Lets see, I have meet harper, Layton, Orchard, Fogal, Manning, Clinton, Ziang Zemin(sp?) and a few other notable leaders.
Manning like Layton is down to earth and approachable.
Harper was warm but something seemed not quite right.
Clinton was by and far the best and most open. He is a great speaker and makes one feel welcome.
Fogal is a great lady and you can tell where her heart is.
Layton I have meet the most -three times if I remember right.
But when it comes to differences between Martin and Harper they are many.
Harper is a smart man. Very intellectual by all acounts. Though, like his party he is hiding something. I have worked in enough jails to know when someone is hiding something from me and those around.
Martin, never looked him directly in the eye, but from his track record we can see where he really stands. He is pro-business and pro-elite, but then again so is Harper - he just hides it better.
Harper is best exemplified by his own words. He is anti-government and pro-everything American style - as are his closest supporters like Mulroney.
http://www.canadiandemocraticmovement.ca/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=378
The best way to judge a person is by their past and present plans.
Harper is looking to tear down everything Canadians have built since WW2. He is borderline anti-social if one is to break him down. He has real contempt for the collective future of Canada and really thinks 'free markets' apply to everything in life. He is open about hating anything to do with social spending on the most vulnerable - again an American Republican trait.
Martin, is much the same only he does seem to know that by doing it slower many will not catch on as quick.
Make no mistake there is little difference between the two when it comes to final policies and outcomes.