A significant and perhaps the single greatest contribution made to establishing societal dynamics is how we arrive at our perspectives and opinions. We were "informed" that the Saddam Hussein regime was sitting on stockpiles of WMDs....
We've been told that our beliefs require special and particular interpretation and translation by all our various religions "holy-men"
We've been conditioned to accept that our posessions and our life-style can be used as a gauge in determining our 'worth" as people. What kind of car we drive...where we live...how big our house might be...our designer fashions....
Media spends billions sculpting perception and thought....
Why is it do you suppose that even when we're "informed" that some event or some condition exists that we're loathe to test that "information".... Do conspiracy theories exist and survive because at some level we know that we consume lies and misdirection readily?
Why are a great many arguments based on presumptions, untruths and "perspectives" instead of fact and scientific observation?
I'd suggest to you that there is greater interest to the end of controlling thought and perspectives by feeding us lies and un-truth than the raw unvarnish truth could ever achieve.
Why don't people choose fact-based evidence and narrative as their guide but rather choose some line of varnished and re-worked "truth" that promises acceptance and inclusion?
Why is artifice the rule while facts are regarded as distasteful orts of a diminished capacity to intuit the truth?
We've been told that our beliefs require special and particular interpretation and translation by all our various religions "holy-men"
We've been conditioned to accept that our posessions and our life-style can be used as a gauge in determining our 'worth" as people. What kind of car we drive...where we live...how big our house might be...our designer fashions....
Media spends billions sculpting perception and thought....
Why is it do you suppose that even when we're "informed" that some event or some condition exists that we're loathe to test that "information".... Do conspiracy theories exist and survive because at some level we know that we consume lies and misdirection readily?
Why are a great many arguments based on presumptions, untruths and "perspectives" instead of fact and scientific observation?
I'd suggest to you that there is greater interest to the end of controlling thought and perspectives by feeding us lies and un-truth than the raw unvarnish truth could ever achieve.
Why don't people choose fact-based evidence and narrative as their guide but rather choose some line of varnished and re-worked "truth" that promises acceptance and inclusion?
Why is artifice the rule while facts are regarded as distasteful orts of a diminished capacity to intuit the truth?