Isaac Brock: Fallen Hero

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
In the very early morning of October 13, 1812, Major General Isaac Brock was fast asleep in his bunk at Fort George, on the Niagara Frontier. About 4:00 am he was awakened by the distant thud of cannon fire. He rose in a flash, dressed, mounted his horse Alfred and dashed through the fort gate towards the sound of the guns. Brock knew that the Americans, who had declared war on Britain in June, would try to invade somewhere along the frontier. US President Thomas Jefferson said that taking Canada would be a “mere matter of marching.”
Brock rode on through the drizzling rain and pall of smoke to the hamlet of Queenston. He was annoyed that it had come to this. Earlier he had won a brilliant, and bloodless, victory over superior forces at the siege of Detroit. He wanted to rout the Americans before they had time to organize but was shackled by the timid policy of Governor George Prevost. The delay had given the Americans time to regroup and now they were on Canadian soil.
Discovering a hidden path to the top of the escarpment, the Americans were able to seize a strategic “redan,” an emplacement from which a cannon had been hampering the flow of reinforcements across the river.
Brock spurred Alfred up the incline to the heights, from where he could see the battle unfolding. He was forced by American fire to scuttle down the hillside and he took shelter at the end of town and considered what to do. For Brock, whoever controlled the heights would control Upper Canada; if it were lost, the province would be lost too.
It would have been prudent to wait for reinforcements, but Brock preferred to dare. He decided to retake the redan. Brock rallied the men from the 49th Foot Regiment and the Canadian militia. “Follow me boys,” he cried, and headed up the escarpment. On the point of collapse at the edge of the cliff, the Americans rallied and counterattacked.
Brock, brilliant in his scarlet coat and plumed hat, his buttons gleaming, must have been unmistakable. (It was a time when the image of a leader was the great Horatio Nelson, standing on deck as the battle raged around him.) A sniper stepped out from behind a bush and fired a musket ball into Brock’s chest. Samuel Jarvis rushed over to him and implored, “Are you much hurt sir”? Brock was dead.
After Brock's aide-de-camp, Lieutenant-Colonel John Macdonell, was mortally wounded in a similar vain assault, Major-General Roger Hale Sheaffe arrived from Fort George with reinforcements. His men included about 100 Six Nations warriors and several escaped slaves who had volunteered at Newark.
Sheaffe had no intention of repeating Brock’s frontal assault. In a flanking movement, he led his men around the heights and up the escarpment out of sight of the Americans. The regular soldiers and militia formed a column and began marching towards the Americans, who were now trapped between them and the cliff, while the Six Nations warriors harassed them from the flanks. In a moment reminiscent of the Plains of Abraham, the British line lowered their muskets and fired a deadly volley.
The Americans panicked but had nowhere to run. Behind them was the steep slope of the escarpment and below them the raging current of the Niagara River. Many fell or jumped, while others drowned. The rest prudently surrendered. When the smoke had cleared, almost 500 Americans were dead and another 1000 were taken prisoner. The victors suffered only 28 killed and 77 wounded - regular, militia and Six Nations.
The province was saved for the moment, but the loss of Brock was irreparable. He was a man of such energy and skill that the subsequent campaigns of the war would have been very different. The citizens of Upper Canada considered his death a public calamity. They built him a grand monument and when it was destroyed by rebels in 1832, they erected an even more magnificent one, the most splendid in the world save for Christopher Wren’s pillar marking the great London fire.
The myth of Brock, the savior of Canada, was taught to every school child. The brave Brock saving Canada was a potent image in the fledgling nation. Canada owes its independence to the failure of that invasion in 1812.
James H. Marsh is editor in chief of The Canadian Encyclopedia.

The Canadian Encyclopedia Copyright © 2007 Historica Foundation of Canada
 

m_levesque

Electoral Member
Dec 18, 2006
524
10
18
Montreal, Quebec
A great General. It is, though, a mistake for Canadians to continue to claim him as a Canadian hero. Brock was first and foremost an ENGLISH General.
 

ottawabill

Electoral Member
May 27, 2005
909
8
18
Eastern Ontario
A great General. It is, though, a mistake for Canadians to continue to claim him as a Canadian hero. Brock was first and foremost an ENGLISH General.

Weel that is the muddy murky nature of this country....Our First P.M. was from Scotland....Montcalm was a general from France not Quebec....we slowly progressed into a country so we don't have that cut off point of calling someone Canadian or British....Hell our head of state is a foriegn citizen yeesch :)
 

m_levesque

Electoral Member
Dec 18, 2006
524
10
18
Montreal, Quebec
Weel that is the muddy murky nature of this country....Our First P.M. was from Scotland....Montcalm was a general from France not Quebec....we slowly progressed into a country so we don't have that cut off point of calling someone Canadian or British....Hell our head of state is a foriegn citizen yeesch :)

Of course we have a cut-off point, 1867. Before that it is not Canadian history-that is our own arrogance that states otherwise.
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Why? Surely, if one neighbour attacks another, and in an historical context that relationship is marked overwhelmingly by respect and goodwill over the years, the least that can be expected is an apology. The US attacked us and on our own soil robbed us of this great man. It's time for them to do the right thing.
 

ottawabill

Electoral Member
May 27, 2005
909
8
18
Eastern Ontario
Why? Surely, if one neighbour attacks another, and in an historical context that relationship is marked overwhelmingly by respect and goodwill over the years, the least that can be expected is an apology. The US attacked us and on our own soil robbed us of this great man. It's time for them to do the right thing.

You'll have to read your history more closely, attacks continued from both sides of the river over a number of years. Also the U.S. was not so much fighting a neighbour as trying to rid themselves of the British system, as the British said No you don't you must stay...

as well death in war has never had an "I'm sorry" attached to it...The war itself may have but not particular deaths.
 

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
Why? Surely, if one neighbour attacks another, and in an historical context that relationship is marked overwhelmingly by respect and goodwill over the years, the least that can be expected is an apology. The US attacked us and on our own soil robbed us of this great man. It's time for them to do the right thing.


They didn't attack Canada. We did not exist as a nation at the time. You're looking at history and judging it by today's standards. The War was with England, fought here, on ENGLISH owned soil.

Apologies for deaths in war are not, as the saying goes, in the nature of war:)
 

ottawabill

Electoral Member
May 27, 2005
909
8
18
Eastern Ontario
boy o boy would all us blue eyed northern European stock have a lot of sorry's to do!!

Yep we were not a country, hardly a territory, just a place to post Britsh troups really. Some of you need to remember that before the U.S. broke away all of North America was basically one place..the New World, travel from Montreal to Boston had no check point,no passport just get on a horse. It's the reason there are some small towns on land borders that have a border running right though the middle of them (Ny/Quebec, Vermont/Quebec) they were there before the was a border
 

tamarin

House Member
Jun 12, 2006
3,197
22
38
Oshawa ON
Remember guys this wasn't 1776. I should think we can all agree the US was the aggressor in 1812. Yes, Canada was undeveloped and yes, Brock was here to protect British interests but surely 'Canada', rudimentary and ill defined, still existed then. And Brock being one of our earliest heroes, no matter his heritage or directed position, deserves our respect. And support. Will we get an apology? No. Should we ask for one? I'm cheeky enough to.
 

sanctus

The Padre
Oct 27, 2006
4,558
48
48
Ontario
www.poetrypoem.com
Remember guys this wasn't 1776. I should think we can all agree the US was the aggressor in 1812. Yes, Canada was undeveloped and yes, Brock was here to protect British interests but surely 'Canada', rudimentary and ill defined, still existed then. And Brock being one of our earliest heroes, no matter his heritage or directed position, deserves our respect. And support. Will we get an apology? No. Should we ask for one? I'm cheeky enough to.

No one is denying his greatness as a leader, however it is a serious mistake to think he performed his actions for the good of Canada. He was an English general, supporting the English crown in an English colony. He was not, therefore, a Canadian hero, he was an English hero fighting his battles in THEIR Canadian territories.
 

ottawabill

Electoral Member
May 27, 2005
909
8
18
Eastern Ontario
war is never straightforward. never Black and white, never good vs evil, but more about insults, property and power.

War of 1812 was about insult. The British would never leave the U.S. alone after independance, blockades, arrests etc...The U.S. had had enough so declared war on Britain with help from France!!!
 

Daz_Hockey

Council Member
Nov 21, 2005
1,927
7
38
I'm going to upset the applecart here....


Isaac Brock was as English as a man born in Toronto.....he was from St. Peter Port in Guernsey, he was a channel islander, like my hero Matt (the weaver) Lle Tissier, his island bore no responsibility to the British government, and like Canada now, is and was ONLY answerable to the crown....surely you knew this?

I could point out that he was fighting for Canada's interest and that I wouldnt care if it was a bunch of mongolian heardsmen fighting for Great Britain, I'd still call them British hero's...I think this is something that Americans in US also dont understand about Canadians.

remember, he might have been born nearer the UK than Canada, but he certainly wasnt British by birth.
 

m_levesque

Electoral Member
Dec 18, 2006
524
10
18
Montreal, Quebec
I'm going to upset the applecart here....


Isaac Brock was as English as a man born in Toronto.....he was from St. Peter Port in Guernsey, he was a channel islander, like my hero Matt (the weaver) Lle Tissier, his island bore no responsibility to the British government, and like Canada now, is and was ONLY answerable to the crown....surely you knew this?.

Besides the point. The fact is he was an English General in the English army under the English crown in the English Empire. His interests as a General was in preserving that Empire.
 

ottawabill

Electoral Member
May 27, 2005
909
8
18
Eastern Ontario
yep!!! You'll never hear that the English were fighting the English in 1776-80 but they were, they were all english subjects till the actual end of the war of independence...

This is really getting silly....The point of the matter is there was no Canada as a nation in 1812
 

Daz_Hockey

Council Member
Nov 21, 2005
1,927
7
38
Besides the point. The fact is he was an English General in the English army under the English crown in the English Empire. His interests as a General was in preserving that Empire.

So?...Britain had a Canadian Prime Minister in between world war one and two, I certainly wouldnt dismiss him as a British leader just because he was Canadian...simple fact is, Canada is not the US BECAUSE of the British and their allies and unless you seriously wish to be a citizen of the USA, I see no argueing this point.

I would also think it is VERY relevant...here's a man from a place of dual french and English histroy (yet of no alligence to either), from a place given by the king of England to his noble fighting men, a place where they pay no taxes to anyone but themselves (an ideal the US...in the end was after).

He was fighting for the citizens who occupied what is now Canada, he's as Canadian as any Canadian today....yes, I know he never truely saw Canada as his home, and always longed for St Peter Port, but would you call him a Canadian hero if he were fighting for the US?...nope.

funny point my Sifu brought up the other day about the US never winning a war on their own and suggesting that they didnt win the 1776 war on their own because they were british then, well, Canada was British, he...wasnt British but fought for the people there, live with it.