I love DPRK'S State paper

Said1

Hubba Hubba
Apr 18, 2005
5,338
70
48
52
Das Kapital
Yankees Urged to Go Home
Pyongyang, June 26 (KCNA) --

It is impossible to achieve durable peace in the Korean Peninsula as long as the U.S. troops stay in south Korea. Rodong Sinmun Monday says this in a signed article.
It goes on:
The U.S. imperialist forces' presence in south Korea is a main obstacle to peace in the Korean Peninsula and a factor of increasing the danger of war there.
Their reckless moves to provoke a new war have hamstrung any process to ensure durable peace on the peninsula and created such a dangerous situation there that a nuclear war may break out any moment.
The U.S. much publicized "strategic flexibility" of its forces in south Korea and the like are nothing but dangerous moves to increase their role as aggressor forces and use south Korea as a springboard from which to realize its wild ambition to dominate the whole of Korea and the rest of Asia and disturb peace on the peninsula.
The U.S. and the pro-American forces in south Korea openly claim that the U.S. troops present in south Korea have "contributed to regional stability and peace" and served as war deterrent. This, however, is no more than sophism intended to fool the public at home and abroad demanding their withdrawal from south Korea and justify their continued presence there. The U.S. military presence in south Korea has been a stumbling block lying in the way of achieving peace on the Korean peninsula because it has brought the Korean nation nothing but disasters.
With the times changing, the reconciliation and cooperation between the north and the south and the movement for peaceful reunification have become the trend of the times on the peninsula.
The U.S. continued military presence in south Korea and its persistent pursuance of "policy of strength" quite contrary to the Koreans' wishes and the trend of the times would do the U.S. nothing good. The U.S. should drop its anachronistic policy of military occupation of south Korea, withdraw its forces from south Korea as quickly as possible and stop disturbing peace of Korea and its reunification.
To put an end to the U.S. military presence in south Korea precisely means averting a war and preserving peace.


http://www.kcna.co.jp/index-e.htm
 

FiveParadox

Governor General
Dec 20, 2005
5,875
43
48
Vancouver, BC
RE: South Korea

I don't understand why the United States of America would have such a presence in the Republic of Korea to begin with — if there is indeed such a presence, then of course they should withdraw — I see no reason to continue such a presence there.
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
My parents own swamp land in florida, and I will inherit it as well. I'll sell it to you at a discounted price.

Yeah the "Democratic Peoples" republic of Korea is old school propaganda, but as they say the best propaganda has some truth in it.
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
Well south korea used to be a dictatorship as well and the american support for south korea was nuts. But now that it is a democracy... of sorts... and with "Democratic Peoples" republic just iching to invade again..... Well... you know. Also considering that a peace treaty was never signed. The Americans do have a reason to be there.
 

Said1

Hubba Hubba
Apr 18, 2005
5,338
70
48
52
Das Kapital
Finder said:
Yeah the "Democratic Peoples" republic of Korea is old school propaganda, but as they say the best propaganda has some truth in it.

And, in this case, it's funny as hell too. :lol:
 

Finder

House Member
Dec 18, 2005
3,786
0
36
Toronto
www.mytimenow.net
To put an end to the U.S. military presence in south Korea precisely means averting a war and preserving peace.

This is the most perverse. I would say the only thing keeping the peace in Korea is the US presance. I highly doubt the "Democratic Peoples" republic of Korea would hesitate to invade the south. When you figure in that the North has a very strong military, while an econmey in shambles and the south has a weaker military but a strong ecomey, well. You get the point.