Genetic predisposition or lifestyle choices?

[DasFX]

What does this say? US has a population of 295,000,000, and Blacks account for about 40,000,000 and homosexuals are estimated to number about 21 million.

ATLANTA, Georgia (AP) -- For the first time since the height of the AIDS epidemic in the 1980s, more than a million Americans are believed to be living with the virus that causes AIDS, the government said Monday.

The latest estimate is both good and bad news -- reflecting the success of drugs that keep more people alive and the failure of the government to "break the back" of the AIDS epidemic by its stated goal of 2005.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention said that between 1,039,000 and 1,185,000 people in the United States were living with HIV in December 2003. The previous estimate from 2002 showed that between 850,000 and 950,000 people had the AIDS virus.

The jump reflects the role of medicines that have allowed people infected with the virus to live longer, said Dr. Ronald Valdiserri, deputy director of the CDC's National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention.

"While treatment advances have been an obvious godsend to those living with the disease, it presents new challenges for prevention," Valdiserri said.

The challenges include overcoming a failure by the government to meet its 2005 goal of cutting in half the estimated 40,000 new HIV infections that have occurred every year since the 1990s. Then, Dr. Robert Janssen of the CDC pledged the government campaign would "break the back" of the epidemic.

CDC officials previously have said the country's HIV infection rate has been "relatively stable" and without change. As the National HIV Prevention Conference was set to begin this week, Valdiserri said no new infection data will be available until next year.

However, recent outbreaks of HIV and sexually transmitted diseases in major cities around the country offer a hint that new infections may be as high as 60,000 cases a year, rather than the government estimate of 40,000, said Dr. Carlos del Rio, an Emory University professor of medicine.

"The U.S. has had a clear failure in HIV prevention -- I think the increase in prevalence is a reflection of that, of the poor job we do in HIV prevention," del Rio said.

He added that the higher number is not as surprising as why the country has not been able to curb new infections. He said the CDC hasn't been given adequate resources to tackle HIV prevention and that experts have focused too much on whether it's better to promote abstinence or condom use to stop the spread of the virus.

"We're debating too much what to do and are not doing enough," he said.

At the same time, reaching the 1 million mark is "a sign of both victory and failure," said Terje Anderson, executive director of the National Association of People Living With AIDS.

"Part of the reason the number is so big is we're not dying as before," he said. "But the other problem is we have not made a significant dent in new infections."

Estimating the number of Americans with HIV has always been a difficult task for health officials, but this year's figures are believed to be the most accurate ever thanks to wider case reporting.

In the 1990s, the CDC and other agencies generally agreed that between 600,000 and 900,000 people had the virus, according to the University of California-San Francisco's Center for HIV Information.

Previous estimates -- as high as 1.5 million people -- from the 1980s were later determined to be too high. For example, the CDC estimated in 1986 that between 1 million and 1.5 million people had HIV. In 1987, that was revised to 945,000 to 1.4 million and was refined in 1990 to 800,000 to 1.2 million.

The CDC's latest estimates indicate blacks account for 47 percent of HIV cases; gay and bisexual men make up 45 percent of those living with the virus that causes AIDS, the health agency believes.

In 2003, the rates of AIDS cases were 58 per 100,000 in the black population, 10 per 100,000 Hispanics, 6 per 100,000 whites, 8 per 100,000 American Indian/Alaska native population, and 4 per 100,000 Asian/Pacific Islanders.

The CDC also warned those demographics may soon change because heterosexual blacks, women and others infected after having high-risk sex (such as with someone with HIV, an injection-drug user or a man who has sex with other men) now account for a larger proportion of those living with HIV than those who are living with full-blown AIDS.

 

[Reverend Blair]

RE: Genetic predispositio

Uh Das? AIDS is not a homosexual disease.

 

[Cosmo]

DasFX ... the topic heading you've chosen doesn't seem to match the article, unless I've missed something. The article says the highest number of people affected are black ... not exactly a lifestyle choice, is it? :?: :?:

Seems the issue about whether homosexuality is nature or choice has been covered to death in other threads. Go back and read some of those.

One line in the article stood out to me: "We're debating too much what to do and are not doing enough," he said. True. Too much talk, not enough action, in my opinion.

Interesting article, tho.

 

[GL Schmitt]

Ignoring your title, the information conveyed by that article reminds me of an old limerick:

There was a young lady named Wilde,
Who kept herself quite undefiled,
By thinking of Jesus,
Infectious diseases,
And the bother of having a child.

Had more sex education over the last ten years involved familiarization with, manual dexterity practice installing, and believable information regarding the necessity of wearing a prophylactic, instead of relying upon the above-mentioned Miss Wilde’s methodology, perhaps those statistics would be a bit more encouraging.

 

[Reverend Blair]

RE: Genetic predispositio

Ooo, limericks. Far more artful than Haiku as far as I'm concerned.

There once was a girl from Nantucket....;-)

 

[Gordon J Torture]

DasFX ... the topic heading you've chosen doesn't seem to match the article, unless I've missed something. The article says the highest number of people affected are black ... not exactly a lifestyle choice, is it?

It is a proven fact that HIV is spread more easily through anal sex than vaginal sex, and since men do not have vaginas, and not all women like it up the bum, gay men are more likely to be infected after having unprotected sex with an infected partner. That certainly does not mean only homosexuals are infected however.

 

[Said1]

DasFX ... the topic heading you've chosen doesn't seem to match the article, unless I've missed something. The article says the highest number of people affected are black ... not exactly a lifestyle choice, is it?

It is a proven fact that HIV is spread more easily through anal sex than vaginal sex, and since men do not have vaginas, and not all women like it up the bum, gay men are more likely to be infected after having unprotected sex with an infected partner. That certainly does not mean only homosexuals are infected however.

Proven where? Just in case you forgot:

HIV is a disease that is mainly transmitted through blood, semen, and vaginal fluid in four ways: Unprotected sexual intercourse - vaginal, anal, or oral.
Sharing needles or injection drug equipment
Mother-to-child during pregnancy, childbirth, or breast-feeding
Blood transfusions

 

[Gordon J Torture]

Said, here you go ...

"It’s important to remember that HIV can be transmitted through anal sex, especially anal intercourse. In fact, the risk of HIV transmission is greater than it is in vaginal intercourse because the lining of the rectum tears more easily than the vagina."

http://www.coolnurse.com/anal_sex.htm