Kinder Morgan Pipeline

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,031
6,152
113
Twin Moose Creek
What about the people in the fishery whose livelihoods and inheritance is being threatened .

Why no voice for them?

Didn't we do this song and dance once before and I posted the article that said that their concerns with the higher volumes and tanker traffic were addressed. They are no more effected now than they were before just the volumes changed.
 

captain morgan

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 28, 2009
28,429
148
63
A Mouse Once Bit My Sister
Didn't we do this song and dance once before and I posted the article that said that their concerns with the higher volumes and tanker traffic were addressed. They are no more effected now than they were before just the volumes changed.

The BC fisheries are already hugely contaminated by the millions of liters of raw sewage released into the ocean each and every day in BC.

Bullshit. It's the exposed mineral deposits and Meadow Lake Tribal Council in Saskatchewan logging and building logging roads in the watershed that are the source.

Gaia.

It's a proven fact that clear cutting the forests like they do in BC is extra gooder more betterness for Gaia.

Fact
 

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
59,584
9,177
113
Washington DC
What about the people in the fishery whose livelihoods and inheritance is being threatened .

Why no voice for them?

Well, they had Stan Rogers, but he died.

It's a proven fact that clear cutting the forests like they do in BC is extra gooder more betterness for Gaia.

Fact

Think of it as shaving Gaia's p*ssy. Makes her all sexy an' stuff.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Didn't we do this song and dance once before and I posted the article that said that their concerns with the higher volumes and tanker traffic were addressed. They are no more effected now than they were before just the volumes changed.
I will acknowledge that you have told any number of lies
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
Here’s what you don’t know about Kinder Morgan



For example, the only evidence from KM about whether bitumen and diluent (dilbit) could be cleaned up in the marine environment came from a one-time only, non-published, non-peer reviewed experiment over a 10-day period in Gainford, Alberta. The tests were done in tanks of various seizes using fresh water with salt stirred in. According to Kinder Morgan’s evidence, the five-gallon pail and fish tank research went awry:
“Errors occurred in the fish tank, because the spill was installed in a manner that resulted in a large amount of dispersion at the outset, due to air ingestion, and the resulting slick was larger than the ruler and developed an asymmetric form.” They concluded: “A better-equipped test is certainly recommended for future consideration.” This Keystone Kops version of science was the entirety of KM’s evidence that bitumen mixed with diluent can be cleaned up.
Published studies, peer-reviewed and conducted in conditions that replicate the marine environment, demonstrate that the dilbit mixture separates and that small “oil balls” of bitumen are created, which then sink.
Canada’s premier scientific academy, the Royal Society of Canada, concluded that we lack the science to know if it is possible to clean-up dilbit. The NEB ruled that accepting the Royal Society study would be unfair to Kinder Morgan.
The NEB was unperturbed when a Kinder Morgan expert committed fraud, whiting out the word “draft” from a US EPA spill dispersion model, then introducing it to the NEB claiming it was the approach used in the US. Another intervenor, economist Robyn Allan, contacted the EPA only to discover that they did not use this model. EPA staff were shocked it was being referenced as it was clearly labeled DRAFT. Not by the time KM finished altering it.
There is no independent review making the case that Kinder Morgan’s pipeline is in the national interest
The NEB never conducted a review remotely capable of meeting the average citizen’s understanding of what is in the public interest. The largest union in the oil sands, Unifor, intervened before the NEB. Unifor attempted to enter evidence that building Kinder Morgan would cost jobs; shipping out unprocessed solid bitumen to refineries in other countries ships out Canadian jobs at the same time and increases the carbon footprint of the product. Shipping solid bitumen diluted with toxic fossil fuel condensate for export bypasses the last remaining refinery in Burnaby. The refinery cannot process bitumen. It has already cut its workforce by 30 per cent and if Kinder Morgan goes ahead, it will likely close. The NEB refused to accept the evidence. It ruled that its mandate did not include jobs, or climate, or upstream or downstream impacts.


Here
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
Indeed the "science" behind the NEB approval was enough to generate a number of resignations. I will tell you that their results - such as they are - are based on 20 hours of sunlight per day. Therefore not even applicable to the area of interest.

Oddly (or maybe not) the only politician with the background to even comment on this story is the leader of the Green Party in BC - and he is of the opinion that bitumen presents a grave danger to our waters.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
You are arguing with a guy who voted 3 months too late for the BC election last year.

Yeah, really, 3 months.

I voted on May 9th like everyone else.

That's because he's a liar. He is now attempting to change the subject. Every time he gets caught lying he does the same thing. He's in mommy's basement in the GTA somewhere, pretending to be someone else.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
Less than a third have agreements and pretty much every agreement they have contains clauses that cannot be met.

Did I mention that kinder no longer wants this project due to unforeseen expenses? No longer makes financial sense - just like energy East.

56 First Nations bands are solidly and firmly onside with the pipeline extension. Some 46 of them live in BC.


VICTORIA — The New Democrats knew from the first day in office that their election threat to do everything to “stop” the Kinder Morgan expansion was both inappropriate and unlawful.

So said Environment Minister George Heyman this week, confirming to the legislature what Premier John Horgan confided last July in naming him to cabinet.

“He was very clear that as part of transition, he had been given the legal advice that stopping the project was beyond the jurisdiction of B.C.,” said Heyman during debate on his ministry budget Monday.

“To talk about it or frame our actions around doing that, would be inappropriate and unlawful. That is why we could not do that. He advised me to not do that.”

More.............much more: Palmer: NDP tool box leaves Heyman in vice grip over Kinder Morgan | Vancouver Sun

See, I can do that and not be hit by an earthquake or a tornado, cuz I'm an Indun an' all spiritually in touch with the land an' stuff. Hey-yah-hey-yah-nah-nah-hey-yah.

:lol::lol:
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
And that is why the Indians are leading the fight to stop the pipeline. Me thinks most politicians are liars and your source is a bigger one than most. Anyway. It is the tanker traffic that is the biggest bone of contention and it is the coastal tribes that have the most to lose. Also, the Shuswap are leading the pipeline protest in the interior. If their council voted for it, the people certainly did not. I believer that most of the councils were bought off and it is the people who are going to stop this abortion.
 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
And that is why the Indians are leading the fight to stop the pipeline. Me thinks most politicians are liars and your source is a bigger one than most. Anyway. It is the tanker traffic that is the biggest bone of contention and it is the coastal tribes that have the most to lose. Also, the Shuswap are leading the pipeline protest in the interior. If their council voted for it, the people certainly did not. I believer that most of the councils were bought off and it is the people who are going to stop this abortion.

Not all the Indians, Cliffy. The ones along the pipeline have a bit more on the ball seeing as they do the many benefits to their communities. I doubt they would agree with you about being 'bought off' and would more than likely be very willing to tell you exactly why they are onboard.

Our local bands are Shuswap and they are most certainly Not against the pipeline.
 

Hoid

Hall of Fame Member
Oct 15, 2017
20,408
4
36
56 First Nations bands are solidly and firmly onside with the pipeline extension. Some 46 of them live in BC.


VICTORIA — The New Democrats knew from the first day in office that their election threat to do everything to “stop” the Kinder Morgan expansion was both inappropriate and unlawful.

So said Environment Minister George Heyman this week, confirming to the legislature what Premier John Horgan confided last July in naming him to cabinet.

“He was very clear that as part of transition, he had been given the legal advice that stopping the project was beyond the jurisdiction of B.C.,” said Heyman during debate on his ministry budget Monday.

“To talk about it or frame our actions around doing that, would be inappropriate and unlawful. That is why we could not do that. He advised me to not do that.”

More.............much more: Palmer: NDP tool box leaves Heyman in vice grip over Kinder Morgan | Vancouver Sun



:lol::lol:
First its all of them then it 40 of them now its 56 of them.


First Nations are in the forefront of the opposition to this monumentally stupid project - while you hide out on the internet spreading fake news.

 

Mowich

Hall of Fame Member
Dec 25, 2005
16,649
998
113
76
Eagle Creek
First its all of them then it 40 of them now its 56 of them.


First Nations are in the forefront of the opposition to this monumentally stupid project - while you hide out on the internet spreading fake news.


Well, they are most certainly in the forefront in this photo, the rest is questionable at best.
 

Murphy

Executive Branch Member
Apr 12, 2013
8,181
0
36
Ontario
Oh goodie, Waldi's made a picture! That's all the proof anyone needs. :lol:

If it wasn't for his lies, he'd have nothing to contribute.
 

JLM

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 27, 2008
75,301
547
113
Vernon, B.C.
Here’s what you don’t know about Kinder Morgan



For example, the only evidence from KM about whether bitumen and diluent (dilbit) could be cleaned up in the marine environment came from a one-time only, non-published, non-peer reviewed experiment over a 10-day period in Gainford, Alberta. The tests were done in tanks of various seizes using fresh water with salt stirred in. According to Kinder Morgan’s evidence, the five-gallon pail and fish tank research went awry:


]Here[/url]

I fail to understand your stance on the issue, Cliffy! You don't live within 150 miles of any part of that pipeline. Only those affected should have a say! :lol:
 

Cliffy

Standing Member
Nov 19, 2008
44,850
193
63
Nakusp, BC
I fail to understand your stance on the issue, Cliffy! You don't live within 150 miles of any part of that pipeline. Only those affected should have a say! :lol:
My stance is purely an environmental concern and this project is a colossal fukk up that will destroy land, sea and water. What we do to the Earth, we do to ourselves. And for idiots like Rummy who will say where have you been while Victoria dumps raw sewage into the ocean, I have been fighting for the environment for over 50 years and clowns like him and petroglyph have been fighting to destroy it for most of their adult lives. You can't eat or drink money and when you can no longer breath the air, we all die. Try not breathing for 5 minutes.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,340
113
Vancouver Island


Perfect image to represent the average oil patch/pipeline worker; a cheap whore who'll do anything for a dollar......or less.......

Not everyone likes to live on welfare like you. It is people like her that finance you being a burden to society.

I only have to remember back to July when WE had an election and elected a government that promised to stop this expansion.

No we didn't. We had an election in May and the non democratic parasites did not get a majority. They formed a pact with a truly evil party and forced a change of government without voter approval.
Now back to school and anoy your teachers some more.

BTW the supreme Court is currently hearing an appeal that will result in recognition in Canadian law of aboriginal primacy in all these matters which is why the deadline etc.

Canada had agreed to follow the UNDRIP and will begin amending our laws accordingly.

This is also the reason for the removal of the neb as a rubber stamping agency.

You gotta stop sniffing the glue in art class and listen to everything your teachers say, not just pick up a couple of half sentences and try to string them together to make what you think might be right. Good thing for you that tests are no longer required to get to the next grade.

What about the people in the fishery whose livelihoods and inheritance is being threatened .

Why no voice for them?

Who is stopping them from fishing?
 

Twin_Moose

Hall of Fame Member
Apr 17, 2017
22,031
6,152
113
Twin Moose Creek
And that is why the Indians are leading the fight to stop the pipeline. Me thinks most politicians are liars and your source is a bigger one than most. Anyway. It is the tanker traffic that is the biggest bone of contention and it is the coastal tribes that have the most to lose. Also, the Shuswap are leading the pipeline protest in the interior. If their council voted for it, the people certainly did not. I believer that most of the councils were bought off and it is the people who are going to stop this abortion.

Yes, anti-pipeline Vancouver really is North America’s largest exporter of coal

Lately, it’s one of the few things that oil boosters and environmental activists can agree upon: Calling Vancouver a hypocrite for opposing carbon emissions while also being the continent’s largest coal port. And both camps are correct. According to the data, Canada’s mecca of anti-pipeline sentiment does indeed rank as the largest single exporter of coal in North America.
Vancouver’s various coal facilities exported 36.8 million tonnes of coal in 2017, according to the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority. This places the B.C. city well above Norfolk, Virginia, the busiest coal port in the United States. Despite a massive spike in U.S. coal exports for 2017, only 31.5 million tonnes of coal moved out of Norfolk last year.
Vancouver’s coal exports also dwarf the total coal production for the entire country of Mexico. According to data gathered by the U.S. Congressional Research Service, Mexican mines have produced no more than 16 million tonnes of coal per year since 2006.
Much of Vancouver’s coal is handled by a single facility that ranks as the largest of its kind on the continent.
Westshore Terminals loaded 29 million tonnes of coal in 2017, nearly triple the combined coal exports of the entire U.S. West Coast.
It’s also right next to the Tsawwassen ferry terminal, making it a familiar sight to any passenger aboard a ferry arriving from Vancouver Island. Currently, Westshore Terminals is in the midst of a $275 million upgrade to “replace aging equipment and modernize our office and shop complex,” according to the company.
B.C. mines provide much of the coal flowing through Metro Vancouver. Even as coal production enters a prolonged decline around much of the world, it has been positively thriving west of the Rocky Mountains.
“Coal production is a mainstay of the province’s economy, generating billions of dollars in annual revenue and supporting thousands of well-paid jobs,” reads the website for B.C.’s Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources.
Coal is the province’s number one export commodity, with $3.32 billion of coal mined in 2016. Much of this is metallurgical coal, which is exported to Asia for the making of steel.
In recent years, however, Vancouver’s coal ports have also accommodated a massive increase in exports of thermal coal, which is used for the production of electricity.
In 2008, only 4.4 million tonnes of Vancouver’s coal exports could be called non-metallurgical. By 2017, this had more than doubled to 11.3 million tonnes.
Controversially, almost all of this thermal coal is coming from the United States. As lawmakers in Washington and Oregon have begun shutting down their own coal ports due to environmental concerns, thermal coal producers in Wyoming and Montana have simply diverted their product through Canada.
In August, then-premier Christy Clark called for a ban on Vancouver exports of U.S. thermal coal in retaliation for U.S. tariffs on Canadian softwood lumber.
“They are no longer good trading partners with Canada. So that means we’re free to ban filthy thermal coal from B.C. ports, and I hope the federal government will support us in doing that,” she said at the time.
In the main, however, Metro Vancouver has benefited handsomely from the presence of the coal industry, according to numbers compiled by the B.C.-based Coal Alliance. Between 2012 to 2017, coal-related companies spent $2.29 billion in Metro Vancouver, including $470 million in the City of Vancouver proper.
One the most visible contributions of the coal sector has been as a key sponsor of the Vancouver Aquarium. In 2012 Teck Resources donated $12.5 million to the attraction, the aquarium’s largest-ever single donation.
It’s difficult to precisely calculate the lifecycle carbon footprint of Vancouver’s coal exports, given that the city’s ports handle a variety of coal types, each with their own specific emissions profile.
But according to emissions formulas used by the Sierra Club, Vancouver’s 2017 coal exports will produce 99.8 million tonnes of CO2 over their lifetime.
For context, this is significantly higher than B.C.’s entire carbon footprint. In 2014, B.C. estimated that it produced 64.5 million tonnes of CO2 equivalent
It also means that B.C.’s existing coal exports are roughly as bad for the climate as anything scheduled to come out of the Trans Mountain expansion.
The completed Trans Mountain expansion would move 215 million extra barrels of diluted bitumen per year. Depending on the kind of Alberta bitumen the pipeline will be moving at any one time, this means that total product shipped through the expansion will emit between 129 million and 158 million tonnes of carbon dioxide over its lifecycle.