The Globe and Mail asked all 11 candidates the same four questions in their second language — English for Mr. Dion, and French for the others. Prof. Knoerr, a bilingual expert in French as a second language at the University of Ottawa, evaluated them according to a scale used for certifying second-language ability. Only one, Ms. Fry, felt that she could not complete the interview.
The interviews ranged from three to 11 minutes, and it was usually those who rated lowest who took the longest time. That was in part because of language, but perhaps also because of the questions: When Mr. Rae was asked if he could take part in a French-language leaders debate and beat Mr. Duceppe, his answer was simply, “Yes.” At any rate, Prof. Knoerr used only about four minutes of each interview for the evaluations, to provide an equal comparison.
For politicians, the evaluations provide more than just a rating of how well they express their message. It also determines whether a listener has to make an effort to understand them — too much effort, and a TV viewer will change the channel.
Both Mr. Rae and Mr. Ignatieff scored top-level ratings, rating 4, displaying a wide range of proficiency that Prof. Knoerr labelled “impressive.” Mr. Ignatieff hesitated a bit more, but in both cases, “the message got through very well, and the pronunciation was very good.”
Mr. Dion rated just below, at 3+. “He understands absolutely everything. His vocabulary and grammar are excellent, but his accent is very present,” Prof. Knoerr said.
Mr. Volpe, whose French is perhaps underrated because he sometimes misuses English terms in French, was given a 3, enough to certify him as bilingual. Ms. Hall Findlay, a Toronto lawyer and considered a long-shot candidate, was given a borderline mark of 3– because, although she made mistakes and searched for words, she was usually able to find a way to make her point.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20060513.wxlanguage13/BNStory/National/home