their libito would be a just punishment. I'm not kidding, rights be damned they are permanant threat to children.
Man sentenced in huge kiddie porn bust
- Thread starter Jersay
- Start date
Sassylassie said:
Well all these peacenik groups would argue for these sickos saying they have human rights, I kid you not. I think they should face the death penalty for their acts. What they do to a child is almost a death sentence as that child's life will never be the same.
The death penality is two painless for these bastards, a public flogging would be best. I don't pay attention to pacisfist, well I try not to hurt them to badly as I mow them down with the F150. I don't want them messing up the front end of the truck. Protest all you like but get out of my pucking way.
The death penalty should, in my opinion, never be exercised; cases can be appealed, new evidence can surface, and there is always a chance (notwithstanding previous court rulings) that it could be discovered that someone was wrongly convicted. A death penalty cannot be reversed.
Five, in the lastest bust a police officer stated that there were pictures of a grown men having sex with six month old baby girls. I could not shoot someone but I could claw to death someone who did the likes of that with my bare hands until he entered hell.
Re: RE: Man sentenced in huge kiddie porn bust
A Child Killer, a Child Molester, a Cop Killer deserve the Death Penalty. They can have years and years to appeal.
Well the Death Peanlty was just handed to a Child Killer in the US who raped an 11 year old, do you believe he shouldn't have had the Death Penalty given to him? What if the guy who killed the Four RCMP Officers last year didn't kill himself and gave up. Do you believe he wouldn't deserve the Death Penalty?FiveParadox said:
A Child Killer, a Child Molester, a Cop Killer deserve the Death Penalty. They can have years and years to appeal.
Children, a segment of society that we are failing and badly. There must be a solution to keeping these evil vial creatures from walking around. Find an Island (Newfoundland has brutal weather) some where and put them on it with the basics of human life no outside contact and let them build a society of sickies.
There were suggestions on another thread around here (some time ago) that perhaps an uninhabited landmass in the Canadian Arctic could be used to house some sort of long-term dangerous offenders' prison. I think, at the time, I was in favour of the idea; and I would be in favour of certain crimes having punishments that would result in a permanent (subject to appeal and overturning, of course) quarantine from mainstream society.
However, to respond to Johnny Utah, no, I would not have been an advocate of the death penalty in any of those cases — only stronger, or permanent, terms of imprisonment.
However, to respond to Johnny Utah, no, I would not have been an advocate of the death penalty in any of those cases — only stronger, or permanent, terms of imprisonment.
Because I am a twisted individual,I have a novel solution to the problem of male sexual predators. Part 1, is the surgery necessary to turn them into functional females and Part 2 entails freeing them into the general population as permanent sex toys.This is also a part solution to all the sodomy happening in our prisons :evil:
RE: Man sentenced in huge
I swear, I have never seen more emotional, biased pieces of shit then I have on this forum.
"Let's kill them, they deserve it."
And you know this because...
The two countries that have the smallest reoffending rate are France and Denmark.
France, because you throw them in a hole and when they get out never want to commit a crime again. We have nice prisons in Canada, so this will never happen.
Denmark, because they actually take the time to rehabillitate them. Something which is within our power.
HOLY SHIT, PEOPLE ARE EQUAL NOW? WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN???
Introduction to human rights 101:
Once upon a time there were a couple of people, in this little organization known as the United Nations that decided to draft something known as The Universal Decleration of Human Rights.
Article 6.
Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7.
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 10.
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Everyone seems to be so emotive on this board. You can't argue effectively if you are emotionally charged. Not to mention everything said appears to be incredibly biased. In the majority of these posts there is no evidence of reasoned thought. You are arguing with emotion. Tell me, shall we place laws on our citizens that our backed up by emotion, or shall we use logic? The law is reason free from passion. If you disagree then that's your right. You are not alone. Several other fundamentalists and terrorists agree with you.
The reason this man got 3 1/2 years was because he cooperated with the police and pleaded guilty. If he had not the Judge(s) would have ruled for a harsher sentance.
I swear, I have never seen more emotional, biased pieces of shit then I have on this forum.
"Let's kill them, they deserve it."
And you know this because...
The two countries that have the smallest reoffending rate are France and Denmark.
France, because you throw them in a hole and when they get out never want to commit a crime again. We have nice prisons in Canada, so this will never happen.
Denmark, because they actually take the time to rehabillitate them. Something which is within our power.
HOLY SHIT, PEOPLE ARE EQUAL NOW? WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN???
Introduction to human rights 101:
Once upon a time there were a couple of people, in this little organization known as the United Nations that decided to draft something known as The Universal Decleration of Human Rights.
Article 6.
Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before the law.
Article 7.
All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
Article 10.
Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and obligations and of any criminal charge against him.
Everyone seems to be so emotive on this board. You can't argue effectively if you are emotionally charged. Not to mention everything said appears to be incredibly biased. In the majority of these posts there is no evidence of reasoned thought. You are arguing with emotion. Tell me, shall we place laws on our citizens that our backed up by emotion, or shall we use logic? The law is reason free from passion. If you disagree then that's your right. You are not alone. Several other fundamentalists and terrorists agree with you.
The reason this man got 3 1/2 years was because he cooperated with the police and pleaded guilty. If he had not the Judge(s) would have ruled for a harsher sentance.
When this topic came up in Criminology it was heavly debated. We were required to write a paper on if we were pro-death penalty or anti. The basis of this paper stated that we would be the one injecting the poison. I learned that I believe in it, but I lack the moral courage to kill someone. Ergo, if I can't stick the needle in I'm anti death penalty.
Come to think of it, the Criminal Code of Canada provides a fair amount of leeway for the Courts to work with in terms of sentencing; for possession, anywhere between ninety days and five years. Thinking logically (as prompted by our fellow member, orpheos {who had some very good points, by the way}), perhaps five years is an adequate maximum sentence? It is a separate charge altogether from production of child pornography, and how is sentencing someone who possesses the pornography going to solve anything?
Ah, that is how I ended my paper. I could not give the lethal injection but I would take a life if it were in hand to hand combat. I.E. I was willing to attempt death by violence but only by my own hand.
Kreskin said:
That sounds good, but since theres no Death Penalty in Canada for sickos like this. In prison I would toss him into General Population and make sure all the inmates know who he is and what he did! Justice would be served.
3 years!!!!! this is justice in Canada???
Cmon now, I dont think the death penalty would be justified unless a life is taken, but child molesters should have to face life. Maybe parole after 15 or 20.....but they should be on parole and monitored for the rest of their natural life.
Cmon now, I dont think the death penalty would be justified unless a life is taken, but child molesters should have to face life. Maybe parole after 15 or 20.....but they should be on parole and monitored for the rest of their natural life.
Re: RE: Man sentenced in huge kiddie porn bust
yea I dont have any respect for someone who would not advocate the death penalty for a person such as this who molested and killed children. Personally I would advocate the death penalty for anyone proven guilty of 1st deg with DNA evidence against them.
To those on the far radical left.....if you advocate abortion, then I dont see how you can be against the death penalty, you killing human beings both ways
Johnny Utah said:
yea I dont have any respect for someone who would not advocate the death penalty for a person such as this who molested and killed children. Personally I would advocate the death penalty for anyone proven guilty of 1st deg with DNA evidence against them.
To those on the far radical left.....if you advocate abortion, then I dont see how you can be against the death penalty, you killing human beings both ways
RE: Man sentenced in huge
If you kill someone then you get life, not 3 and half years. This man did not kill anyone.
Incorrect. To kill, something must be alive, and if you believe in science (and it's quite possible that you don't) then you'll notice certain requirements must be met for life. There is a certain period of time where the fetus does not metabolize ( which is requirement for life). In either case, the use of "if you believe in abortion then you should also believe the death penalty should be allowed" is ridiculous. You may note that many people on the far right who advocate the death penalty are anti-choice. Another interesting thing that I've noticed on this board is that while people are quick to condem the actions of terrorists and such, they themselves succumb to the level of rash and impulsive thoughts. Such a dense concentration of hypocrisy, pity.