Gov't takes blame for B.C.'s forgotten children

no1important

Time Out
Jan 9, 2003
4,125
0
36
57
Vancouver
members.shaw.ca
Gov't takes blame for B.C.'s forgotten children

The premier of British Columbia has taken responsibility for the number of child deaths not being investigated by the province.

"The government is responsible, I'm responsible, no question about it," Gordon Campbell told reporters in Victoria.

He should resign forthwith. All his cutbacks hurt the most vulnerable of society. It just proves his right wing government like others only care about about making business buddies rich on the backs of people who need help and social programs.
 

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow
I also hear that the number of dead childern will exceed 80, as the investigation proceeds. This bastard should resign, feckin low life, the only reason he takes the blame is because he is caught red handed! He and his ilk are responsible for the death of those childern. Oh I can hardly wait to hear the neocons defend this one. Ah! well a few more nickels for their pockets :twisted:
 

#juan

Hall of Fame Member
Aug 30, 2005
18,326
119
63
Peapod/Rev , Cambell gave us reason to want his resignation when his first move in office was to give his corporate buddies a tax cut while chopping needed services and reniging on a signed contract with the hospital workers. Then he gets hauled up for drunken driving in Hawaii. This latest is just another in a string of stupid blunders that he is too thick skinned to even consider resigning over.
 

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow
http://www.bcasw.org/

The Vancouver Sun article (November 3) spotlighting the recent resignation of a child protection social worker points to the unbearable tension that professional social workers in British Columbia live with every day, notes Paul Jenkinson, chair of the BC Association of Social Workers Child Welfare and Family Committee. “Social workers have been given the responsibility of protecting at risk children but sit helplessly by while their ability to do this job is sabotaged by slashed government budgets, growing caseloads and the inevitable, unfinished investigation or casework that leaves children at risk”. Child protection social workers in British Columbia are a highly trained group of professionals with specialized child protection training included in their university education. “The reports that come to BCASW indicate that social workers are frustrated with senior management and a government that seems intent on ignoring social workers’ complaints or professional input”, says Jenkinson, noting that complaints and professional critiques of the child protection service have been made public in numerous submissions and media releases from BCASW over the years. Further, Child and Youth Officer Jane Morley’s recently published Asking Questions document has given voice to the high level of concern raised by BC’s child protection social workers but her report has been all but ignored by the government and the media.

The government’s lack of transparency around the cases of child deaths in British Columbia has added to morale problems in child protection social work not seen since the days of the Mathew Vadreuil tragedy, Jenkinson notes. “The Ministry has made a written commitment to openness and transparency but it seems issues in the child protection service are only addressed when the government is embarrassed by the spectre of dozens of ‘child deaths in care’ coming to the public’s attention”.
 

Reverend Blair

Council Member
Apr 3, 2004
1,238
1
38
Winnipeg
RE: Gov't takes blame for

That's why I called for his arrest instead of his resignation, Juan. Well that and the fact that it would send a message to the rest of budget-slashing neo-conservative nincompoops that they will be held responsible for their actions.

Criminal negligence causing death. It's a serious charge, especially when it leads to the death of several children.
 

Had Enough!

New Member
Nov 18, 2005
1
0
1
Vancouver
The sheer ignorance and stupidity displayed by the group of individuals posting on this thread is remarkable. You don't even understand what this story is about! These are not deaths that have been covered up. They are deaths that were not REVIEWED.

The dates of the deaths range from 1997 to present and occurred under both NDP and Liberal governments. The Liberal government is absolutely responsible for the reviews not being done as THEY changed the system from the Children's Commissioner being responsible for the review of child and infant deaths to the Provincial Coroners Service. The deaths themselves have nothing to do with this! Further, child deaths being improperly investigated is not new in British Columbia. Again, both the NDP and now Liberals have a poor track record.

Children die. It's an unfortunate fact. This story IS NOT about increasing numbers of child deaths due to cutbacks as previous posts would imply. IT IS about the Coroners Service not reviewing the deaths as we were led to believe they would and this is inexusable and the Liberals must be held accountable.

Personal attack
 

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow
Campbell admits failure in child protection system
Last updated Nov 16 2005 07:14 PM PST
CBC News
Premier Gordon Campbell admits his government's transition plan for the B.C. Children's Commission failed three years ago – and that he's ultimately responsible.

Earlier this week, the government disclosed that numerous investigations of children's deaths were halted when the commission was shut down by the B.C. Liberal government in 2002.

The children's commissioner had turned over his files to the coroner's office in 2002, with the understanding the child death reviews would continue.

Instead, at least 80 – and perhaps as many as hundreds of files were closed, and the parents were told by letter there would be no review.
"I think clearly there was a systemic breakdown," says the premier. "I think everyone understands that. British Columbian are not happy with it, I'm not happy with it, I'm sure the cabinet's not happy with it."

"Was there a system breakdown in 2002? Yes, there was. Should we have done it better? Can we fix it? Yes, we will fix it."

Not good enough, says NDP
But NDP Leader Carole James says that it's no surprise that child death reviews came to a virtual halt under the coroner.

"This wasn't a systemic breakdown. This was willful negligence by a government that designed a system of child protection designed to fail."

The Opposition Leader says it was designed to fail because the coroner's office was never meant to report publicly in child deaths, a point confirmed by the minister who oversaw the transition.

"The coroner's office doesn't do public reports," says former solicitor general Rich Coleman. "Basically it's a cause of death, it's never a finding of fault issue."

The government says it only learned about the halt in the investigations a month ago. And it was only made public this week when B.C.'s Chief Coroner spoke with reporters in Victoria.

When asked whose decision it was to shelve the investigations, the premier says that while it wasn't his decision, ultimately he is responsible.

"Look, government is responsible, I'm responsible, no question about it," says Campbell.


www.cbc.ca
 

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow
Clandestine battle waged for inquest in foster child's death
Coroner's 2003 memo sought probe in death of Savannah Hall, 3


http://www.canada.com/vancouver/vancouversun/news/story.html?id=b640cf3b-883a-43ba-ab2a-2183c8277420

The asshole said:
Was there a system breakdown in 2002? Yes, there was. Should we have done it better? Can we fix it? Yes, we will fix it."


Gordon Campbell and his government that shut down the Children's Commission in 2002. This is a fact! no matter how much the Premier would like us to believe it is not.
 

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow
http://www.vs.gov.bc.ca/stats/annual/index.html

2004

168 deaths of infants under age 1, 24 deaths age 1-4, 25 age 5-9, 30 age 10-14, and 104 age 15-19,
total of 351.

and what did the asshole say:

DEATH OF CHILDREN IN CARE OR KNOWN
TO SOCIAL SERVICES MINISTRY

G. Campbell: My question is to the Minister of Social Services. The minister informed the House today that the

[ Page 728 ]

Child and Family Review Board is up and running. We know that in the last eight months since Mr. Justice Gove reported out on the Gove report, 14 children have died under the ministry's care. My question is: why has the minister not ensured that each of the 14 deaths has been given to the Child and Family Review Board for their independent review?

[2:15]

Hon. D. Streifel: I'd like to make it clear to the members opposite and to the House that this ministry looks at the deaths of these 14 children in a very, very serious way. It's tragic -- one death is too many. These deaths are all reviewed in the process. They are all reviewed by the coroner. They are all reviewed by the director of child protection under the act. I stress again that this is a very, very serious matter. This ministry takes it very seriously, and we have taken aggressive steps since the release of the Gove report. We have moved on many, many of the recommendations of Gove, and we are committed to implementing that report.

G. Campbell: The minister may rest assured that everyone in this House takes this seriously. The fact of the matter is that the Child and Family Review Board is up and running, and our information is that not one of these incidents has been referred to that board for review.

Justice Gove was very clear -- he was very clear -- that part of the problem with care for our children in government service is the government service. It's a shame that we have to say that. It's a shame that he had to write it. It's a shame we had to read it. But we must have an independent review. My question is evidently to the Minister of Health, who seems to know more about this than the Minister of Social Services. Justice Gove identified the "invisible children" as a real problem, a problem where children who die under the government's care go unnoticed and uninvestigated. When a child dies, investigate. When a child dies, pay attention. Why on earth would the Minister of Social Services not refer each one of those deaths to the Child and Family Review Board?

Hon. D. Streifel: I would like to make it absolutely clear to the Leader of the Opposition that we do accept our role very seriously when the province, when the government, becomes parents of these children -- some 13,000 children in a year. The process is that all the deaths are reported to the director and the coroner, and that process is in place now. If one of these deaths has to be referred to that board, it will be. Again I would stress how very, very serious this issue is and how very seriously we address it. I am somewhat offended....

Interjections.

The Speaker: Order, members.

Hon. D. Streifel: I think it is not good enough that the members of the opposition tend to play politics with this very serious issue.

Interjections.

The Speaker: Order, members, please.

G. Campbell: One of the issues that we have to deal with here is the death of children under the government's care. That is what we are dealing with. My question is to the Minister of Social Services, who is responsible for these children: how many of these deaths -- the number -- have you referred to the Child and Family Review Board? The advocate that was appointed, Ms. Joyce Rigaux, was clearly one of the problems. The ministry is a problem. We do not question the minister's care for these children. What we question is: how many of these incidents -- how many of these 14 deaths -- has the minister referred to the Child and Family Review Board?

Hon. D. Streifel: Each and every death is reviewed by the director and the coroner. The work is in process. This government has re-established the integrity of the audit and review division. We have a better information-sharing system. We have hired more social workers to address these things.

Some Hon. Members: How many?

Interjections.

Hon. D. Streifel: It's obvious that the members opposite aren't interested in the steps that have been taken to protect the children in British Columbia.

B. McKinnon: The story of Bryan Lacroix is another chapter in the story of how the Ministry of Social Services is failing B.C.'s children. He was seized by the ministry at birth because he was cocaine-addicted, and before he was a month old, custody was granted to his father. The ministry dropped out of Bryan's life for 13 months until he was on life support in Children's Hospital. He died a few days later of a massive head injury, which the coroner determined was caused by a severe blow to the right side of his head. Bryan Lacroix wasn't in the custody of the ministry when he died. Clearly he should have been. My question to the minister is: has this case been referred to the Child and Family Review Board?

Hon. D. Streifel: I'll take that question on notice and return the answer to the member.

The Speaker: Member for Surrey-Cloverdale, I don't think a supplemental is allowed, given the question on notice, but if you have a new question, I will take that.

http://www.leg.bc.ca/hansard/36th1st/h0723p1.htm#728


sidenote: I address this to the rev stalker that happened by last night. Knock Knock! anybody home upstairs. The DEATH of ONE child in this province because of gordon campbell's (asshole) cuts to the most vunerable is the business of every british columbian.
 

peapod

Hall of Fame Member
Jun 26, 2004
10,745
0
36
pumpkin pie bungalow