Life began after meteorites splashed into small ponds, McMaster University research s

spaminator

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 26, 2009
38,850
3,570
113
Life began after meteorites splashed into small ponds, McMaster University research suggests
Liam Casey, THE CANADIAN PRESS
First posted: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 03:39 PM EDT | Updated: Tuesday, October 03, 2017 03:46 PM EDT
New research from Canadian scientists suggests life on Earth began in warm little ponds after meteorites splashed into them about four billion years ago.
A McMaster University graduate student and his professor said they have run the numbers for the first time on a theory from Charles Darwin in the 1870s that suggested warm ponds were the breeding grounds for the first life forms.
Their calculations suggest meteorites bombarded the earth and delivered the building blocks of life that then bonded together to become ribonucleic acid (RNA), the basis for the genetic code.
Ben K.D. Pearce, a PhD student at McMaster, said he was having a conversation about interplanetary dust with a colleague while in Germany when inspiration struck.
“We can do a calculation here and actually find out whether interplanetary dust or meteorites could deliver enough organics — building blocks of RNA — to reach high concentrations within ponds,” he said.
On a train to Berlin, he did more calculations. Then over the course of more than a year at McMaster he crunched more numbers from previously published data from a wide variety of fields in a way that he said has never been analyzed before.
He added in more components including the effects of wet-dry cycles, ultraviolet radiation, drainage of ponds, precipitation and evaporation.
“We expanded this model so it encompassed all facets of science,” Pearce said.
The results, published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, suggest the plausibility that life began in warm ponds.
It also suggests the other theory on the beginning of life is wrong. That theory postulates the building blocks of life came about through vents in the earth’s crust at the bottom of the oceans.
“That theory has an irreconcilable problem where it can’t seem to make chains of RNA because it’s permanently in water,” Pearce said.
The wet-dry cycles — when ponds dry up and are then filled up again through precipitation — were a necessary component for allowing the creation of RNA polymers, basically long chains of RNA molecules bonded together.
The results expand on work done in the 1990s by Carl Sagan that showed interplanetary dust and meteorites were a crucial component of providing the genetic building blocks forming life on earth.
The work by the McMaster researchers, along with their collaborators at the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Germany, theorizes what happens after that point.
“Nobody’s put this together and tried to build a theory that’s truly interdisciplinary,” said Ralph Pudritz, Pearce’s professor at McMaster. “This is tremendously exciting!”
Pudritz and Pearce are excited to test their theory next summer when McMaster opens an origins-of-life laboratory.
Life began after meteorites splashed into small ponds, McMaster University resea
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
If it is work based on Carl Sagan it is flawed from the start. You know, the guy who didn't believe in God but had NASA send out probes looking for what could only be called 'Angels'.

The article is physically wrong. Ponds that form and dry up until rain replenishes them are called fields today. The earth was a molten ball of magma about 4BYA and the cooling process would have seen rain (or mist) at the highest elevations and seas are at the lowest elevations. Mold is a life that lives on land, mold and plants were the first life-form in a CO2 rich atmosphere. Those plants are what created the O2 that we have today, ponds and the water based life only started about 40M years ago as that is when the lowest places were cool enough that water didn't evaporate as soon as the rain landed on it.

Nice to see they are trying to correct some things like rain falling instead of icy comets being able to survive long enough to reach a molten earth whose radiated heat would melt any ice long before it could make it to the surface. When that dis happen all the water we have in the oceans fell in a short period of time and it ended up falling as snow due to it being several 100deg C below zero.
The snowball earth theory seems pretty solid and the snow would have covered any plants and the mountain tops would again be the place where life started as the seeds from the plants would have survived. The last ice to go would have been on the areas that oceans now occupy and the heat from the core would have had it as being about the same as you find around the black smoker that are active today.
I don't agree with every point but the general theory is quite possible.
[youtube]Cm_aDTcxAas[/youtube]
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
8
36
How about " Life was carried to Earth on meteorites from somewhere else in space" as the steps between inorganic matter and living creatures is not observable anywhere on this planet ... and we would see it happening around us in the natural environment. We see granite, we see living things. We don't see the transitional steps, at all. Perhaps, out in space in gas clouds and nebula, the physics and chemistry to produce living things from the inanimate and inorganic exists but not here on Terra.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
I'm assuming you will agree that you need plants before you have plant eaters. How old are the oldest plant fossils compared to animal fossils?